193 heads, best cam. - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 09:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
193 heads, best cam.

i have a 1989 chevy blazer with 7" lift on 38x15x15 wheels with 700r4 with 373 rear swap. 350 std. bore and stroke with .275 dome piston with estimated 11.88:1 compression. I am budget building and wondering what the best cam to use would be. I have stock 193 heads that i will be porting. preferably a torque engine. i was looking at comp cams xtreme 4x4 cam with, 262 Intake / 270 Exhaust, Duration @ .050'' Lift:218 Intake / 226 Exhaust, valve lift with 1.5 rockers .462'' Intake / .480'' Exhaust, and 111 lobe separation. i guess what my question is. can my heads except this amount of lift and is this a good cam for my application. i am hoping for a lope noticeable idol. Its a weekend worrier not a daily driver and only sees road between mud holes. Any and all help would be beneficial.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 01:00 PM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 43
Posts: 10,733
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 19
Thanked 77 Times in 71 Posts
The 193 is the dreaded swirl port TBI heads. These heads work great for low RPM power and torque, but due to the restrictive swirl vane they run out of breath at 4000 RPM. So just about any cam you pick will do no good past the point of 4000 RPM as the heads don't flow enough to support power past that point. I'd be looking into getting a set of heads before I worried with the cam.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 02:54 PM
Banned
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 31
Posts: 9,544
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked 404 Times in 377 Posts
At 11.8:1 you're going to have to run race gas or E85. I hope you planed for that. Additionally, as noted the TBI heads are crap so you need a small cam to match them. the typical 204/214 "rv cam" is about right.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 04:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im allredy planing on race fuel and im not looking for high rpm. This truck is going to see very little highway if at all. It will be alot of big hills deep mud and river beds. So I want torque for the big tires plus i want the lopey idol. Not looking for crazy hp.. I bought a set of heads and they wer cracked and so im weary of huying heads or using junkyard heads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 04:55 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im allredy planing on race fuel and im not looking for high rpm. This truck is going to see very little highway if at all. It will be alot of big hills deep mud and river beds. So I want torque for the big tires plus i want the lopey idol. Not looking for crazy hp.. I bought a set of heads and they wer cracked and so im weary of huying heads or using junkyard heads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 05:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im allredy planing on race fuel and im not looking for high rpm. This truck is going to see very little highway if at all. It will be alot of big hills deep mud and river beds. So I want torque for the big tires plus i want the lopey idol. Not looking for crazy hp.. I bought a set of heads and they wer cracked and so im weary of huying heads or using junkyard heads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-18-2012, 05:15 PM
Banned
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 31
Posts: 9,544
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked 404 Times in 377 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by hcompton View Post
That cam will knock like crazy and make no power. You can not use that cam in 11.8:1 engine.

I use this to figure out my Dynamic compression ration then buy a cam big enough to avoid the knock. shoot for dcr of 8.5:1 then you can run pump gas.

Wallace Racing: Dynamic Compression Ratio Calculator

A bigger cam will lower compression until the engine comes up on the cam at higher rpm where the piston is moving faster and the fuel does not have time to heat up before the plug fires.
since you're running race fuel ignore this.



If you want good torque you need to forget about a really radical idle, they don't go together. A 274h06 cam is about the best compromise for most people. Run it with 1.6 rockers. You can find idle videos of it on youtube to give you an idea of the sound. It also has good torque from 3,000-5,000 rpm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 07:00 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Im looking at low rpm. Its not for racing. Its my play toy. I will compeat it here n there but just to prove street legal (ish) budget build can be just as good a crazy expensive built mud truck. I just have the biggest vehicle out of all my friends and I want to show them what my chevy can do. I will be changing the rears to bigger but im waiting till I am done so I can find best all around ratio. I am currently at a close stock ratio with the 3.73 rear swap. I will be going to bigger tires also after I run the tread off this set.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 10:55 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I live in pennsylvania. Home of the harley. I can get 114 oc 5 miles from my house and there r 2 air ports near by. The pistons are reliefed for spark plugs allredy. Where else would I have to reliefe? I have a 203tc and its 1:1 and a 1.96:1 low. I wont go higher than a 5.13 rear
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 01:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Its weird down here with e85. There is a place a fuew miles from me but then its almost 60 miles till next one. Plus it will be to far between filling and I dont want to absorb water in which ethenol is known for. And the bad humidity we have. Plus ill be doors deep if I go threw the rivers down here and any moisture isnt good.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 02:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 9,606
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 18
Thanked 225 Times in 181 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bogger View Post
i have a 1989 chevy blazer with 7" lift on 38x15x15 wheels with 700r4 with 373 rear swap. 350 std. bore and stroke with .275 dome piston with estimated 11.88:1 compression. I am budget building and wondering what the best cam to use would be. I have stock 193 heads that i will be porting. preferably a torque engine. i was looking at comp cams xtreme 4x4 cam with, 262 Intake / 270 Exhaust, Duration @ .050'' Lift:218 Intake / 226 Exhaust, valve lift with 1.5 rockers .462'' Intake / .480'' Exhaust, and 111 lobe separation. i guess what my question is. can my heads except this amount of lift and is this a good cam for my application. i am hoping for a lope noticeable idol. Its a weekend worrier not a daily driver and only sees road between mud holes. Any and all help would be beneficial.
The 193s are intended to get good gas milage at low RPMs in a heavy truck they aren't necessiarily meant nor do they create large low end torque numbers. Most any late model double quench, centered spark-plug, fairly modest port and valve size head will do that. What these heads really do is limit the upper RPM band. They gain very nicely to about 4300 then level off to about 5 then just quit. Figure that in your gearing and tire size.

