396bbc vs 400 sbc ? - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 09:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
396bbc vs 400 sbc ?

me and my dad got into a heated debat . he thinks the 396 is capable of more hp than a 400 . i obviously think the 400 sbc can match the 396 bbc hp and torque or better it. what do you guys think.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 10:54 PM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 40
Posts: 10,658
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 15
Thanked 59 Times in 56 Posts
Several magazines years ago had this same battle. The Rat motor took the mouse motor to school on the dyno and the track. The BBC is capable of more airflow than the SBC due to it's canted valve heads and airflow is power.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to DoubleVision For This Useful Post:
E.Furgal (10-20-2012)
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 10-19-2012, 11:16 PM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 8,081
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 322
Thanked 783 Times in 749 Posts
the heads are the power like double said. but,,,why not compare horse power per dollar spent?Then factor in size and weight and application...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 04:58 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 50
Posts: 4,023
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
Power is in the heads and BBC's have an advantage in that department.

Also a stock 396 bbc block can handle more max power as compared to a stock 400 sbc block.

However, a BBC will get 25% less MPG as compared to a similarly built SBC.

Plus a BBC is a tougher fit and puts an extra 150 pound on the front end.

And a BBC is more expensive to build.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 05:54 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hopewell, Va
Age: 62
Posts: 1,206
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 117 Times in 113 Posts
396bbc vs 400 sbc ?

I have a 1967 Camaro that I bought in 1997. I rebuilt a 1971 454 engine for it. The compression ratio was about 11:1 and I mixed 93 octane pump gas with turbo blue 50/50. Well I got the idea to replace it with a 383 mechanical roller motor to use all pump gas and set my big block up on an engine stand for storage. Man, was I disappointed. Don't get me wrong it had power but not the the torque the big block had. A couple years later I ordered an Eagle 4.00" stroke rotating assembly with pistons that gave me 9:1 compression and rebuilt the big block again and reinstalled it. I sold the 383 and will keep the big block in it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 07:22 PM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 8,081
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 322
Thanked 783 Times in 749 Posts
454 c10
However, a BBC will get 25% less MPG as compared to a similarly built SBC.
show me the math please?I dont understand that part of your post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 07:37 PM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 9,153
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 380 Times in 374 Posts
I had many 396 BBC and a few 400 SBC's.... The 396's were very good on gas,,,, no worse then the 400SB's.

Equal build up the 396 makes more power and torque. It's a very durable motor too.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 09:44 PM
66GMC's Avatar
Get in, sit down, hang on
 

Last journal entry: Cab Removal
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Olds, Alberta Canada
Age: 57
Posts: 2,761
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 32
Thanked 90 Times in 85 Posts
Add one more vote for the BBC.

When I was looking to repower my 66, replacing the buzzin' half dozen, I took a look at some HP/TQ graphs and decided to go with the rat.
The HP/TQ peaks just looked very sharp on the SBC, and so much broader on the BBC.
I reasoned that I could make a lot more dependable power at significantly lower RPM's, and lose very little power between shift points.

Well that, and simply going for a ride in my brother's 69 GMC with a 427 in it. It was just a weapon!

The sound of a big-breathing BBC trying to suck air past closed throttle plates on decelleration was a factor!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 10-20-2012, 10:41 PM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 8,081
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 322
Thanked 783 Times in 749 Posts
Properly matched parts in a small block or big block makes no difference.If it runs good it sounds good.Close your eyes they sound the same.Powerful engines sound great,doesnt matter what block holds the parts together.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2012, 06:54 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 50
Posts: 4,023
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by vinniekq2 View Post
454 c10
However, a BBC will get 25% less MPG as compared to a similarly built SBC.
show me the math please?I dont understand that part of your post
Over the years, I have put in 396, a 454, a 350, and a 400 in my truck (all in the same truck). And BBC's get 25% worst mileage, that is it. In fact, the 454 got slightly better mpg than the 396. (+0.5 mpg)

It is no secret that BBC heads are very inefficient. Plus the blocks have more energy losses (more bearings surface and more rotational mass) as compared to a SBC.

here is some data BSFC data that might help.
http://www.strokerengine.com/NGPCT.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2012, 12:18 PM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 56
Posts: 8,081
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 322
Thanked 783 Times in 749 Posts
If you compare SFC based on fuel burnt per horse power produced,you will find that there is very little difference between small and big blocks.You cannot directly compare a 350 hp 350 to a 350 hp 454.MPG is dependent on gearing and other factors.A 454 that makes the same horse power as a 350 will make more torque,there fore to compare MPG the 454 can use a taller gear because of the higher torque output so should be operated at a lower rpm for fuel economy.Both engine convert the same fuel to heat,,,, If you get down to the technical differences then the BB will lose some efficiency due to the heavier crank and reciprocating weight,slightly more friction because of bore,extra few horses required to move the extra 100 pounds.
again horse power is a part of the power formula,torque is also a part to consider.High performance engines require similar pounds of fuel to create similar power outputs.If you compared a 700 hp 350 to a 900 hp 454,the pounds of fuel burnt per horse power create would be very close.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2012, 07:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 22
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ok the old man is right . but i still like the 400 sbc more especially with the new big stroker assembellys available today. thank you for your info.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2012, 04:38 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 50
Posts: 4,023
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
Well, I have ran BBC and SBC in the same truck with the same drive line and I promise you a BBC gets a lot worst MPG than a SBC.

Very inefficient heads and more internal losses makes the BBC a gas hog, plain and simple.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2012, 05:00 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hopewell, Va
Age: 62
Posts: 1,206
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 117 Times in 113 Posts
396BBC vs 400 sbc

Quote:
Originally Posted by vinniekq2 View Post
454 c10
However, a BBC will get 25% less MPG as compared to a similarly built SBC.
show me the math please?I dont understand that part of your post
The car is a toy not driven daily. I put the big block in the car as a perference over a small block. As long as I can run pump gas (93 octane) I will spend the difference. It is the cost of racing gas that I didn't want to spend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 10-22-2012, 05:50 AM
Member
 

Last journal entry: was hoping for better than this
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 265
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 16
Thanked 20 Times in 20 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 454C10 View Post
Well, I have ran BBC and SBC in the same truck with the same drive line and I promise you a BBC gets a lot worst MPG than a SBC.

Very inefficient heads and more internal losses makes the BBC a gas hog, plain and simple.
you answered your own problem..
same driveline..
to get good mpg out of a big block you have to gear to use the low end..
I had a mid 80's monte ls with 2.14 reargears and got 17 city and 29 highway.. with a vac 2nd carb.. efi , so I'm told would even do better.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
400 sbc vs 400 pontiac Artemis Entreri Engine 52 09-08-2010 06:17 PM
Sbc 400 Vibora Engine 2 04-01-2010 03:23 PM
FI for 400 SBC Dbodily Engine 0 06-17-2003 08:08 AM
0.060 over 350 sbc or 0.040 over 400 splayed cap sbc tony350ss Engine 4 05-17-2003 09:02 PM
400 SBC 4doorjoe Engine 2 01-10-2003 07:03 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.