![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
You are looking up the wrong tree..what the difference is is the better ability of the disk brake to dissipate heat. Brakes work by converting motion energy to heat and the disk is far superior in that regard..as long as the pressure in the brake system is able to lock the brakes up you have plenty of pressure..Brake heat is why the builders have gone to the larger tire and wheel size to allow for larger disks. heat is also why you will find carbon fiber and ceramics used in high performance brakes in cars such as the super cars..
Sam
__________________
I have tried most all of it and now do what is known to work.. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
My 13 year old has asked me over and over how the disc brake can be better when the pads area is so much smaller than the drum brakes shoe, thanks for the good explanation that I can now pass on to him.
Brian |
|
||||||
|
It is also real easy to do a drum brake job wrong. If the drums are turned, you cant use standard shoes. You will loose a good portion of the contact area as the radius of the drums will not match the shoes. They will eventually wear in but that will take quite some time.
Back when I was in school, and it was mostly drum brakes, the rule of thumb was 1 square inch of shoe for every 100lbs of vehicle weight. Disk brakes are not greatly affected by heat or water. Drum brakes were terrible when wet.
__________________
Artificial Intelligence is no match for Natural Stupidity Chet |
|
||||||
|
Funny you should mention this just as I am getting dressed to go out and install my rear drum brakes on my Rambler. I remember my brother had a shoe "recurve" cutter of some sort to match shoes to drums. I also remember seeing guys give the shoe a firm whack with a large hammer to take a little of the curve out of them so they fit the drum better.
Brian |
|
|||||
|
Piston area alone cannot be compared. For disk brakes, the piston area acts directly on the pads. For drum brakes, the pistons push on one end of the shoes and there is a lever affect. Drum brakes are also self-energizing in most cases. Finally, pad or shoe area is irrelevant for ultimate braking area. Friction force is simply normal force times the coefficient of friction. Larger pads won't give you any more stopping power. Larger pad area only lowers the PSI force on the pad material, which is a lining materials properties issue. As the pads get larger, the surface pressure is lower and the pads last longer. Also, larger pads do dissipate heat over more area. The friction properties of the pad material may change as it gets hotter.
|
|
||||||
|
no reason to compare disc vs drum
I know there is absolutely no merit for comparing drum vs. disc performance data.
My car has both drum and disc...I am easily amused ...I thought any data would be neat. |
|
|||||
|
When I switched the 8 lug drum brakes to discs on my 64 Bonneville, I noticed two things;
-The discs kept the car straight during panic stops. -The 11" drums stopped the car faster... Sometimes I wish I would of did more work to the old 8 lug system.. It did look the best.. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
I remember a road test from 65 when Corvette went to four wheel disc. The panic stop the year before with the 64 all drum vette yielded one stop from 100 and the next stop was about twice as far and after that it wouldn't even stop. In 65 with the four wheel discs they made about 10 panic stops with no difference and just gave up. Disc makes a BIG difference. Brian |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Racing around town in my 67 drum/drum in 1979. That's when I learned the limits of drum brakes. O my surprise when the hot drum brakes wouldn't slow the beast. Stopped by a nose. Learned my lesson for the day. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Oh Heck yeah they were awesome. And you know what, I had an experimental set from a 58 Ford T-Bird at one time! Yep, Kelsey Hayes made with the same basic design, I looked all over for documentation on them, close as I came was a late 50's Continental concept car Ford had made that never got anywhere. I sold them on Ebay (this was about 10 years ago). Don't remember what I got but I wish I had them today and continue researching them. Brian |
|
|
| Recent Suspension - Brakes - Steering posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Weight of Disc Brakes vs Drum Brakes | leejoy | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 7 | 06-29-2007 12:41 AM |
| Dent Repair | Randy Ferguson | Body - Exterior | 25 | 11-26-2005 09:00 PM |
| Monte Carlo rear disc brakes question... ? | berkelusa | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 2 | 09-29-2003 08:57 AM |
| Hotrodders Knowledge Cluster: Disc Brake Conversions | Jon | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 0 | 08-29-2003 03:34 PM |
| disc brakes for 1968 ford galaxie | chevblazk5 | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 2 | 08-13-2003 02:58 PM |