If by porting you mean getting rid of the swirl vane you're on to something, they will wake up when ported but it's a lot of work. Check out castings 14096217 and 14011083 these are sold as cast iron L98 heads which is pretty much the same thing as the 193 with no swirl port vane to cut out. They are usually pretty cheap because nobody's looking for them. Heres where it gets tricky:

Part number 10159552 is the 55-86 version with 90 degree center holes, it is made from castings 14096217 or 14011083.

Part number 10125377 is the 1987 and up version with 72 degree center holes. It is made from castings 14096217 (sound familiar?) or 14101083 (watch this it's sooo close to above but it is different) these will fit your 89 TBI intake, or what ever intake you're running against the 193 heads.

All of these are 64 cc chambers with 1.96x1.5 valves and have a 170/175cc intake port. They are found on TPI and TBI passenger and cop cars including Camaro and Firebird.

A rebuilder may take your 193s as cores and save you some money.

Bogie

Last edited by BogiesAnnex1; 10-19-2012 at 02:26 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 02:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mora,MN
Posts: 422
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I've built and dynoed a motor with those heads for a magazine engine build (see rat rod magazine #7 i believe) for their tour car in 2011.
used dished pistons and kept the compression way down for the lousy gas they find on tour. tested on 87 octane, we didn't pull big hp numbers but torque was 360. this was with a mild hydro cam, stock replacement style pistons with thick rings. stock valve sizes, and only a port match to clean up a messy pushrod area. even had a mismatched old edelbrock scorpion intake for that old school look.
keep the duration mild, these heads drop like a stone after 4500 rpms but used in this situation they have their merits.

currently building a 383 with these same heads for a nice 90's pickup used for towing. i have no doubt we'll go over 425 ft. lbs. on pump gas and a stock computer
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 09:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
@hcomptin. We use up to 15% eth in all of our gas. Since they did that 3 years ago ive put a lot of fuel pumps in vehicles.
When it comes to intakes. I can use any I havent bought any yet. I will be carborating this engin. Had to many electrical issues with this truck. Also something to remember is this is a heavy vehicle. I weighs 6600 lbs. That is the main reason for the torque. We have a lot of hills and I want to be abble to drive up them without having to slow to 30 mph and I have no intention to go any higher than 5, 000 rpm. This block is not capable of hitting high rpm with it being 2bolt main and 268 block casting. I am just hoping to find what the max lift with new springs is for theese heads and what would be a good cam for my combination. I will most likely be removing the veins in theese heads.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 11:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Old bogie. What about 882 heads. With my large dome piston I will fill the 72 cc heads well and drop my compression a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 08:56 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mora,MN
Posts: 422
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
if its built with a cam to make power at 6000, its going to be a complete slug. just as the cam is coming on, the heads are giving up and it won't make power anywhere.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
SBC 193 head flow specs Twogreenfeet Engine 0 11-07-2010 01:30 AM
Chevy #193 heads....Your thoughts.. 8843astro Engine 12 05-10-2009 11:56 PM
193 swirl ports any good???? eatonde Engine 13 11-01-2008 02:29 AM
193 vs 882 heads Warrant Engine 18 12-22-2006 09:50 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.