![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
350 vs 383?
My name is Brad Perkins. I am building a 1959 Chevy "Suburban" and I am getting rid of the Olds 307 that is currently in it. In debating between a crate SB 350 and a 383, I am wondering if the cost is that much different and what the gas mileage hit might be. It is a 4000 lb. vehicle. and the torque factor may be an issue. It is not planned to be a racer, but I do want to be able to get it off the line at a stoplight. Any idea of costs?
|
|
|||||
|
Also forgot the factor of cost. Mine that I had 7 years ago was really not that much more then the last two 350 engines I did. About the main cost factor for me was that the after market balancers that are external for a 400 sbc crank always cost more on average.
When I got mine I got a rotating assembly using the shorter 5.565 connecting rods so I was able to use a normal 350 piston and not have to worry about the rod bolts hitting the cam lobes. When I came time to rebuild the engine to make it a full roller motor I learned about the 383 piston having the rings moved up more towards the top of the piston and having to have special type after market connecting rods to clear the rod bolts from hitting the cam lobes. I personally don't like the idea of grinding on any of the rod bolt heads or the rods them selves depending of they are through bolt or cap screw type just to make them work. It's not normal but I have heard of the bolts being grounded down too much and the bolt was ripped clear through the rod itself cause of too much material taken off. That is why I went back with a 350 combo. Mine are not raced anyways just driven for fun nothing more. |
|
||||
|
If your going to buy a crank then go with a 383. As for money spent the cranks will be the same price no matter the stroke, the rods will be the same price, pistons may or may not be the same price, but should be pretty close to each other. Other than that it is a small block chevy......
Also you said something about crate engines, GM makes a Crate engine 383, might be something to look into. As for gas milage, that kind of depends on how you drive.
|
|
||||||
|
For a '59 'Burb I'd go with the 383. They are relatively heavy and push a LOT of air, the 383 won't have to work as hard and for that reason may actually get a little better mileage, certainly no worse if tuned properly.
|
|
||||||
|
Didn't that 59 suburban come with a a little 283 when it was new? That means it more than likely has a pretty low geared rear end(numerically higher). Putting a 350 or a 383 in there without changing gears in the dif will likely burn more gas than the 307 did. If you can change gearing in the differential then a 383 or 350 might maybe get a little bit better gas mileage if they were tuned well but it just takes a certain amount of fuel to make a certain amount of power. The bigger motor can make a similar amount of power at a lower rpm that a smaller motor can make at a higher rpm and will burn a similar amount of fuel doing it.
|
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 383 crank in a 350 block | campracing | Engine | 14 | 06-19-2010 04:29 AM |
| 350 vs 383 build for performance | Biscuit6447 | Hotrodding Basics | 20 | 03-05-2010 08:42 AM |
| 350 or 383 | 77StingRay | Hotrodding Basics | 9 | 06-14-2007 08:53 AM |
| SBC Strokers - 350 vs 400 Blocks & Combos (not just 383 & 406) | ez2cdave | Engine | 11 | 05-21-2007 09:34 PM |
| 350 to 383 "Camparison" | ssmonty | Engine | 5 | 05-17-2007 07:17 PM |