62 ford unibody what engins have the same bolt pattern - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2011, 02:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: new mexico
Posts: 6
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
62 ford unibody what engins have the same bolt pattern

what all engines have the same bolt pattern as the 390 for my 62 unibody and out of those engines what would be the best to make in to a Hotrod?

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2011, 05:46 PM
LATECH's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 

Last journal entry: Motor - vator
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
Posts: 5,311
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 221
Thanked 273 Times in 253 Posts
you have the late MEL pattern (mercury edsel lincoln)
332, 352, 360, 361, 390,406,410 mercury,427 and 428 would fit.
Not a lot of choices if you were hoping for a little later model engine.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-18-2011, 07:27 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 6,947
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 4
Thanked 480 Times in 410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chford
what all engines have the same bolt pattern as the 390 for my 62 unibody and out of those engines what would be the best to make in to a Hotrod?
The only 2 unibody Fords from 1962 that I know of is the Falcon and Fairlane, not counting the Lincoln.

The Farlane came only with a 170 inch inline Falcon 6 and the new 221 inch V8 which morphed into being called the Windsor block.

The Falcon only came with the 144 or 170 inch inline 6 for 1962 it waited till the next year to get a 260 V8 option.

Both of these cars have platforms are very similar to that of the 1964&1/2 (1965/1966) Mustang. They can fit the Small Block Windsor V8, but the bell-housing bolt pattern changes with mid production of the 289, so the 221, 260 and early 289 thru 64 production use a 5 bolt small pattern while the 65 and up 289 uses a larger 6 bolt pattern, also, common to the 302, 351W and early 351 Clevelands, some but not all M block (351 and 400) engines. The bell-housing, therefore, needs to match the year of the engine. But the engine mounts remain the same across models and time.

The big blocks would not fit without a lot of major platform work to get clearance for their width, the early Falcon and Fairlane are about 3 inches too narrow across the spring towers. Ford stuffed 427's into the 1964 Fairlane, but all of those were custom built race cars. The big block did not become available as a production option till the 1966 Fairlane which is on a different platform than the earlier versions. The Mustang didn't get a wider platform that would accommodate the FE blocks till 1967.

The MEL blocks were never fitted by the factory to these vehicles. Those being the 383 not to be confused with the Chryslers of the same displacement, the 410 used by the Edsel not to be confused with the FE version of the same size, and the 430 used in full tilt Mercs in 58 and 59 and the Lincoln till ending the MEL's run with the 462.

The FE/FT and the MEL do not share a bellhousing bolt pattern except for 1958,59 and part of 60, neither shares a bolt pattern with either of the Windsor patterns.

The 144 and 170 engines have their own bolt pattern it is shared with the 200 till 1977.

200s after 1977, the 250 which is a Falcon block, the 240 which is the big six block and its stretched sibling the 300 all share the Windsor bell-housing bolt pattern.

So to keep life simple you need to have commonality of engine type and in many cases year of engine and bell-housing or transmission, if those parts are of one piece constriction. Sorting out Ford and their bell-housing patterns is more than enough to drive a sober man to drink.

Bogie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2011, 07:12 PM
toomanyoldFords's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 18
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ford had a unibody F100 in thous years.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-16-2011, 10:44 PM
Ford Junkie's Avatar
No substitute for cubic inches
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: va
Posts: 211
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
oldbogie here are a couple of pics of style truck he has...............

http://images1.americanlisted.com/nl...al_9254615.jpg

http://image.automotive.com/f/images...front_left.jpg

These are a couple I found online,
Tony
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 10-17-2011, 06:58 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 6,947
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 4
Thanked 480 Times in 410 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ford Junkie
oldbogie here are a couple of pics of style truck he has...............

http://images1.americanlisted.com/nl...al_9254615.jpg

http://image.automotive.com/f/images...front_left.jpg

These are a couple I found online,
Tony
The F100 Unibody in and around 1962 is a styling option where the bed is welded and smoothed to the cab. Underneath it has a frame. The unitized body trucks were built on the Econoline which uses a lot of Falcon parts.

The F100 used big truck engine options starting with the 223 inline 6, probably most were built with 292 Y blocks, these are different from FE/FT and MEL engines. For his 390, he'd need to use trannys/bellhousings for the FE/FT family which is 332, 352, 360, 361, 390, 406, the FE 410 (not to be confused with the MEL 410), 427, and 428. The early MEL 383, 410, 430 from 1958 into 1960 would work but Ford made a running change on the MEL's so after that they won't bolt without an adapter.

Bogie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ford Bolt Pattern 4.25 inch? 31fordcoupe Suspension - Brakes - Steering 21 10-29-2009 02:44 AM
Ford 9" Bolt Pattern fredbaker Transmission - Rearend 3 10-15-2009 03:34 PM
Ford 9" Bolt Pattern fredbaker Transmission - Rearend 4 09-05-2009 11:48 AM
Ford 9" lug bolt pattern sparkyct55 Transmission - Rearend 2 04-17-2009 09:36 PM
GM rotors with Ford bolt pattern junkyardjeff Suspension - Brakes - Steering 4 01-26-2008 04:24 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:44 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.