![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
C-6 blues
All 302/5.0, 351W/5.8, and 351Clevelands use the same bellhousing bolt pattern. The transmissions from any of those engines can be bolted to any of the others.
C-6's came with heavy duty 302 packages, in pickups, and behind most 351W and 351C engines, unless it was equiped with an FMX transmission. I guess the question I would have is why go with a C-6, when the C-4 is quite capable of doing the job, is a lot lighter in weight, and doesnt steal as much power as a C-6, not to mention more plentiful, and less exspensive. |
|
||||||
|
well for some reason I've told myself that i think a C6 will hold more horse and torque then the C4 . Now im not saying im right but I've pretty much talked myself in to it.
|
|
||||||
|
C-4 vs C-6
Yes, in fact the C-6 will take more power than will the C-4, however, C-4's have been known to take on 600 hp in stock trim and survive it, for a long time. The biggest detriment6 to either of those transmissions, be it the C-4 or C-6 are doing line loads on them for dragracing (harmful to any auto trans as it generates extreme amounts of heat, burning the fluid) and doing manual 1-2 shifts, with a stock valve body. The reason this is damaging is because when you shift manually, the transmission wants to shift up first, then back to 2. According to one article I read several years ago, put out by one of the Transmissoin gurus, that you reduce the life of these transmissions by 2 shifts every time you do one manual shift from 1 to 2. IF you like to shift your own gears, then I would suggest you get a shift kit, as it will alter the plumbing to eliminate the weak point of manual shifts with the stock valve body.
As a point of trivia, Ford made a bellhousing for the M blocks in the mid 70's that would bolt the C-4 to them. Vertually every one of those bellhousings that have ever wound up in a junk yard or garage or whatever, has been scavanged up for guys runnning 429's and 460's in dragracing. If a C-4 (worke over of course) will take that kind of beating, it should stand up well to a street engine. The M (351/400)block and the Lima (429/460) block use the same bellhousing bolt pattern. In the case of them using C-4's behind the Lima block, its the bellhousing that tend to crack and break after a period of time due to the extreme torque, not the transmission itself. |
|
|
| Recent Transmission - Rearend posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Progressive Linkage On Blower Carbs Setup? | 5-7heaven | Engine | 6 | 10-07-2007 10:30 AM |
| 68 mustang kickdown linkage | fla68rustang | Transmission - Rearend | 0 | 08-09-2005 07:33 PM |
| Firebird and Camaro clutch linkage | BanditT/A | Transmission - Rearend | 1 | 10-25-2004 09:13 PM |
| C6 specs versus C4 | k2mooch | Transmission - Rearend | 2 | 05-19-2004 10:06 AM |
| clutch linkage!!? | chevyelc81 | Transmission - Rearend | 11 | 08-01-2002 06:46 AM |