![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Chevy Hi Performance had something on this a few years back. They were building an angine with 8.7:1 compression and Vortec heads with a 268 Comp Cam. It made good hp on the dyno but after they got it in the car it was a slug coming off the line. They diagnosed the problem as being to low on the dynamic compression. I think they said it was around 120 PSI. I believe they said not to go over 180 and 160 was about optimal. But I'm only going from memory and that was at least 4 years ago.
I've never been able to find any more on it since. It seems to me that knowing the dynamic compression is a great way to build an engine because it takes the guess work out of trying to figure the right camshaft vs Static Compresion Ratio. But most people just figure a certain amount of increase in the staice comp. ratio based on how large the cam is and what size engine it's going into. |
|
||||||
|
OK, what I was talking about was dynamic cranking pressure. I'm not sure what the dynamic compression ratio is supposed to be but I found a website with a calculator that might be able to help. However, it requires a subscription to their website.
http://www.smokemup.com/auto_math/dy...sion_ratio.php |
|
||||
|
KB Pistons has a dynamic compression calculator website that doesn't require a membership.
http://kb-silvolite.com/calc.php There is no set number for DC on pump gas. Way too many variables. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compression question for the Pro engine builders.. | Axelrod | Engine | 14 | 01-16-2007 10:29 AM |
| 351 windsor running rich ???? | ve3ham | Engine | 19 | 08-08-2005 12:48 PM |
| 11:1 CR run with 91 pump gaz???? | Ratoflic | Engine | 56 | 07-29-2005 07:53 AM |
| dynamic compression | k-star | Engine | 8 | 06-25-2004 09:33 AM |
| camshaft selection and dynamic compression | blndweasel | Engine | 7 | 03-13-2004 07:19 AM |