Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread share on Facebook  
  #1  
Old 03-27-2009, 07:35 PM
powerhunter powerhunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 53
Wiki Edits: 4

Better or worse?tighter quench.

Im trying to build my first motor based on a friend of mines.It will be 10.8-1 compression with iron heads.Anyway I was wondering if swapping my 0.039 head gasket to a 0.020 one would help with detonation or make it worse because it would increase my compression to 11.4-1.My quench would be better with the thinner gasket at 0.045 as apposed to 0.064 with the thicker.Just wondering what you guys thought thanks.


Register now (free) or login to remove ads
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-27-2009, 07:49 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is online now
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 57
Posts: 12
Wiki Edits: 1,616

Is your build too far along to sub a piston w/a shallow (say, 8cc or so) D-shaped dish over the chamber?

A lot depends on the combo and use. Can you fill us in on that?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-27-2009, 07:57 PM
powerhunter powerhunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 53
Wiki Edits: 4

Well I dont really want to buy pistons cause i already spent $400.00 on dome pistons and got them pressed on my rods.They have a small 3.5 cc dome and my heads are 041 64cc 1970's.Im building it for high performance street only.Its a 350 chevy bored 30 over,4 bolt mains.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-27-2009, 07:58 PM
ericnova72's Avatar
ericnova72 ericnova72 is offline
More for Less Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: S.W. Lower Michigan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,977
Wiki Edits: 0

You're into the grey zone there, but I think it would be too much unless you are willing to mix in race gas
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:01 PM
powerhunter powerhunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 53
Wiki Edits: 4

My friend does it on 91 octane at 11-1 compression with camel hump heads but he has to knock his timing back.I really dont want to have to mix my gas.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-27-2009, 08:12 PM
ericnova72's Avatar
ericnova72 ericnova72 is offline
More for Less Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: S.W. Lower Michigan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,977
Wiki Edits: 0

Open up the chambers on the head to 69cc. This would help in three ways-- Allow you to close up the quench clearance, keep the comp ratio from being too high, and unshroud the valves for more flow.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-28-2009, 11:36 AM
automotive breath's Avatar
automotive breath automotive breath is offline
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 891
Wiki Edits: 0

Eric has the right answer. Open the chambers by unshrouding the valves
to lower the compression, then install the thinner head gasket to set
the squish clearance.

If the dome is solid, consider removing portions of the dome to lower the
compression further, target ~10.2:1 compression.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-28-2009, 02:06 PM
powerhunter powerhunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 53
Wiki Edits: 4

I don't really want to get into opening up the chambers because it would take away from the resale value of my heads if i switch to aluminum down the road.I also think my domes are hollow.But I thank you for your advice guys.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2009, 02:15 AM
ericnova72's Avatar
ericnova72 ericnova72 is offline
More for Less Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: S.W. Lower Michigan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,977
Wiki Edits: 0

What is the brand and part # of your pistons?

Heads are stock, no porting at all?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2009, 02:52 AM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
F-BIRD'88 F-BIRD'88 is offline
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 6,253
Wiki Edits: 0

Why did you copy your friends combo knowing that his won't run on your local pump gas without retarding the timing?
If he and the rest of us are limited by the laws of physics, what makes you think you are going to get a different or better result?

If we could actually do this with the pump fuel you got, with a SBC motor, why would the gas companies bother making hi octane gas for high compression ratio motors?

Pistons (the right piston for your motor) are cheap. Why not change the pistons? Its a lot easier and cheaper to do it now than later when the ring lands bust from engine knock.
Even the cheapest $80 flat top cast 350 piston will outlast a more expensive piston when the wrong piston (your domed pistons) is used while the engine is knocking.
If you are worried about reducing the potential resale value of your 041 heads,
Why not sell them now for some better flowing heads with larger chambers?

You have lots of workable solutions. Changing the pistons is the cheapest, and quickest and best cure. Anything worth doing is worth doing right.
http://store.summitracing.com/partd...30&autoview=sku
This is a great street/strip high performance hyper design piston. Its all the piston you need.
Sell your $400 piston mistake to some one else.
For every one building a 350 with flat tops and 64cc heads there is another using 70-76cc heads or wants 12:cr to go racing that needs your pistons.

With a flat top piston in your motor you'll get the right compression ratio and quench using a .015" to .026" head gasket. These are commonly available.
Build your motor correctly with correct workable compression ratio and set your timing for max performance (34 to 36deg) and go show your buddy how its done.

