8/8 split rocker ratios - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 12:46 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kenosha, WI
Posts: 20
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
8/8 split rocker ratios

I have a high energy 268H in a sbc with 882 heads home ported with 1.94I. It is a split profile cam and with my setup I feel that I could benefit from running a 1.6 rocker on the exhaust. That would make it 218/218 .454/.483 versus 218/218 .454/.454. This should help with exhaust gas scavenging. Has anyone ever tried this?

-Ray
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 01:21 PM
carsavvycook's Avatar
My 2 cents worth
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Lakeside, CA
Age: 56
Posts: 2,844
Wiki Edits: 3

Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Yes I have tried this but after checking the rocker to valve geometry, I had to change the push rods to shorter ones on the exhaust to get it back in alignment in the center of the valve. It was more hassle than it was worth for the net gain, and did not seem to make any difference. I wound up ordering a different cam profile for the next race.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 02:55 PM
techinspector1's Avatar
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Last wiki edit: DynoSim combinations Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hemet, California, USA
Age: 71
Posts: 9,913
Wiki Edits: 326

Thanks: 140
Thanked 171 Times in 155 Posts
In most comparisons I've seen, the 1.6 rockers look like much ado about nothing.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 03:13 PM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,158
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 173 Times in 171 Posts
You'd probabily find more of a power gain by using the 1.6 rockers on the intake side. The exhaust responds more to valve timing duration changes than to lift changes.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 05-26-2008, 06:35 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: TN.
Posts: 287
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by F-BIRD'88
You'd probabily find more of a power gain by using the 1.6 rockers on the intake side. The exhaust responds more to valve timing duration changes than to lift changes.
good advise, right on the money.
Reply With Quote

Recent Engine posts with photos


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rocker arm ratios charlp703 Hotrodders' Lounge 4 01-05-2007 04:26 PM
split rocker arm.....? "SLOWMOE" Engine 7 07-28-2004 07:18 PM
Rocker ratios on small block chevy. KeithB123 Engine 4 12-01-2003 07:36 PM
rocker arm ratios molevolent_creations Engine 2 10-26-2003 05:09 PM
Rocker arm ratios chevypunk Engine 5 04-14-2003 10:02 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.