Did I make a mistake not installing DROP SPINDLES??? - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Suspension - Brakes - Steering
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2010, 10:52 AM
renfroe453's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: kentucky
Posts: 68
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Did I make a mistake not installing DROP SPINDLES???

Guys, I don't really have a question, but I am hoping for a little advise, especially from someone that may be familiar with a Chevelle.

I spent the winter months completely rebuilding my front and rear suspension and did a lot of powder coating and dress-up work at the same time. You can take a look at my "photo album" to see some pictures of the completed suspension. Now that this project is completed, I regret not installing 2" drop spindles on my 68 Chevelle. The car already has a nice stance, but I think this would have improved the stance, as well as the handling of the car.

If I add them now, I will need to either modify my freshly powder coated dust covers, or remove them all together. Are there any other issues that I may not be aware of if I add the drop spindles to my car. The manufacturer tells me that there will be no other modifications required.

Your advise and options would be greatly appreciated.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2010, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: VA/NC
Posts: 7
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hey man great job. Love the detail. I have not dealt with a Chevelle, but I had to install lift spindles for my wifes 94 Burb. Wasn't too much trouble. The only advice I would give is have 12'' C-clamps on hand. Made it a little easier. Like I said, nothing major, just some finesse getting it all to line up. Have fun.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2010, 11:55 AM
renfroe453's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: kentucky
Posts: 68
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks for the information.

I am not too worried about doing the work, since I just did it all a couple of months ago.

I am just wandering if there is enough advantage to drop spindles for me to re-do the spindles again before spring gets here.

Thanks
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2010, 04:19 PM
38mike's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois
Age: 58
Posts: 291
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2" more drop??

Quote:
Originally Posted by renfroe453
I am just wandering if there is enough advantage to drop spindles for me to re-do the spindles again before spring gets here.

Thanks
The advantage would mostly be the visual impact. I personally really like the stance you have now, but IF you think you would like the nose-down look, then go for it. Be advised, though, that 2" will be very noticeable. Right now, you appear to be pretty level...with a 2" drop, it will definitely be called nose-down.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-14-2010, 05:39 PM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Wheelbase database Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,051
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 1
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
The aftermarket dropped spindles for the A-body cars use an integrally forged caliper mount. This is different from the stock bolt on caliper mount. I doubt the stock dust shields can be used.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 06:11 AM
Bryan59EC's Avatar
Car? Truck? Who Cares
 

Last journal entry: First week of December
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 52
Posts: 2,266
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Lowering springs will actually improve the steering / suspension geometry.

Might try that first.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 07:29 AM
Cape Cod Bob's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: How to title a hot rod Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: MA
Posts: 1,079
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
DO NOT ,I repeat, DO NOT touch that stance. Great job, great look,. FANTASTIC.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 08:36 AM
renfroe453's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: kentucky
Posts: 68
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Bob
DO NOT ,I repeat, DO NOT touch that stance. Great job, great look,. FANTASTIC.
Hey guys, thanks for all the pointers.

It looks as though I am going to follow the advise of CAPE COD BOB.

Thanks again.
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 08:57 AM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Wheelbase database Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,051
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 1
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan59EC
Lowering springs will actually improve the steering / suspension geometry.

Might try that first.
Um, how is that? The suspension geometry is defined by the height of the spindle, the length of the control arms, and the locations of the pivot points. Changing the spring height MIGHT put the suspension in a more advantageous part of the suspension travel with the car at ride height, but it doesn't change the geometry.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 09:00 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Napa , Ca.
Posts: 279
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
I agree with Cape Cod Bob, I think it looks great the way it sits now. If you lower it 2 more inches in front then you will have to lower the rear. Then you'll have to watch out for speed bumps. The weather is going to get better soon , drive it and enjoy it then maybe rethink lowering it more next winter.
IMO I would leave it where it at. I have a 69 SS396 Chevelle and it sits at stock height , if I lower it any I'll be scraping my headers, oil pan and bellhousing on everything. Plus my wife drives it also.
Gene
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 12:21 PM
Bryan59EC's Avatar
Car? Truck? Who Cares
 

