![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
409 w engine stroker question
Is it possible to install a 454 crank into a 409 I have a buddy who bought a car online the guy claims the 409 has a 454 crank. I was always under the assumption that the w engine was in a league of its own as far as interchangability goes is this correct or is it possibly?
|
|
|||||
|
engine parts
My guess yould be that it probably will interchange with some work. Gm invested a lot of money in the machinery to produce that engine and normally the major dimensions, center lines stay the same for many years and many different engines built on that old machinery. , . the Ford small blocks evolved from the old Y blocks, they were built on the same machinery , the 348-409 had the top of the block angled , NOT 90* to the bore, and the heads did not have the combustion chamber, it was in the wedge.
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to timothale For This Useful Post: | ||
69 widetrack (12-04-2012) | ||
|
|||||
|
Yes
just google 348-409 454, they say start grinding and save all that go fast 409 dust you make, sprinkle it over your small block, add vigero, water and sun. see if will grow up to be a 409.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
At the same time, over in Dearborn, the Ford camp was introducing the 430 wedge, later to become the 462. These motors had some dimensions that were the same as the later 429/460 motors. Several years ago, I bolted a Toploader 4-spd to a 430 using a Lakewood scattershield that was designed for a 460. Same bellhousing bolt spacing. Interestingly, both the 348 and the 430 had combustion chambers that were formed by crescents in the piston crowns and the cylinder heads were dead flat with no chambers at all. I wonder how both manufacturers happened to introduce the exact same design at exactly the same time???????? ![]() Can you say "industrial espionage"? This idea of the crescent combustion chamber didn't last long. Turned out the chamber was so long that flame propogation was poor and the motors were dirty from an emissions standpoint. I believe the 348/409 was produced from 1958 to 1965 and the 430/462 was produced from 1958 to 1966. I think 1967 was the first year for emissions equipment from Detroit. Last edited by techinspector1; 12-04-2012 at 06:55 PM. |
| The Following User Says Thank You to techinspector1 For This Useful Post: | ||
69 widetrack (12-04-2012) | ||
|
|||||
|
spy's
Gm had the locking steering column designed before Ford. Someone gave Ford some preliminary drawings that did not have the dimensions , ford made a prototype and the key turned the wrong way to start. They had ran the sketches upside down in the ozilid machine.
|
|
||||
|
It is cheaper and easier to buy an Eagle stroker crank for a 409. You can get it in 3.76 and 4.0 strokes. Ready to drop in. You can use a 6.135 rod with this combo as well as the 6.385 and longer rods if you like with off the shelf Ross pistons. A small amount of clearancing was needed for my 4 inch arm in my 09 with H beam rods.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
Yes, will need balance job and possibly balance weights recontoured to help balance job.
|
|
||||
|
yea i told him make sure he has a 454 balancer and fly wheel on it and the dip stick didnt put the 409 balancer on it if thats even possible
|
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SBC 409 camshaft question | MT69chevelle | Engine | 4 | 03-22-2011 03:46 PM |
| 409 / 348 question | dennys1934 | Engine | 4 | 08-02-2010 07:29 PM |
| Chevy 409 Engine build | Huneycutt | Engine | 1 | 04-16-2010 05:50 PM |
| 409 stroker combos 3.760, 4.00 or 4.25? | Jared | Engine | 3 | 01-21-2005 05:16 PM |
| Chevy Engine 409 | 93_406cobra | Engine | 2 | 06-16-2004 07:53 PM |