![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
350 sbc..305 heads??
I am currently in the building stage of a 350 chevy small block and had a quick question on the heads I may be using. A friend of mine suggested that I use a set of 305 chevy heads which would be worked to accomidate a 1.94 In/1.60EX. valve with a 58cc chamber. He said that it was a pretty do-able thing and would make my compression ratio very good as well.....anyone have any experience with this kind of build??? any ideas would be greatly appreciated..Thanks
|
|
||||||
|
maybe if you would post this in the engine section you'd get a good answer
|
|
||||||
|
moving it.....
__________________
Ontario Rodders |
|
||||||
|
From what I understand you can do it,but you can do the same with a set of 350 heads and they flow better than the 305 heads.The 305 heads even ported do not flow like a set of 350 heads I believe. So in essence sinking the money in them is not worth it.Somone correct me if I am wrong.
|
|
||||||
|
I currently run 305 heads on my 350 in my Trans Am, I did give them a port job to help them along though. I got them to flow 203cfm intake and 155 cfm exhaust with the stock valves, which is about as good as a stock 350 head. I get about 400HP out of my motor with them, but that is about maxing out the head flow, and being helped by 11.7:1 compression. I need to run octane boost with this much compression, plus a special waterless coolant to prevent detonation. If you are willing to do some porting to them they can be made to work quite well, but if I had to do it over again I would have used 350 heads with small chambers.
|
|
||||||
|
bowl area is constrictive due to small valves, the runners are about the same. There's a fair bit of work involved, but you sound like you want to bolt them on just for the compression boost. No, its not worth it for that, ever.
K |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|