![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
1964 Ford Thunderbird FE 390 Performance?
Ok where do I start? First off the search feature for this site is real nice. I have been reading up on this site on the 390 engine for the past six hours. I have learned a great deal already, but still have questions after going through all eight pages of my search results. It all has to do with possible performance upgrades for a Ford 390 out of a 64 Thunderbird. First your all probably wondering what I possibly want to do with this car, and it will be a weekend toy for street/strip. With the research I have done I'm thinking I want to upgrade the following:
Holley model 4160 600cfm Non-Adjustable Float Carbureator Weiand Action+Plus Intake Manifold Edelbrock Performer RPM Cylinder Heads Some sort of headers be it Hooker or what ever brand I can find, 3" dual exhaust, and a Cam/Lifter kit. I'm still a little lost on what cam/lifter kit to choose from. Because I can't find the specifications on the OEM cam. I'm guessing for with what I have listed above I don't need a hopped up cam, just something mild that will allow the engine to breath and flow better than stock. That is why I was looking possibly at: Edelbrock Performer-Plus Cam and Lifter Kit Is this in the ballpark for what I'm looking for? I guess my goal with the car is to possibly hit mid to low 13's in the 1/4, if that is at all possible on what I have planned above. Also I'm open to any suggestion, and will take all the advice I can get. If what I have posted above would never work together at all, please tell me why as so I can understand and learn why so I don't make the mistakes again in the future. Thanks ahead of time for all the help. |
|
||||
|
OK, I did more research and talked to the guy at work that has the car and came up with a new list of parts that will over time be bought and installed on the T-Bird. I would like the opinion of anybody on the board, but I think I might have a winner.
Heads "60069" Cam/Lifter Kit "EDL-2106" Intake Manifold "EDL-2105" Carburetor "HLY-805085" |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
By 1964 the 390 was getting a bit too small to cope with the ever-growing T-Bird and the 428 was being readied as a replacement. I would highly recommend that you consider a stroker kit as the additional 38 cubes makes a world of difference in torque development which a heavy car like the 'bird really needs more than upper end horsepower. You need to check the transmission, 64 is a change-over year for the automatic from the Borg-Warner 3 speed to the Ford built C6. Early production will have the B&W and later will have the C6. The C6 is a significant improvement. The B&W has a bolted on, overhung band servo which tends to crack the case, ever-after that happens the servo can't clamp the band as tight as it needs to be, so the car never has the omph when you get on it that it should have 'cause the band slips. The C6 solves these problems. If it were mine, I stick a Lincoln 430 or 462 with a C6 or an AOD and call it good. But that's just me. Bogie |
|
||||
|
Thanks for the info, how would I tell if it has the C6 or not, and what rear-end came in this model of T-Bird? The guy that owns it at the moment said he is pretty sure it is a Ford 9-inch rear end? Also everywhere I read up on the 390's the version that came in the 64 T-Bird was rated from factory at 300bhp. Any clue as to what the whp rating on this car would of been? My guess is around 215whp, and also how much did these cars weigh? Thanks again for all the info and help, I look forward to your next bit of info.
Last edited by nubrodder; 04-23-2008 at 12:39 PM. |
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
doesn't have to be the MEL Lincoln...
just more cubes for more available TQ.... but just lower gears will do the same thing... illustration: 390motor=380ft/lbs x 3.73 gears=1417ft/lbs of force twisting the hides to accelerate the 4400lbs 460motor=450ft/lbs x 3.08 gears=1386ft/lbs if the stock gears are 3.00 it's only 1140ft/lbs of force at the tires trying to move the 4400 lbs that's roughly a 25% acceleration force increase for either but gears are way cheaper LOL...460 motor and 3.73 gears= 1678ft/lbs= it will likely just sit there and burn the hides to the cords!!!! |
|
||||
|
Id skip the intake swap unless you go performer RPM, the stocker will perform better than the Offy or the standard performer. For headers I think the only company is going to be FPA. The Edelbrock heads will help a bunch but to get that car which is very heavy in the 13's is going to require way more than the mods you are planning. If it's a fun cruiser your looking for then haders and bigger carb. I'd go with a bigger cam than the performer, it's pretty mild for a big engine. For 64 you wont have a C6, it will be a cruiseomatic or something like that. Headers will be pricey, I'd start with a good dual exhaust and a carb, a 750 vacuum secondary would be a good choice, even better would be a factory Ford Holley, either 600 as came on the 390's or a 735 carb from a 428. Then decide if you want more, cam would be my next choice simply because of availability.
|
|
||||
|
Thanks for all the help guys I really am lost when it comes to muscle cars. Maybe instead of making all of these plans for upgrades I need to spend some time learning about these cars, the engines, and see what options open up to me.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Roasting tires can be fun .
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
460?
I had a 65 with a 460 thunderjet, the guy that did the swap had to trim the fender wells for the ps pump...lthere are lots more parts for a 460 or buy a new crate 500 plus motor.
|
|
|||||
|
nubrodder,
I was wrong, the ET numbers aren't that bad based on this basic calculator at the top... http://www.tciauto.com/Products/Tech...ulators.asp#12 "listed" car weights are never correct so find some truck scales (concrete plant/the dump/interstate/etc) and get the car weighed.... I plugged in 4600lbs and 325hp=14.25 stock with just a tweeked tune up 4600 and 375hp=13.99...about what you will gain with $$$$ headers/intake/carb 4600 and 400hp=13.33....about what you will gain with Edelbrock RPM "power package" (cam/heads/intake) |
|
|||||
|
I'd go 428, Edel heads, an Isky solid cam, RPM manifold, headders, 750+ carb... the basics. And go with a rebuilt AOD and a 3.73 rear gear. You'll probably only get about 10MPG, but it could hit the 1/4 in high 11's (depending on cam and compression) and be a blast to drive on the street.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
Wow... I didn't think it would of been that good. Thanks for doing that research, never expected anybody to go out of their way to do such things. I'm starting to think that joining this board was the best thing I could of done thus far. Those are some pretty nice numbers for how heavy the car it, and my goal for a 13's T-Bird was not to far off from what I listed. That makes me happy. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| bunch of casting #s for a ford 390 FE | 427feracer | Engine | 3 | 03-16-2008 09:48 PM |
| Ford FE engine in a Shoebox Ford | Harley Monster | General Rodding Tech | 3 | 03-01-2008 01:17 PM |
| Ford FE engine in a Shoebox Ford | Harley Monster | Engine | 2 | 02-14-2008 12:42 AM |
| Ford Muscle..what's wrong with them? | tm454 | Hotrodders' Lounge | 41 | 11-20-2006 12:37 PM |
| Ford 390 rebuild...What's the best year?? | Bo_Jangles | Engine | 3 | 03-01-2002 04:02 PM |