![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
|||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Cam - Computer .vs. Non
Hi all,
I'm in the midst of a mild 350 build-up and am down to 2 cam choices, one is a Crane, the other is Comp. There are others on the list, but these are shortlisted. here are the specs: Crane (114142) RPM: 2.2-5.2 ADV: 272/284 @50: 216/228 Lift: .454/.480 LSA: 112 Comp: (12-209-2) RPM: 2.0-6.0 ADV: 275/277 @50: 216/229 Lift: .462/.482 LSA: 110 My target is about 300hp +/- 25 (probably minus!) and I'd like to get at least matching torque at the bottom/midrange. The crappy (cracky!) heads I'm using are the 624s with 202/160 valves with some very mild cleanup/port matching. Pistons are KBs and good for about 9:1. At this point I'm more about building the bottom-end up, so the top is more of a budget. I have the 670 Holley SA and a Weiand Stealth intake. Bottom line question is, after all this.. ahaha. the Crane says it is for computer-assisted vehicles.. but I like the spec. Q1) Is there something I am missing in the spec or the construction of the cam that I cannot use it for a non-computer setup? Q2) Any other cam you might recommend for this mild build? Regards and thanks, Nigel |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
That cam will work just fine in a non-ECM engine. As far as other cams, you might take a peak at the Comp 12-238-2 XE262H. I have talked to a couple people with that cam in 350's very similar to yours and they love it. One was in a '69 Malibu with a 9.5 to 1 355, 200-4R and rear gear unknown. He said it was very well mannered in traffic and his best ET with it was a 13.54 @ 99 MPH. I am seriously considering it for a 383 SBC project I have started. Both peole said it pulled hard to 5500.
Comp: (12-238-2) XE262-H RPM: 1300-5600 ADV: 262/270 @50: 218/224 Lift: .462/.479 LSA 110 |
|
#3
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Thanks Hippie ... that's great to know!
The Comp cam you speak of was on my list but was the most aggressive of all of them (44/46 degrees Adv-@50). As my heads are a weak point, I didn't want to pummel the poor b*stards (i.e. seats) with a harder cam. The 114142 and the 12-209-2 are less stressful at 56/56 and 56/48 respectively, and have a little higher exhaust lift to help scavenge. Thanks again for your help Regards, Nigel |
|
#4
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Looks like you've done your homework. Yeah the XE's do have pretty aggressive ramps and I have heard compalints on some of the larger ones of excessive valvetrain noise from the valves closing so quickly although neither person with the 262 mentioned it, in fact one said you could barely tell it had a cam at idle. I'd probably lean toward the Comp you listed if the XE isn't an option but the difference between the two would probably be minimal.
|
![]() |
Back to top |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads for: "Cam - Computer .vs. Non"
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| HELP cam, intake, carb | 64 nova | Engine | 9 | 07-12-2005 09:39 PM |
| Basic Computer Safety | strikingthematch | Hotrodders' Lounge | 6 | 02-03-2005 03:12 AM |
| flattened cam | 383vette | Engine | 7 | 05-04-2004 09:02 AM |
| Smoked computer during start | Chadman | Engine | 3 | 08-20-2003 11:12 AM |
| Interesting Question on cam | DoubleVision | Engine | 3 | 01-31-2003 10:31 PM |