53 Chevy truck ifs - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Suspension - Brakes - Steering
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-20-2013, 07:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 1
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
53 Chevy truck ifs

I have a 53 Chevy truck 3/4 ton all original and I have access to a 84 monte Carlo. I am considering putting the front clip and rear end on my 53 frame. Any suggestions or info would be greatly appreciated.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2013, 11:16 AM
MARTINSR's Avatar
Brian Martin,Freelance adviser
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San francisco bay area
Age: 55
Posts: 12,978
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 694
Thanked 1,062 Times in 947 Posts
I'm not big on the frame clip personally. Cutting and welding the frame together is just one small part of the project, cutting inner fenders and making bumper brackets up and the worse part the rad support are all more than the frame if you ask me. That Monte is a better choice than the popular Camaro being it's narrower by a few inches, makes a BIG difference.

What is stopping you from getting one of the many kits to put a Mustang II type front end on it? If it's the money, think about that again, rebuilding Monte, replacing the leaking steering box with rebuilt, all the metal needed, etc. The kit isn't that much when you add it all up. They have all kinds of rear leafs that simply bolt in that improve that old trucks ride too.

Think about it, but here is some study for you on doing the graft you have planned.

http://www.hotrodders.com/search?q=f...753j1530517j24

Brian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2013, 01:13 PM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Wheelbase database Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,504
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 6
Thanked 143 Times in 130 Posts
The Mustang II front end is actually the PINTO front end - not something I'd put under a 3/4 ton truck. The Monte has a 7.5" rear axle - also not something I'd put under a 3/4 ton truck.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2013, 01:53 PM
MARTINSR's Avatar
Brian Martin,Freelance adviser
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San francisco bay area
Age: 55
Posts: 12,978
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 694
Thanked 1,062 Times in 947 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_padavano View Post
The Mustang II front end is actually the PINTO front end - not something I'd put under a 3/4 ton truck. The Monte has a 7.5" rear axle - also not something I'd put under a 3/4 ton truck.
I'm with you as far as stock Pinto stuff, but with the aftermarket ones in the rodding world, people use them all the time. I have a 56 Ford pickup parked 30 feet from me right now with one that has been on it for years. I understand your concerns of course, I am just looking at other options. The stock Mustang was about a 1000 lbs less than the truck. But there are TONS of options now.

On the rear end, if he doesn't plan on a big hp motor or slicks or hauling hay that will be fine. The only real difference between a 1/2 ton and a 3/4 ton truck of this year are the front hubs and springs, the rear axle housing assy with springs and about 6 inches in the frame and bed length. Put half ton hubs and a rear axle assy and springs on a 3/4 ton and you effectively have a 1/2 ton truck.

My own 48 started out as a 3/4 ton, it had a 55 Passenger car rear installed with leafs removed from the springs and pass car hubs on the front with leafs removed and that was all there was to it until I put a 1/2 frame under it a few years after I got it. So there isn't that big of a difference.

The truck only weights about 270 lbs more than that Monte Carlo, mine tipped the scales at about 3500 with the 12 bolt rear, with a Buick 401 and Turbo 400 to give an idea.

Your concerns are valid, I am not saying they aren't, but there are a bunch of options outside of frame clips.

Brian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-22-2013, 11:22 PM
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Update
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 56
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
I'm building a 3/4 ton '48 using an S10 rearend and a Heidts Mustang 2 front end. I picked the M2 up for $1500 on EBAY including power rack, dropped spindles, sway bar, big block springs and stainless brake lines. If you shop around you can find some good deals.

I subframed my '52 Chev panel and that creates more work with the front fenders, bumper etc. That is why I'm going with the M2 this time.

Good luck with your build.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2013, 04:35 AM
da34guy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Bumfork, OK
Posts: 443
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 4
Thanked 31 Times in 29 Posts
Did ya ever think to measure the width of the monte front end?
WAAAAAAAAAY to wide
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-23-2013, 08:19 AM
MARTINSR's Avatar
Brian Martin,Freelance adviser
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: San francisco bay area
Age: 55
Posts: 12,978
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 694
Thanked 1,062 Times in 947 Posts
It's actually about two inches narrower than the Camaro front clip that everyone does!
Now, again, I don't like either one, it's still too wide and I agree with you. There are just too many reasons to not do it. But plenty of people do and they make it work.

But I agree, it's too wide. If you are forced to mess with tire size and rim offset just to get something to fit instead of the tire and rim you want that looks the best to you, that is one reason to not do a frame clip.

Brian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Suspension - Brakes - Steering posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
IFS for a 57 chevy truck jandre Suspension - Brakes - Steering 4 01-15-2013 09:05 AM
Must II IFS/Chevy AD truck Don Meyer Suspension - Brakes - Steering 10 10-08-2008 07:44 AM
IFS for a 57 CHEVY TRUCK 57 TRK Suspension - Brakes - Steering 3 11-01-2007 08:23 PM
IFS for 46 chevy truck derrick3422 Suspension - Brakes - Steering 4 06-10-2004 06:56 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.