![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
B&M Holeshot converter opinions
Hello again everyone,
I was just wondering if any of you here have ever ran a B&M Holeshot converter? Some of you may remember the transmission woes I have been having. Well yesterday I snatched everything out. Basically the torque converter took a dump and started flaking metal into the transmission. Atleast the front pump in the transmission is broken, probably more, but my transmission guy hasn't had a chance to tear into it yet and tell for sure. Anyway, I am in the market for a new somewhat affordable torque converter. As always and with everyone, I am looking for the best converter I can get cheaply, with a max price of 350ish dollars. I was checking around, and came across the B&M Holeshot 3000. It advertises the stall range as 2800-3200, but it will usually stall higher than 3200 behind a big block (according to the B&M site.) My engine/cam combination call for a 2800 stall. B&M also has the Holeshot 2400, which advertises the stall range as 2300-2500, but it also says it will stall 200-300 RPM higher then that behind a big block (due to the amount of low end torque big blocks typically make). My question is should I get the B&M 3000 for 360ish dollars and be stalling in the 3400 range, or get the Holeshot 2400 for 240 dollars and be stalling in the 2700ish range? This is purely a street car that will see no more than a couple track visits just to see what it does, so a 4000 or higher stall, etc. is out of the question. I was reading on the TCI site, and it says the stall rating they give converters is based on a car having 250 ft/lbs of torque at 2500 RPMS. If you have less than that at 2500, it will stall less, or more at 2500 it will stall more. Well I ran my exact engine combo through desktop dyno which I realize isn't 100% accurate, but they had the motor producing 440 ft lbs at 2500 RPMS. Right now I am leaning towards the 2400 Holeshot, but I was wondering if I run the risk of breaking the converter due to "overstalling" or something it there is such a thing. I hope you guys understand what I am trying to say. Thanks a ton and any input you guys have is most appreciated. Rob |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Whatever you decide make sure you run a proper sized trans cooler |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
My SBC 400 puts out around 500 ft./lbs of torque. I am running a Tork Master 2,400 in it. So far it has held up.
I have a Holeshot 2,800-3,200 in my Ranchero. It is holding up well also. |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Thanks alot for the responses guys.
The car already has a really good "Hughes" Tranny cooler. I was also looking at the TorkMaster converters, but everything I read about them say they are not made to go behind big blocks. Thanks for the input guys, Rob |
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Quote:
So many to choose from.......... GOOD LUCK,bro |
![]() |
Back to top |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads for: "B&M Holeshot converter opinions"
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| TCI Stall Converter - Blown SB | 68NovaSS | Transmission - Rearend | 10 | 09-09-2008 12:42 PM |
| B&M Torque Converter | my350camaro84 | Transmission - Rearend | 4 | 07-07-2005 09:24 PM |
| B&M TORK CONVERTER ? | boss350 | Transmission - Rearend | 1 | 06-04-2005 10:18 AM |
| B&M stall converter | Lthompson | Transmission - Rearend | 6 | 11-29-2004 03:04 PM |
| possible bad toque converter? | Deadtemple | Transmission - Rearend | 9 | 10-11-2003 06:53 PM |