![]() |
|
|
|
||||
|
connecting rod question.
hi guys, i just bought a eagle 383 rotating assembly for my 97 silverado.im looking to build this engine myself since i cut out all the guess work by buying everything as a kit.my question is: is there a certain position that the connecting rod is supposed to face in cunjunction to the front of the block?i know that by looking at the rods i can see that 1 side is chamfered more that the other at the big end of the rod. the rod themselves dont have any other indication that tells me which side goes towards the front of the block other than 2 letters that are stamped ES. does this even matter which way the rods are facing in the motor?
the pistons have just 2 valve reliefs right next to each other not 2 on top and 2 on the bottom which tells me that the reliefs must be towards the top of the block.so i know which way the pistons go i just want to make sure the connecting rods are installed facing the right position as well if it applies. any info would be greatly appreciated.
|
|
||||
|
thanks jim. let me ask u another question, i keep hearing about the eagle rods having issues. do u think this kit is fine for my truck? i mostly use it to tow my trailer and car,and maybe some visits to the local homedepot. im not at all going to crazy with the engine,just want something a bit more stout than the tired 350 thats in it.
|
|
||||||
|
Main problem with the Eagle rods is the big end/journal end being egg shaped or out of round when the caps are torqued down. May want to have a shop check them before you install to be sure.
|
|
||||
|
the rods are brand new and never been installed,there are balanced from the company and i also have the spec card that came with it.do u still recommend them be checked before install? or does this apply to reusing them in the future ? u guys are a great help,i appreciate it very much.
|
|
||||||
|
Have both the rods and crankshaft very carefully checked, there are known numerous issues with both.
You will probably end up having to have the rods resized and the crankshaft turned to make within specs and useable. Not a bad idea to upgrade the rod bolts, while the work is being done. |
|
||||
|
will do,the rods already have the arp cap stye bolts in the rods.i will look into having the rods and the crank checked.just to be safe. i would of never though of having them checked even if they were new,shows how great this site is. thanks guys enjoy the holidays
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
assuming the rods are not round and i put this engine together,would the oil pressure be affected in any way or are there more catastrophic consequenses here?
|
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Connecting Rod Clearance question | newdad1 | Engine | 13 | 09-18-2007 08:57 PM |
| Rod length discussion, split from previous thread | seriousracer | Engine | 11 | 06-29-2007 12:27 PM |
| 351W Con Rod question... | Schramm | Engine | 10 | 11-16-2005 05:30 AM |
| Ford 302 Connecting Rod question | 66StangBoy | Engine | 3 | 09-13-2004 03:26 PM |
| Removing connecting rod caps | jdreher | Engine | 1 | 03-24-2004 02:31 PM |