![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
best mods for a 1990 chevy 350
i have a 90 Chevy pick up 350 has an rv cam throttle body spacer and a few small upgrades what would be the next best thing to and or change?
|
|
||||||
|
Bogie, is there anything that can be done for these swirl-port heads that'll wake them up w/o resorting to heroic measures, porting-wise?
Or are they better left in the "don't bother" pile? |
|
||||
|
well i have an RV cam in that was put in by a miss understanding with the recent rebuilt motor that was put in and i have standard tranny. also i have a flowmaster 40 and im considering putting a glasspack or something like that.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Basically they are the cast iron 1980s-early 1990s Corvette L-98 head in cast iron with a vane cast on one side of the valve guide. They're super good for a low speed engine doing grunt work like a pickup hauling a ton of stuff in overdrive on the freeway. If you want to get over 4000 RPM with any power they need to be reworked or replaced. Yes the vane can be reduced or removed, but one needs to consider the cost of rebuilding the heads against just getting a new set. While I aimed the conversation at Vortecs because everybody on this planet has heard of them, the aftermarket like Dart and World provide very similar heads that will accept your existing intake at Vortec competitive prices. This really puts a jaundiced look on rebuilding the Swirl Ports. Your engine will respond to more cam or 1.6 rockers as I sighted without a head change and will also push the rev line up by virtue of holding the valve open further or longer, Longer being more in keeping with overcoming the limitations of port flow in the Swirl Port head than higher lift. Bogie |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Thanks. Quote:
Going to put them back on the roller block they came off of. Then put it into my '80 Malibu wagon. Last edited by cobalt327; 05-01-2009 at 03:48 PM. |
|
|||||
|
350 trucks are the ultimate sleeper
Well, nice to see someone has a shared interest. Okay, so the swirlport heads aren't the best, but what is?! If you have emissions requirements in your area, you can hardly get away with running old double humps with 2.02 and 1.66 valves and 64cc chambers now can we? If no emmisions are required, back date to 1960's fuelie heads, the double humps with the big valves, a single four and ram air. Simple as that. But, if you want to go new school, by all means, upgrade to Vortec heads, use an edelbrock or Holly manifold designed for such heads and TBI, upgrade to holly Venom injectors, keep your spacer and cam, slap a pair of Summit 1988-1995 Chevy Truck headers on it and have fun all day. 1990 to 1994 Chevy trucks were rated at 255 HP from the factory, take a wild guess to what all these mods bring it up to.
|
|
||||
|
Quote:
so some summit headers (long or short?)and the venom injects and a manifold will make a big difference? OK one more thing i have a flowmaster 40 I'm really considering a dynomax race bullet or some cherry bomb glass packs what would you recommend? |
|
|||||
|
Do you have single or dual ex?
That I suppose is the next question. By the way you worded that, you are still running the stock cat and y-pipe. Truly, there's no need for a muffler aft of the cat at all. I run my 1990 shortbed the exact same way, it has a decent low thunder, and is not too loud at all. Have a muffler delete (Or y-pipe) made or make it yourself, to go in place of the muffler, and still hook up to your tail pipes. (If you have more than one). That big 3" stock cat is a very good muffler anyway. Where I live, I have no emmisions testing at all, so on my 88 GMC I split it into true duals, and boy what a difference that made. (With no other mods at all, only duals.) And oh yes, the short 1988-1994 truck headers works just fine, They bolt right up to the factory y-pipes, and you can get them without the A.I.R injector ports for the off-road package trucks, and trucks that never came with an A.I.R pump. The long ones may give you a headache with having to create some custom plumbing, or interference with the T-case (If you have a 4X4). But they do perform better than the short variety. Glad to help any way I can.
Last edited by Speedshift_Sam; 05-07-2009 at 07:56 AM. Reason: missed a detail |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
I'm not sure that your year of truck poses this problem, but something else to check. |
|
||||
|
I bought a tbi motor months ago and the first thing to go on it were those heads. I ended up giving them to a guy at my machine shop.. who did not want them either.. but stated he could get $30 for them or so to buy him lunch for a couple of days.
I would not waste a penny doing anything to those heads. If you must use them, then do as Bogie already commented.. either the 1.6 and or a cam change. I would probably do the simplest/most effective which is a cam change. I look forward to seeing/getting comments from the Bogster because he always right on the money! |
|
||||
|
yea i bought the headers and should be here today i cant wait my engines really clean and with those stupid manifolds were really making me mad so i think I'm gonna be really happy. so what year is considered a classic because they don't have to have a sniffer test and all that correct? but really its not too loud with out a muffler so i wont get stopped or anything. haha lol
|
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| List all of your cars HERE! | Carbed95GT | Hotrodders' Lounge | 289 | 11-09-2011 06:43 PM |
| SBC 350 superiority rebuttle...was:POWERED BY CHEVY, WRITTEN ON A FORD, (from 'Engine | Oldsmolac911 | Hotrodders' Lounge | 50 | 01-12-2011 10:00 PM |
| Hi. just wondering why the 350 chevy small block is so good... | judgedredd | Hotrodders' Lounge | 78 | 06-25-2010 08:01 AM |
| 350 chevy help | joesnova2 | Engine | 7 | 11-08-2009 05:46 AM |
| radiator replacment in 1990 3/4 350 chevy | dandan42 | General Rodding Tech | 3 | 03-29-2007 05:28 AM |