1.6 rockers vs 1.5 rockers - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-04-2002, 11:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: southeast michigan
Posts: 1
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post 1.6 rockers vs 1.5 rockers

Would there be anything to gain by changeing to 1.6 rockers vs 1.5 rockers on a mildly modified 406 small block.Current componets are Dart dual plane port matched to GM 462624 heads w/mild bowl work Manley swirl polished S.S.valves,1 5/8 shorty headers,2 in exhaust w/x-over,9.25 to 1 compression,ultradyne 276/286 hyd cam,625cfm street demon carb vac.secondaries and a turbo 400 trans 2200 stall converter.Balanced and blueprinted.Installed in a 3200lb street rod.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2002, 07:50 PM
New Member
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Here
Posts: 26
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking

Well, I doubt I am telling you anything new, but that will give your valves a bit higher lift. Is it necessary with the cam you now have in there? That is a fairly radical cam, I imagine for about 3500-6500 RPM's, isn't it? Are you OK with the carb you have? Have you thought about a Q-jet carb, even the stocker ones flow about 750 cfm and up, I was wondering if you might be a bit undercarbureted at all?

I would love to hear more about whah you went through working on that 400 block, as I have one I am considering building up. OR, maybe building down into a 372 de-stroker.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-05-2002, 08:11 PM
4 Jaw Chuck's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Manitoba, Canada
Age: 46
Posts: 4,879
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 71 Times in 59 Posts
Post

With that cam you wouldn't see much, maybe 5-10 HP-maybe. You would be better of buying/building some full length headers for your rod. It will really wake up the engine and let your components work together better, shorty headers are better than factory cast iron but they don't scavenge the cyl properly (because the tuned length is way to short) and with that cam you are not getting your engines full capabilities. I would say that with a full length set of headers you could pick up 25 HP and a lot more midrange torque. Those 1.6 rockers are not worth the money and can screw up your valvetrain geometry, your cam doesn't need them. They do wake up a factory cammed engine nicely though.
__________________
Outlawed tunes from outlawed pipes
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2002, 08:08 AM
bullheimer's Avatar
NEVER use credit cards!
 

Last journal entry: car with tt2's, (stockers going back on)
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,529
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 4 Posts
Post

WHAT DO THEY COST, LIKE $100? IF YOU WISH YOUR CAM HAD MORE LIFT (MORE HP, LESS LOW END TORQUE) PUT THEM IN. THEY DON'T DO ANYTHING TO THE DURATION JUST LIFT, SO I'VE BEEN TOLD. (BUT HOW SMART WAS THAT GUY?)
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-10-2002, 10:12 AM
F-1Rodder's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 517
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

The increase ratio rockers will cause your motor to act somewhat as though you had a higher lift cam. The duration does not change, but the lift action speed is increased and the lift is increased from start to finish across the entire lift duration. So there can be benefit for a head/motor that can handle the addititional flow. It is not a substitute for an different cam because the cam grinders are taking lots of other things into consideration. If you decide to do this, be sure that you have enough spring travel to accept the increased lift. You may have to relieve some metal from the base of the spring seat to allow for the additional spring compression in order to avoid coil bind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:52 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.