![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
It's all in the heads. If you use a CARB legal head like Brodix and others make (the Brodix is just an example), along w/a CARB legal cam, carb and headers/exhaust, you can make a LOT more than 300 HP- legally.
|
|
|||||
|
Thank you Cobalt, that's what I was really hoping to hear, and had suspected, but do not have enough experience to know. Looks like I'll just be freshening up the build with some new slugs and a different set of heads.
I really want to stay with stock exhaust manifolds and the stock carb though. So I'm hoping it's still feasible with those restrictions. Most headers would give me clearance problems with my front driveshaft, and the Q-Jet I have right now works better than almost any aftermarket carb out there as far as mpg, low RPM performance, and good performance up steep grades. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
This is my first truck and will continue its life with me FOREVER. lol |
|
||||||
|
The Q-jet is an excellent carb, as you have found. And there is no reason you can't make well into the 400HP range w/that same Q-jet, possibly w/some tuning. But the basic Q-jet itself will not hold you back from your goals, plus will provide a very responsive engine and the best MPG that you can expect to get from a performance engine, short of a full-on EFI $et-up.
The stock exhaust manifolds are another story altogether. I don't know your reasoning behind keeping them, I will just say that there are CARB exempt headers for that engine should you change your mind. Being a 4X4, there will be clearance issues w/most "long tube" headers. "Block hugger" or "shorty" headers may fit w/o problems, I'm not positive on this, though- so it would need to be researched. With some exhaust systems, a floor shifter is mandatory, BTW. So swapping exhaust gets complicated, depending on how your rig is equipped as it sits (floor or column shifter, etc.). A suggestion is to hook up w/a 4 Wheeler club in your area, attend Off Road gatherings and look into the many 4WD and truck forums online (not that we want to lose you here). Good luck. |
|
|||||
|
My reasoning for keeping stock manifolds is the fact that I can't find shorty headers with AIR provisions. I've seen one mid-length offer, but I don't think it will be feasible with my truck. Nothing out there gives the kind of clearance that these do while retaining smog requirements.
I don't need it to be as powerful as it can be, just a little more than it is now. So I'm thinking just put some new slugs/rings and some better GM heads with smaller combustion chambers for a compression boost. A mild low-RPM hydraulic cam/lifter setup, and a rebuild/tune on the Q-Jet. I'll probably be in here this winter asking about heads and a cam combo for it. LOL
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
What they have, is one large fitting on the driver side manifold, back by the outlet to plumb the AIR pump into. The manifolds look to be maybe a bit larger than earlier Gen 1 SBC log-type manifolds, but I cannot say that w/certainty, as I don't have an older set to compare them to. That said, there'd prolly not be a significant difference between them and what you have- something like 5-10 HP as a WAG. The Vortec heads lack a heat crossover, so plumbing a functional EGR would be a problem, too. Might be worth some research, in any event. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Long Awaited 400 SBC Dyno Results | Mad Maggot | Engine | 19 | 10-14-2011 07:29 PM |
| 427 sbc out of a 400 | camaro409 | Engine | 23 | 08-02-2009 09:25 AM |
| a budget 383 stroker build using a stock 400 GM Crank | Mustangsaly | Engine | 8 | 10-15-2007 12:57 PM |
| SBC Strokers - 350 vs 400 Blocks & Combos (not just 383 & 406) | ez2cdave | Engine | 11 | 05-21-2007 09:34 PM |
| 400 SBC Newbie | thecamaroguy | Engine | 13 | 12-08-2004 08:09 AM |