My first post!
So I am putting together a engine from parts that have been sitting around.
Came across this article after degreeing my camshaft.
Chevy Small Block Cam - Super Chevy Magazine
Articles main findings;
The Power Of Separation
How much effect a wide vs. narrow lobe-separation angle has on power is precisely what we wanted to test, so Comp Cams ground five identical-duration solid roller camshafts with a different lobe-separation angle on each for us to try. The test was simple: Install all five cams straight up in the same engine with no changes in between. Since we wanted to cover the broadest separation spectrum for street cams, we asked Comp to grind 106-, 108-, 110-, 112-, and 114-degree lobe separations to see how that alone would affect power.
Our rather mild small-block was a 0.030-over 350 using a few good-breathing parts to make power. Basically, our tests showed that most of today's cam manufacturers have it correct when they grind their cams with a 108-110-lobe-separation angle, because it was within this range that our test motor worked the best. The difference in peak power, made between the best and worst cams, was more than 20 hp with the 108-lobe cam making the most at 475 hp and the 112-lobe cam making the least at 452 hp.
Read more: Chevy Small Block Cam - Super Chevy Magazine
My engine details are;
350cid-.030 dished pistons .025 in the hole
Vortec heads untouched with 7733sh1 .015 gaskets
Summit 1784 cam, identical to Crane 284 h012 (228/228,284/284,480/480 Lobe separation 112, lobe centers 107/117
Car is a 3350 lb Chevy Nova with th350,3000 stall and 3:73 gears.
Anyone have any thoughts on the article, specifically where they show the horse power gains from advancing cams to 108?
So I am putting together a engine from parts that have been sitting around.
Came across this article after degreeing my camshaft.
Chevy Small Block Cam - Super Chevy Magazine
Articles main findings;
The Power Of Separation
How much effect a wide vs. narrow lobe-separation angle has on power is precisely what we wanted to test, so Comp Cams ground five identical-duration solid roller camshafts with a different lobe-separation angle on each for us to try. The test was simple: Install all five cams straight up in the same engine with no changes in between. Since we wanted to cover the broadest separation spectrum for street cams, we asked Comp to grind 106-, 108-, 110-, 112-, and 114-degree lobe separations to see how that alone would affect power.
Our rather mild small-block was a 0.030-over 350 using a few good-breathing parts to make power. Basically, our tests showed that most of today's cam manufacturers have it correct when they grind their cams with a 108-110-lobe-separation angle, because it was within this range that our test motor worked the best. The difference in peak power, made between the best and worst cams, was more than 20 hp with the 108-lobe cam making the most at 475 hp and the 112-lobe cam making the least at 452 hp.
Read more: Chevy Small Block Cam - Super Chevy Magazine
My engine details are;
350cid-.030 dished pistons .025 in the hole
Vortec heads untouched with 7733sh1 .015 gaskets
Summit 1784 cam, identical to Crane 284 h012 (228/228,284/284,480/480 Lobe separation 112, lobe centers 107/117
Car is a 3350 lb Chevy Nova with th350,3000 stall and 3:73 gears.
Anyone have any thoughts on the article, specifically where they show the horse power gains from advancing cams to 108?