![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
hmm really? i was not expecting it to be that low with the 60 cc heads. but ill trust you guys and go ahead with the thinner gasket to bump it up. What about the intake? ive been told it would need a thicker gasket but it seems to line up fine.
|
|
|||||
|
i can't figure out how to edit so sorry for all the posts but i wasn't very descriptive the first time. its a 350 of course. bored 30 over the heads are 461 castings and have 2.02 and 1.60 valves installed and they have been shaved to 60 cc so i dont know if that changes anything but just incase
|
|
|||||
|
Quench for the Camels
Quote:
I forget the flush velocity differential estimates between .038" and .058", but whatever it is, it was surprising the first time I heard it, like more than a 100%, maybe more than 200.. Someone here knows, I'm sure. Remember it probably takes .020" off the earlier heads to equal the CR increase of of .010" off the deck, but no matter how much the heads are cut, moving the chamber closer to the piston, the quench area stays the same distance from the piston. OK, for example, A customer comes to the shop with a 10/1 4vr flat top 350, he wants to freshen it and keep his forged slugs, and is now considering different heads to lower CR. Because last time it was built he did it himself with the intentional CR increase, using 461s for more power in his tow truck. Comments that he's been struggling with spark knock from the beginning. We deck it down to about .004" in the hole, new rings/cam bearings ect and RV cam...Call him to come get it. He re-installs the same heads. Month later is towing without spark knock and claims he's got 50 more horses, and getting 13 mpg, up from 10. He's probably got 40 more usable foot lbs, and no more horses but he's happy. I apologize if you already know all this stuff, but there may be a guest following your thread, who has never considered it. Duntov
|
|
|||||
|
no honestly i know nothing when it comes to engine building. I fix cars all day. But in my shop when it comes to engines i remove and replace. Im still extremely confused. If im understanding this correctly you are all saying im going to have pinging problems unless i use a thin head gasket or get my block decked to get rid of some quench? Please forgive me if im completely off track.
|
|
|||||
|
New recommendation >>>Stick 'um on and go...
Quote:
But I rethought it this morning, and I think if you just installed the heads you have on the bottom end you have and spend a few bucks extra on the thinner coated steel shim gaskets the other poster mentioned, you'd be running good that quick and easy. I might take the opportunity to go with a MTC1 which is a small RV cam which is fine for the pistons you have. Be torquey and good on gas. Most people like the combo for driveability....///slash tire spinning. You're fine, <<>>New recommendation >>>Stick 'um on and go... Duntov |
|
|||||
|
http://www.summitracing.com/parts/FPP-1094/ thats what i need right? theres a cheaper one at .016 for ten dollars each but i figured might as well get the better quality for twenty extra
|
|
||||||
|
I've never had a failure using the cheapy plain jane non coated steel shim gasket even at 12.65:1 cr and with nitrous. Install clean dry and oil free. Use black RTV automotive sealant on the head bolt threads and under the hex only. Retorque the head bolts after initial run in.
|
|
|||||
|
I like the coated
Quote:
One of the things I do though when installing heads is to grind the hex off some long bolts and saw a screw slot in the top, to use for guide pins to make sure the heads rest down strait to the dial pins without bumping the gasket. That makes for lower stress for me too. Also we use teflon pipe dope from the plumbing store on the threads because it doesn't cure out before you've had a chance to re torque even days apart. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| compression ratio compared to compression PSI | squids1 | Engine | 14 | 12-28-2010 11:36 PM |
| Compression Ratio? | 72chevyC/10 | Engine | 3 | 09-12-2005 04:21 PM |
| How to figure compression ratio...... | classic_chevy_guy | Engine | 9 | 07-26-2005 09:59 PM |
| 383 Chevy Compression Ratio? | Skunk | Engine | 5 | 07-06-2005 07:07 AM |
| 327 compression ratio | dadsgp | Engine | 4 | 06-23-2005 08:42 PM |