Last journal entry: First week of December
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 52
Posts: 2,266
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by joe_padavano
Um, how is that? The suspension geometry is defined by the height of the spindle, the length of the control arms, and the locations of the pivot points. Changing the spring height MIGHT put the suspension in a more advantageous part of the suspension travel with the car at ride height, but it doesn't change the geometry.
Okay----I may have mis-spoken

This is an A-body thing I guess, but lowering springs are supposed to put the arms more in the center of the travel. Wheels stay more to the verticle in a turn, and don't lean over as much.

This is stuff I have gleaned from Team Chevelle-----have not done it myself, as I think I will keep the stock height on my 66----But if I do ever lower it, I will not use spindles. (have OEM 72 Disc spindles---wanna keep em)

I have drop spindles on my 79 C-10 and my 59 Elky-----need 1/2 acre to get one of these cars turned around. U-turn in town---near impossible.

Again--not a suspension guru----but try to absorb as much stuff that I can from those Chevell fanatics.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 05:21 PM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Wheelbase database Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,051
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 1
Thanked 32 Times in 31 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan59EC
This is an A-body thing I guess, but lowering springs are supposed to put the arms more in the center of the travel. Wheels stay more to the verticle in a turn, and don't lean over as much.
OK, that makes more sense.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 03-15-2010, 08:44 PM
aosborn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Suspension: designs, shapes, sizes Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 594
Wiki Edits: 7

Thanks: 0
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan59EC
Okay----I may have mis-spoken

This is an A-body thing I guess, but lowering springs are supposed to put the arms more in the center of the travel. Wheels stay more to the verticle in a turn, and don't lean over as much.

This is stuff I have gleaned from Team Chevelle-----have not done it myself, as I think I will keep the stock height on my 66----But if I do ever lower it, I will not use spindles. (have OEM 72 Disc spindles---wanna keep em)

I have drop spindles on my 79 C-10 and my 59 Elky-----need 1/2 acre to get one of these cars turned around. U-turn in town---near impossible.

Again--not a suspension guru----but try to absorb as much stuff that I can from those Chevell fanatics.
I think what he may be going after here, is with lowering springs, generally speaking, the lower control arm and tie-rod end tend to be closer to level at ride height and that can help with bump steer issues. That along with the upper control arm at more of an angle (high on the outboard end) helps with negative camber gain on the loaded (outboard) side of the suspension when cornering. All good things generally. With drop spindles that are exact replacements for the original except the spindle height, you don't receive any of the other potential advantages.

Andy
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010, 05:58 AM
Bryan59EC's Avatar
Car? Truck? Who Cares
 

Last journal entry: First week of December
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 52
Posts: 2,266
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Thanks, Andy

I just hate it when I know what I want to say---just can't figure out how to say it

Pretty sure I am not the only one with this problem
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 03-16-2010, 05:15 PM
Member
 
Last wiki edit: Vacuum brake bleeder set up
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: So Cal
Posts: 1,245
Wiki Edits: 8

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cape Cod Bob
DO NOT ,I repeat, DO NOT touch that stance. Great job, great look,. FANTASTIC.
I'm with him. The gap between the wheel and wheel arches looks exactly the same which is what gives the best visual look. It looks perfect the way it is
Reply With Quote

Recent Suspension - Brakes - Steering posts with photos


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Early Ford Spindles fitting early Ford axles pasadenahotrod Suspension - Brakes - Steering 3 08-14-2012 07:20 PM
conversion 1 1/2 drop spindles shagginwagonvic Suspension - Brakes - Steering 1 04-30-2002 06:44 PM
drop spindles for 63 impala PikFabrications Suspension - Brakes - Steering 0 02-15-2002 10:19 PM
Should I use drop spindles? 57Chevyman Suspension - Brakes - Steering 6 12-12-2001 10:38 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.