Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - Achieving Proper Rocker Arm Geometry
View Single Post
  #63 (permalink)  
Old 08-09-2012, 11:35 AM
Leoman's Avatar
Leoman Leoman is offline
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: leominster ma
Posts: 117
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
I know this is old stuff, and I didn't read every page so pardon me if I'm reposting known info, but this article in Circle Track is at variance with the well-known Comp Cams page.

Rocker Arm & Valve Train Geometry - Circle Track Magazine

It references both Miller and Smokey Yunick, and has some great drawings which show why a narrow roller track means more valve lift than a wide track.

I also emailed Comp on their diagram last year sometime, and never got a reply.

All this having been said, I can't imagine anybody who's, e.g., changing rocker arms, pulling the heads to change valve height (guess lash caps might work if you're lucky) just to get an extra .005 lift on a street motor. But the philosophy of a short roller track across the valve tip is correct, if real-world balanced against not having the pattern too far off-center. Note that the shorter the track, the closer you get to the ideal of having the exhaust-side limit of the roller track occur at mid-lift (not at full lift as Comp shows). Dead-centering really isn't necessary, nor IMO is having the lifter fully primed for checking unless you're racing and want every last .001 at any cost. Else, it's perfection versus the law of diminishing returns here.

Last edited by Leoman; 08-09-2012 at 11:47 AM.
Reply With Quote