![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
I built a 351w last year stoked it out to 411. The guy I built for had 94 f350 he wanted to keep his EFI so that limit us to what we could do. The 351w is a great engine to stroke. As far as bb or sb it's up to you. The results either way is going to be a lot of power and a lot of fun. Since you already have 351w block I would go with that one.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
If it were me I would build a 460 and stroke it big. Summit has rotating kits for like 540ci. You will make gobs of torque and would be a pretty sick ride. I believe 600hp on a 351 block will be pushing towards the limit of the block.
|
|
|||||
|
well, I found out the 351W longblock I have is a D4AE which from what I understand is one of the better pre-'75 351W blocks and are "suppose" to handle upwards of 700HP. Not saying I am going small block for sure but having a good 351W block to start with isn't a bad think if I do...
D= 70's era 4= being the year so its a 74 tall deck (9.503 IIRC) |
|
||||||
|
I don`t think your going to reach 600 horsepower with a small block without the assistance of a blower or turbocharger, especially on 93 octane pump gas. If you plan on this to be streetable 600 horses is out of the question in a small block package. You want 600 horses you`ll have to go big block and for as many inches as possible.
|
|
|||||
|
You're going to have to go pretty radical (roller cam, good port job, etc. ) to get 600 hp from a small block; but you can do it...and probably not with a blower.
600 hp from a big block is easier to attain, with less modification.....which translates to more durability. |
|
||||
|
I found this build last year and thought it sounded perfect for my '66 Mustang because it was a small block and it made ludicrous amounts of power for a reasonable amount of cash. Check it out http://www.popularhotrodding.com/tec...sor/index.html
|
|
||||||
|
A 600 HP 514 in a stock bodied '73 Mach 1......? You're going to have to do a whole lot more suspension work than just at the front. The BB is going to make that car even more nose heavy than it already is. IIRC weight transfer was never one of the '71-'73 Mustangs strong points. I had a '72 Grande with a 302 and it was real light in the back end. The Mach's had a little more weight out back but.......
If it was me I'd be going for the Windsor, it will make a lot nicer package in the long run. But that's me. |
|
||||||
|
I'm with Hippie on this one
What do you think your planning to do with 600 hp and no telling how much torque? To have fun with this car on the street you don't need a mega $$$ build. Your going to have to back half it with tubs if you want it to hook on the strip at those power levels and forget cracking the throttle on the street, as you'll have to decide which ditch it's going for and then catch it before it gets there. I have 10 yrs. (a few of those it was my daily driver) behind the wheel of my factory 390 powered 67 mustang before I took it apart so I could keep a drivers license. With a mild CJ cam and lowered compression this wouldn't hook for squat. If it thought about hooking up it broke something. These cars flex and twist literally, when under high torque I could feel the drivers floorboard move under my feet as I went through the gear box. My car is a 1 owner that my dad bought new so I know it's not a banged up tin can that's been patched together. Just a few questions you should ask yourself before jumping on the mega band wagon. Tony |
|
|
| Recent Hotrodding Basics posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| SBF stroker combo | mike69 | Engine | 7 | 09-02-2009 09:05 PM |
| Transmission guidance for SBF stroker motor? | ctfortner | Transmission - Rearend | 2 | 02-27-2009 06:50 PM |
| 383 Stroker Question | thebellman | Engine | 3 | 02-01-2007 02:56 PM |
| 302, biggest stroker capacity? | 6-712dr73xa | Engine | 7 | 02-03-2006 11:28 AM |
| 347 SBF stroker questions | AlaskanTide | Engine | 4 | 05-28-2003 03:40 PM |