You need to throw a set of gears and a high stall in that car, with that 350 combo. (4.10-4.56)

Last edited by F-BIRD'88 : 03-29-2009 at 03:10 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-29-2009, 03:09 AM
techinspector1's Avatar
techinspector1 techinspector1 is offline
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Last wiki edit: DynoSim combinations Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: In da woods, Union County, North Carolina, USA
Age: 70
Posts: 8,769
Wiki Edits: 326

Posted by F-BIRD'88......
"Why did you copy your friends combo knowing that his won't run on your local pump gas without retarding the timing?
If he and the rest of us are limited by the laws of physics, what makes you think you are going to get a different or better result?"

Beautiful, just friggin' beautiful.

A 355 with 64cc heads, 0.025" piston deck height, 3.5cc dome pistons and a Victor Reinz 5746 head gasket that compresses to 0.025" will put your squish at 0.050" and your static compression ratio at 11.14:1. Screw the motor together and bolt on some water injection.....
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Snow...sQ5fAccessories
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Cool...sQ5fAccessories
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/NOS-...sQ5fAccessories

Do a search for water injection. There are a ton of units out there.....some good, some not so good....Heck, when you get the motor together and want a stopgap system until you can do better, get a windshield washer bag and pump off a Ford at the boneyard. Route a line into the top of the carb right in the middle so that it will spray down both barrels of your 4-bbl and use a tip that is drilled to 0.030". I have used an old blank carb jet before. Set the pump up with a microswitch that runs off the primary throttle blades and activates at around 1/4-1/2 throttle. Go to the drug store and get some isopropyl alcohol. Mix it 2 parts of alcohol to 3 parts of distilled water.

One 0.030" hole is 0.0007068 square inches. If you want to run two hoses, one to each throttle bore at the carb, then drill your tips 0.021". Two at 0.021" is 0.0006927 square inches.

Last edited by techinspector1 : 03-29-2009 at 03:39 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-29-2009, 08:05 AM
powerhunter powerhunter is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: canada
Posts: 53
Wiki Edits: 4

Thanks you guys , I think I will switch to flat tops, better to be safe then sorry the water injection is a cool idea but i think its a little more complex then just swapping pistons.Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-29-2009, 04:25 PM
Guy Hiltz's Avatar
Guy Hiltz Guy Hiltz is offline
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Nova Scotia Canada
Posts: 1,004
Wiki Edits: 0

powerhunter,here is a link to car shows & drag race schedule at Greenfield,if you're interested.Digby Scallop Days arent on there,but that car show will be around Aug 7.
Guy
http://www.maritimeclassiccars.com/disp_events_list.php
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-29-2009, 05:10 PM
ericnova72's Avatar
ericnova72 ericnova72 is offline
More for Less Racer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: S.W. Lower Michigan
Age: 45
Posts: 6,977
Wiki Edits: 0

Was curious as to what piston you had because if it is the TRW/Speed-pro Forged copy of the original LT-1 piston, then the dome can be machined to a flat top. Check your dome, if it is solid, just machine it. It ain't brain surgery!
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-29-2009, 07:26 PM
Hippie's Avatar
Hippie Hippie is offline
Analog man in a digital world.
 

Last journal entry: HEI comparison.
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,230
Wiki Edits: 0

I'm a little disappointed, some of the sharpest guys on here replying and I haven't seen DCR mentioned once. What cam are you running? That's going to have a big influence on what octane you can get buy with.

Check this out........

DCR Combinations that worked.


Quote:
Originally Posted by ericnova72
Was curious as to what piston you had because if it is the TRW/Speed-pro Forged copy of the original LT-1 piston, then the dome can be machined to a flat top. Check your dome, if it is solid, just machine it. It ain't brain surgery!


Check it carefully. The current Speed Pro "TRW" pistons aren't exact copies of the old TRW's. They may have the same part numbers and dome or dish configurations on top but that's where it ends. I compared a new L-2441 D-Cup to my old TRW L-2441's, they have the same D-Cup volume but that's where the similarity ends. The current ones are a different weight, pin height is .020" closer to the top which means the new ones will be that much farther down the bore and the internal structure is different.

Last edited by Hippie : 03-29-2009 at 07:35 PM. Reason: Added link.
Reply With Quote

Back to top


Recent Engine posts with photos


Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Similar Threads for: "Better or worse?tighter quench."
ThreadThread StarterForumRepliesLast Post
quench and detonation71javelinEngine1011-14-2007 07:20 PM
Quick Quench QuestionarchEngine4808-25-2004 01:16 AM
Tight QuenchDelirious2000Engine1802-28-2004 08:09 PM
Need help with a timing issue...383MontecarloSSEngine3001-01-2004 08:24 AM
Compression Ratio advice new vortecsblndweaselEngine806-11-2003 06:02 PM



Powered by: vBulletin Version 3.0.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:53 AM.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.