![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
|||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
302 cam choice.
my buddies birthday is coming up and his girlfriend asked me what a good car related gift would be, so i suggested a cam for his 87 5.0L mustang, and since she doesnt even know what a cam is, she left me to choose one. i am a chevy fan. would the b303 be a good choice? what is the rpm range for the b cam? he has 1 5/8 shorty headers, and underdrive pullies so far. he plans on getting a 70mm tb and egr spacer and maybe new upper and lower intakes, but he is not sure which one would be a good choice either.
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
anyone? do the efi 5.0L engines have roller cams?
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
hmmm, could u suggest a cam for an 87 efi 5.0l?
|
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
are there different cams between roller and non-roller engines? like 2 different E cams to choose from for each application?
|
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
Here's Ford Performance Parts' list of 5.0 cams, including the E303:
http://www.performanceparts.ford.co...rtKeyField=1329 |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
cool, thank you, that makes thing a heck of a lot easier. can someone explaine this to me, the b-303 a fair idle with .480 lift now the e-303 has a good idle with .498 lift, are they saying that smaller b-303 cam has a rougher idle than the e-303?
should the lifters be replaced also? |
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
Quote:
'85 and up are roller cams. '86 is when fuel injection was added. I would get the E303 for a smog type everyday car. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
Stock heads will be okay with .498" lift. Past that you might as well buy after market heads too. Ford heads don't flow too well. A bigger cam needs bigger heads to be worth wile.
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
This could get expensive, but I would recommend getting him a cam, and new springs and mabye pushrods that match the cam. This way you could be sure it all worked well. I dont know a whole lot about fords, but I would look at something like the Comp Cams XE270HR (218 224 @.050, .544 .544 lift 1800-5800 powerband) or the EX264HR (212 218 @ .050 .544 .544 lift 1500-5500 RPM). I would think that either of these cams would work well with stock heads and the modifications that he already has.
Adam |
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
I don't think you should bother getting him a cam if he's running stock heads, the stock cam is pretty good, and is very well matched to the heads from the factory. A ported lower intake manifold would be a better choice I think, or an electric fan or a shift kit or something.
|
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
Another really good idea is 3.73-4.11 gears and a posi. He would notice way more of a difference with that than a cam.
Adam |
|
#15
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: 302 cam choice.
thanks for all the ideas. his car is daily driven and has to pass an e-test. he has his heart set on a cam because he wants it more for the lopy idle, he could always upgrade his heads later, but ill mention the 3.73 gear set. he already has a fan, and he is going to be putting a stick back in it (used to be a 2.3l 5-speed).
|