![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
With that cam, I would shoot for 10:1cr with aluminum heads
9.5:1 with iron. could go up a little more depending on the engine load (weight of car, gears, trans type, ........). |
|
|||||
|
Manual 4 speed, in a full size 70's 4x4. It's a must bog racer but used to get to work and back as well. So with aluminum heads was that 10:1 static or dynamic? I would assume static and with my setup I think that gives me around 8.7 - 8.8 dynamic. And around 180 cylinder pressure. Is that doable on 93 octane?
|
|
|||||
|
closing point also is determined where you install the intake lobe center. 60 or 61 will not make much difference.
I would stay at 10:1cr in a big heavy truck. (lots of load) what gears and tire diameter? |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
You just never know if someday you'll be stranded in Chappedass, AZ w/nothing but smuggled Pemex to put in the tank. Or the engine gets real, real hot because you don't realize the radiator fins are plugged w/mud- but you've GOT to go! All the DCR figuring, compression ratio fudging in the world will not bail you out of unforeseen situations that can occur in the real world. |
|
|||||
|
4.56 gears and 35-38 inch tires. Cobalt with all the reading I've done on here I do tend to take yours with a lot of respect. I had set my limit at 10:1 maximum for this motor but it had been lurking in the back of my mind if I could safely get away with anymore. How close to a danger point am I with 8.2:1 dcr?
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
That said, there shouldn't be a problem w/around 10:1, I wouldn't say to go over that, and possibly less depending on the entire build and use of the truck. My MAIN point was, at something like ~4-5% per point of CR, it just isn't worth pushing it for so little gain. Adding 0.5:1 CR will not change the output very much at all- but can KILL you w/detonation. BTW- that percentage (~4-5%) is open to debate and depends on whether the engine was optimized for that CR, BEFORE the added CR or not- along w/other variables. |
|
|||||
|
here is a nice article on dcr.
http://www.popularhotrodding.com/eng...tio/index.html going from 10 to 11:1 is about a 1.5% increase (as a minimum) but other factors need to be considered. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
So I humped what data you provided and assumed what you didn't which is some really important stuff like the piston you're using, head gasket and deck clearance. I used: - 64 ccs for the head volume. I think the AFR is reall 62-63. - A 4.1 inch diameter head gasket that's .051 inch compressed. - A bore of 4.03 inches and a stroke of 3.75 inches. - A flat top piston with 4.8 ccs worth of valve reliefs. - Being lazy I didn't look up a Comp 270's real intake closing point but added 18 degrees to your 40 degrees at .050 inch lift. This drives out an SCR of 10.65:1 with the DCR of 9.54:1. I'd say for a street engine, this is probably a good half ratio to high and that the total squish/quench space of .076 inch is too wide. So if my assumptions about the innards of this engine are correct, I say the squish/quench distance needs to be tightened up to .040 to .060 inch as well as configuration adjustments need to be done to get to an SCR of 10 to 10.2:1. If you can supply actual pistons used and what the deck height is, I can take another look. If you haven't built this yet, I'd say that a slice off the deck is a better choice than a thinner head gasket, although there are some solutions to using a multilayered steel gasket that can be employed. The gasket I used is a typical GM for the ZZ4 engine, it is a bit thick and is of composite metal and organic construction. A great gasket for minimizing the fretting between the iron block and aluminum head, but is a real PIA for idealizing the squish/quench gap dimension. Bogie |
|
|||||
|
No this engine isn't built yet. block hasn't been machined yet either. I haven't decided on which heads to order the AFR 1034's which list a 65cc combustion chamber or the 1036 with a 75cc chamber which is another dilema of mine. Not sure what pistons my builder will use, but i think he said something about hypereutectic. Ill list the specs of the cam as per comp cams' camquest program
X4270H Duration @.050 Intake 226 Exhaust 234 Seat to seat intake 270 Exhaust 278 Timing @.050 IVO: 6 IVC: 40 EVO: 52 EVC: 2 Seat to seat IVO: 28 IVC: 62 EVO: 74 EVC: 24 Anything more i might be able to answer for a better answer? |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Dynamic Compression Ratio?? | starnest | Engine | 3 | 04-27-2007 02:22 PM |
| dynamic compression | 71javelin | Engine | 8 | 01-04-2007 08:22 AM |
| dynamic compression | 71javelin | Engine | 13 | 10-15-2006 09:23 PM |
| Dynamic Compression | schatzy | Engine | 4 | 05-22-2006 01:11 PM |
| dynamic compression | k-star | Engine | 8 | 06-25-2004 09:33 AM |