400 Block With a 327 Crank - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 07:42 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 4
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post 400 Block With a 327 Crank

Has anyone ever put a large journal 327 crank in a 400 block? I was wondering about the pros and cons of it? Would it require the same modifications as putting a 350 crank in a 400 block to make a 377? Thanks for the input.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:18 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 266
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

As you know 327 had shorter stroke than 350 so it would build RPM faster. I don't what it would be. in cubic inches. A 327 crank in a 400 but sound good. some people put 327 cranks in 350 and all it is a 350.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:33 PM
BstMech's Avatar
NYOFP4RJ3CHRIS
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: TN. In the corporate states of America
Age: 39
Posts: 1,552
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

[quote]Originally posted by 70 nova:
<strong>As you know 327 had shorter stroke than 350 so it would build RPM faster. I don't what it would be. in cubic inches. A 327 crank in a 400 but sound good. some people put 327 cranks in 350 and all it is a 350.</strong><hr></blockquote>

Psssst...all it would be is a 327.

:p
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:35 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 266
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

AS I said i was not sure Never heard of some one doing that.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:40 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Victorville, CA
Posts: 49
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Actually it would be 347.5 cubic inches, with a stock 4.125 bore 400, and a stock 3.25 stroke 327.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:46 PM
BstMech's Avatar
NYOFP4RJ3CHRIS
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: TN. In the corporate states of America
Age: 39
Posts: 1,552
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

[quote]Originally posted by 70 nova:
<strong> some people put 327 cranks in 350 and all it is a 350.</strong><hr></blockquote>

350, same bore as a 327, you put a 327 crank in a 350 block, and you have a 327. :p
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 09:06 PM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 39
Posts: 10,571
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 12
Thanked 45 Times in 42 Posts
Post

Smokey yunick did this same combo to make high RPM engines, he said they made a lot of midrange and were ideal for circle track dirt cars.
And just for 70 Nova,, here.
Cubic Inch Calculator:
bore X Bore X 0.7854 X stroke X number of cylinders =
Or
4.000 X 4.000 X 0.7854 X 3.480 X 8 = 350
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 02-21-2003, 09:34 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 88
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Here's two basic small valve mildish cam 9:1 engines I made in engine analyzer everythings the same except the block/crank

347 Chev = 437 ft lbs @ 4000 rpm
388 hp @ 5500 rpm

350 Chev = 438 ft lbs @ 4000 rpm
386 hp @ 5500 rpm

In the standard 3300 pound f-body with 10 inch slicks we get a slight wheel spinish

with the 347
11.89 112.8 mph

And with the 350
11.9 112.5 mph

Worth taking notice that the 347 has alot slower piston speed, so it should be able to rev higher before it breaks (about 400 rpm), if you really wanted to impress the crowds you could have a big solid cam and use a 3 inch crank in the 400 block to make a 321 and run 7000+ rpms for the same piston speed such an engine would be doing 440 hp at 6500 rpm still with little valves (only changed the cam), running 11.53 and 117.8 mph but with a 4000 rpm stall (3500 was fastest for the other 2 engines but this one needs 4000 to get going) 0-60 mph in 3.1 seconds. Anyway you would need a better top end for those revs all day, ok that's all, I've got to do an online exam now :/
Reply With Quote

Recent Engine posts with photos


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:33 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.