![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
|||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Dynomax Ultra-Flow SS?
I was looking at mufflers and came across the Dynomax Ultra-Flow SS mufflers. I keep hearing how glasspack (cherry bomb) mufflers don't flow well at all. To me these Dynomax mufflers have the same basic strait though design. Just wondering what would be different and make them flow so much better? Whats your opinion on these?
|
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: Dynomax Ultra-Flow SS?
It's the expansion chamber that influences the pressure drop. Glass packs have a tiny expansion chamber.
A 2 1/2 inch glass pack usually is less than 2" in diameter inside with louvers. Many 2+ inch inlets are only 1 1/2 inside diameter. The muffler you show is straight through the same diameter ,or even larger, with holes in it, not louvers. It also ain't very quiet either, Maynard. Last edited by xntrik : 01-07-2007 at 05:48 PM. |
![]() |
Back to top |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads for: "Dynomax Ultra-Flow SS?"
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 1968 Nova SS is about to end its Life | Seagroves | Hotrodders' Lounge | 45 | 08-11-2007 09:18 AM |
| Poor mans flow bench | hotmetal800 | Engine | 5 | 12-18-2004 01:13 PM |
| wet vs dry carb flow ratings | Litdave | Engine | 10 | 09-08-2004 06:15 AM |
| Cam Help | black66 | Engine | 3 | 05-12-2003 06:15 PM |
| Stock eliminator | 78 monte | Engine | 5 | 01-02-2003 05:10 AM |