600cfm not enough? - Page 4 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #46 (permalink)  
Old 05-16-2005, 08:14 PM
lluciano77's Avatar
Short changed on common sense
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: california
Age: 37
Posts: 3,548
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Huskinhano
In the latest Popular Hotrodding mag, they have a 75 Camaro that they're doing a build on. They just dyno'd the new "smog" 383 motor. It made 402 hp using a 600 emission Holley. I'd say the other guys who recommended a 600 cfm carb are right on the money!
I guarantee it would have made more with a bigger carb. My engine could make some respectable numbers with a 350 CFM 2 barrell.

Please note the "SMOG" 383 motor part of it. That kind of indicates on it's own that the engine we detuned.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #47 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2005, 10:29 AM
SmallBlock_guy's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Detroit
Age: 40
Posts: 125
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Gonig to try the 750

I think I am going to try the 750 with new rods and jets (yea, its a carter). I appreciate all the good info. That is why I keep finding myself back at this site!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #48 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2005, 06:38 PM
Member
 

Last journal entry: Future Plans
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Port alberni, British Columbia
Age: 29
Posts: 118
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Well i have had the car out for a week now and it gets worse mileage then my truck even when i dont give'r, There is a 600 holley rebuilt in the local buy/sell for $100 might check that out
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #49 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2005, 06:41 PM
lluciano77's Avatar
Short changed on common sense
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: california
Age: 37
Posts: 3,548
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Go with the 4010 600 CFM carb. You will get them cheaper then that on Ebay. You will get better mileage than the Avenger series, better idle quality, better cold starts, better atomization, and less leaks.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...sPageName=WDVW

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/eB...sPageName=WDVW
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #50 (permalink)  
Old 05-20-2005, 07:44 PM
Hippie's Avatar
Analog man in a digital world.
 

Last journal entry: HEI comparison.
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,255
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 85Sierra
Well i have had the car out for a week now and it gets worse mileage then my truck even when i dont give'r, There is a 600 holley rebuilt in the local buy/sell for $100 might check that out
How much time have you spent dialing in the carb? Q-Jets are good but they aren't magic....... and the same goes for any carb you might try. You might get lucky and come close but the odds that it is optimal are pretty slim.

Also you may not believe this but with your combo that 2.73 might be hurting your mileage, a lower gear like a 3.08 or 3.23 may actually improve it and it certainly won't hurt the performance. With your cam you're probably having to give it a fair amount of throttle to get it rolling because it's not "up on the cam", in other words it isn't in the "fat" part of the torque curve yet. A loose converter doesn't help mileage either. A lower gear will help the torque multiplication and get it into the torque curve at a slower vehicle speed plus keep it in the curve at cruise RPM. That's where an OD transmission, lock up converter and a lower rear gear can really shine. I know there's a lot of argument that keeping engine RPM as low as possible is the key to good fuel economy but it's only part of the story. New cars are geared so incredibly high at least in part to reduce "emissions per mile", a slightly lower Final Drive Ratio in many cases would give better economy but increase emissions per mile. For example my '94 LeSabre has a 2.84 differential plus 30% OD for an FDR of 1.99 to 1 . It gets 25-26 HWY MPG when driven at a steady 55MPH, at a steady 70 MPH it gets a consistent 28-29. A swap to a 3.08 differential would boost my 55MPH gas mileage to 28-29 or even a tad better because of less wind resistance even though it increased engine RPM. I do most of my driving in that car at 55-60 and if it didn't have 176,000 on it I'd be swapping the differential. It's a piece of cake on a 4T60E.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Holley 600cfm problems fulton Engine 5 03-27-2005 06:57 PM
600cfm carb too big? montea Engine 6 09-09-2004 03:22 PM
600cfm Carb question calimstng66 Engine 12 04-19-2004 08:34 PM
750 cfm carb - tuning - smaller jets or 600cfm? 65truck Engine 8 01-20-2004 06:13 PM
Is a 650cfm carb noticeably better than a 600cfm Stinky Engine 1 06-18-2003 09:00 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.