Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - Edelbrock RPM versus Air Gap RPM
View Single Post
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 10-21-2012, 03:40 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
cobalt327 cobalt327 is offline
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,031
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 616 Times in 565 Posts
Originally Posted by Too Many Projects View Post
Is there enough difference in street performance between these 2 intakes to justify spending almost twice as much for an used air gap versus a non-air gap...
In a word- no. The non air gap is within a very small percentage of the air gap, and the major reason for the difference is not the air gap but the sliced out plenum divider that gives the air gap a slight advantage at the top of the rev band- where the engine is at a very small percentage of the time unless the vehicle is race-only.

If you plan to drive the vehicle in a cold climate, the air gap is even less of an advantage. It takes longer to warm up and the choke on the carb will be needed for a longer time. That can increase emissions, hurt mileage, and wear the cylinders and pistons/rings faster. This is slightly less of an issue if Vortec heads are being used; they do not have any heat cross over to warm the plenum anyway. But the splash from the lifter valley isn't able to help warm the intake on the air gap intake, so it's still gonna take longer to stabilize temps using the air gap on Vortec heads.

BTW, the air gap and non air gap RPM intakes are the same height.
Reply With Quote