Drove my new "toy" - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion> Hotrodders' Lounge
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2011, 08:57 PM
jessicafd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 51
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Drove my new "toy"

I drove my new "toy" to work today for the first time,my 2011 Camaro and I am impressed.A couple of my employees wanted to touch it and I told them no,it is my baby.It is a dark blue with the SS package,6.2 V8 and automatic transmission.I even beat a bone stock 1997 Ford Mustang GT with it.Guy saw it and said it could not beat his mustang.Was dead wrong,smoked him off the line.I am learning about it and will be breaking it in.Will be installing an Edelbrock E Force supercharger on it later on with upgraded exhaust and headers.Even picked my son from school with it and I had a crowd looking at it.My son says it is a cool car.I always wanted one and now have one.Least it is broken in.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2011, 09:00 PM
Blazin72's Avatar
You got a leaky spark tube...
 
Last wiki edit: Rearend removal
Last journal entry: General Lee
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Union, WA
Age: 31
Posts: 2,866
Wiki Edits: 19

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
A 6.2L Camaro SS better beat a 97 4.6L Mustang. Given the 160+ hp difference... Not really even worth comparing....
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2.jpg
Views:	36
Size:	77.0 KB
ID:	54232  
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2011, 09:13 PM
jessicafd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 51
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My new Camaro did beat this mustang,I saw the owner of the mustang was embarassed beaten by a Camaro.It has power and took my employee Gregory for a ride during our lunch break.Came out and saw the look on his face.I am a Camaro fanatic and don't like the Ford Mustang anyway
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2011, 09:55 PM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Mopar tapered axle rear brake conversion
Last journal entry: What I'm doing now...
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,263
Wiki Edits: 49

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessicafd
My new Camaro did beat this mustang,I saw the owner of the mustang was embarassed beaten by a Camaro.It has power and took my employee Gregory for a ride during our lunch break.Came out and saw the look on his face.I am a Camaro fanatic and don't like the Ford Mustang anyway
His point was that YOU should be embarrassed, given that YOUR car has a 160 hp advantage over the Mustang. Now, try doing that to a 6.1 (392 Hemi) Challenger. If you can pull that off THEN you can brag about it.

Centerline
HotRodsAndHemis.com

“I wrote to the head man at General Motors and said, "I`m gonna have to desert you if you don't stop making cars for women." - John Wayne
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2011, 10:18 PM
Overdriv's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2005
Location: IL
Age: 63
Posts: 723
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Since the Challenger came up in this thread. Does the 6.1 have a different rear suspension than the smaller moter version, what 5.7???

Does the Camaro have active traction control?

ETA: Congratulation on your new toy.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 04-05-2011, 10:19 PM
johnsongrass1's Avatar
Race it, Don't rice it!
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Columbia, Mo
Age: 36
Posts: 3,996
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Poor Camaro had to go back 14 years? to find a Mustang he could beat!! Damn that is sad.


Glad your happy though.
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 04:15 AM
poncho62's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 
Last wiki edit: Streetbeasts links
Last journal entry: at car show
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Hanover, Ontario, Canada
Age: 60
Posts: 16,296
Wiki Edits: 5

Thanks: 6
Thanked 103 Times in 80 Posts
Of course, all this was at the track, wasn't it?.........
__________________
Ontario Rodders
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 05:46 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 58
Posts: 4,224
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 88
Thanked 408 Times in 374 Posts
Hey lt1silverhawk, you remember my comment HERE, post #4?
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:29 AM
Registered User
 

Last journal entry: Got it running
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 186
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 8
Thanked 4 Times in 2 Posts
6.1 liters would not be 392 cubic inches(it would be more like 6.4 or so) I don't know what the actual displacement is on the new srt motors. I did see they were calling them 392s because I was stuck at a dodge dealership for a while last week when I took mom's car in for some recall work.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:39 AM
jessicafd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 51
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
My father has the new Challenger with the 6.1 Hemi and it goes.I took it on a test drive last week with his permission.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:48 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 58
Posts: 4,224
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 88
Thanked 408 Times in 374 Posts
I believe the 6.1L (or 372.2 ci) engine is actually 370 ci and there's a 392 version labeled 6.4L.
Reply With Quote
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 06:49 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: southern Virginia
Age: 60
Posts: 86
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I really don't know how much horse power either the camaro or mustang has(because I don't own either) but most mustang guys think they can outrun anybody or anything and when they lose there's always an excuse even when they should have known better from the start.
Reply With Quote
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 08:21 AM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Mopar tapered axle rear brake conversion
Last journal entry: What I'm doing now...
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4,263
Wiki Edits: 49

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
The new 392 Hemi is slightly larger (about 6.4 ltr) than last year's 6.1 ltr. I stand corrected. Interestingly enough, Dodge refers to it as the 392 on their web site and they don't even give it a "ltr" rating. Also according to Dodge the 392 cranks out 470 horsepower and 470 lb-ft of torque. That's about 50 more horses and 90 lbs more twist than the 6.1 version. The Camaro's 6.2 Ltr on the other hand cranks out 426 horsepower and 420 lb.-ft. of torque. However the OP's Camaro is an automatic and according to Chevrolet the 6 speed automatic version of the SS 6.2 ltr. Camaro only cranks out 400 horsepower.

While we're talking about the new generation of Pony cars lets not forget the new Mustang. The Boss 302 Mustang cranks out 444 horsepower and 380 lb-ft of torque and the supercharged Shelby version is even higher. Hmmmmm...... Looks like GM's new Camaro is on the short end of the horsepower stick once again.

And.... I'm sure the OP was not stupid enough to street race. Everyone knows that Hotrodders.com does NOT condone any kind of illegal street racing.

Centerline
HotRodsAndHemis.com

Never pick a fight with an old man. If he is too old to fight, he'll just shoot you. - Anonymous

Last edited by Centerline; 04-06-2011 at 08:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 04:30 PM
jessicafd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Michigan
Posts: 51
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ford made a mistake,the new 302 is a bored over 4.6 using the 4.6 block and said this on a tv show
Reply With Quote
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 04-06-2011, 05:30 PM
Member
 
Last wiki edit: Ford axle ratio codes
Last journal entry: Rear Suspension
Last photo:
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Prattsville
Posts: 6,036
Wiki Edits: 31

Thanks: 1
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jessicafd
Ford made a mistake,the new 302 is a bored over 4.6 using the 4.6 block and said this on a tv show
It's still a modular engine, and it uses the same connecting rods as the 4.6L, but it is not a bored out 4.6. longer stroke and a bigger bore as well as, it's an all aluminum block, redesigned 4v heads with 11:1 compression. diffrent firing order and variable cam timing. it is anything but a bored out 4.6
Reply With Quote

Recent Hotrodders' Lounge posts with photos


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Strange thing happening with my clear "solvent pop"/"fish eyes" ? myfamiliacc Body - Exterior 35 02-16-2013 07:18 PM
Covering stock "plastic" door panels with "vinyl" csilva84 Interior 1 10-05-2007 06:30 PM
wiki pages: "How to rebuild an engine", "Window removal/installation" Jon Hotrodders' Lounge 0 07-11-2006 12:44 PM
Hey croz look """"IMPORTS SUCK""" 78 monte Hotrodders' Lounge 14 08-30-2002 01:13 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.