![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
Are you saying it took a .015 blade to span the gap? 1/15th is not a viable measurement.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
Maybe a typo for 1/16" (0.0625")?
Anyway, the measurement need to be made at least w/feeler gauges between the quench band and the straight edge across the deck, spanning the bore. If you use a ruler, tip it up on its short edge, not laying flat where it can bow. Below the piston is a true flat top. You would do the same thing except measure to the quench band of your piston: |
| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cobalt327 For This Useful Post: | ||
0trbo4myCHEVUICK (12-19-2012), techinspector1 (12-25-2012) | ||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
In any event, using a ruler like that is not accurate enough IMHO. Edit I see you're getting feelers tomorrow. Good deal. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
:/ By the looks of the thing and other pictures I have seen on the net. It doesent look like my pistons are very far down in the hole at all. now im nervous as heck. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Nah if they are even with the deck my compression will be too high i think. |
|
||||||
|
Technically the chamber volume includes the space between the deck the top of the top ring.In cases where you where right at the rag-get edge of a limit then that would be important. Some piston companies move the top ring down because of the application and heat issues.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
The "ideal" quench measurement is right at 0.040". About the most common composite head gasket thickness is 0.041". So a zero deck (piston even w/the block) and a 0.041" head gasket will put the quench measurement right where it needs to be. You do not want to adjust the compression ratio by making the quench distance wider. So using a thicker head gasket or a piston deeper in the hole are both bad plans as compared to a zero deck and a 0.040" range head gasket- or any other combination of HG thickness/piston deck height (piston in the hole) that equals about 0.040". |
| The Following User Says Thank You to cobalt327 For This Useful Post: | ||
0trbo4myCHEVUICK (12-20-2012) | ||
|
|||||
|
Okay, measured with the feeler gauges. Placed the steel ruler in the 3-9 position if looking at the side of the block and measured from the squish band. Got .038..
was only able to measure the #1 piston at the moment. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
OK, now it'll be interesting to see what the other 3 corners look like. ![]() This is one of the cornerstones of having a good build and not having a good build. The more information you can put together about various pieces in the motor, the better your choices will be for parts that contribute to the combination. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| trying to build a 357 | Newbie3191 | Engine | 8 | 07-01-2010 10:10 AM |
| HP and TQ Guesses of my 357 build | ORANGEGASM | Engine | 2 | 08-13-2008 07:08 PM |
| 357...??? | jkingof9561 | Engine | 2 | 05-04-2008 03:18 PM |
| 357 ci chevy | bstout3 | Engine | 1 | 11-20-2004 06:00 PM |
| breaking in my 357... | Sagacious | Engine | 3 | 08-05-2004 04:51 PM |