Epicyclical gears for 4x4 transfer case - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Transmission - Rearend
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 02-05-2004, 03:24 PM
mpescatori's Avatar
New Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roma, Italy (far enough?)
Age: 54
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Question Epicyclical gears for 4x4 transfer case

OK this is possibly something nobody's ever done, or dreamed of doing, but then so was sailing west to go to China. (i.e. Columbus) I have a thing in the back of my head and need advice.
I have been offered a very junky Range Rover, nice all-aluminium 3.9 V8 but the manual 4speed is trash.
Considering a 5speed for the car can be easily found at the local junkyard (from a scrapped Rover sedan), my pipedream was to replace the manual 2speed transfer case (Hi-Lo), which DEMANDS the vehicle to be absolutely stationary to shift between Hi/Lo, with the epicyclical 'box from an automatic transmission.
In other words: in an auto'box, the epicyclical gears are always all engaged, with belts deciding which cog freewheels and which is (more or less) stationary, hence 3fwd speeds etc. The torque converter and the hydraulic labyrinth are there because there isn't a clutch, and to change gears automatically.
BUT if I already do have a clutch and a manual gearbox, can the epicyclical gears be fitted instead of the transfer case?
Why go through so much trouble? Imagine downshifting from Hi to Mid to Lo, without having to stop-shift-restart !
This would give me 5 forward speeds, applicable to three different environments: drive-heavy towing-offroad.
So, am I crazy or is it possible?

Maurizio
PS sorry for the long post, but it's been nagging me...
and if it works for me, it'll work for anybody !

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 02-06-2004, 04:14 PM
bullheimer's Avatar
NEVER use credit cards!
 

Last journal entry: car with tt2's, (stockers going back on)
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: North of Seattle
Posts: 2,532
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
i have absolutely no idea, like with most of my posts! but the only thing that crosses my mind is--aluminum v-8??? car trannies are easy to find???
time to find an old mg or something to stuff this combo into!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 02-09-2004, 03:12 AM
mpescatori's Avatar
New Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Roma, Italy (far enough?)
Age: 54
Posts: 15
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Talking

Hello Bullheimer, sorry for such a late reply.
In the 1960s Buick produced a very nive all-aluminium V8, 3.5 liters (about 220 cu.in) but it produced no more than 140 bhp, so it was sold off to Rover UK. Rover liked the idea of the all-aluminium V8 as it weighed more or less the same as their current 1800cc. 4pot, had about twice the horsepower and was a fine replacement for their aged 3.0 straight 6. Also, excellent competition of Triumph and Jaguar straight 6s.
The 3.0 V8 evolved from the initial 140bhp to 170 in EFI form, then became 4.0 and 200 bhp, but performance was limited due to narrow inlet ports.

Enter the new redesigner V8 Mk2, 3.9 L later to become 4.4 and 4.9, with redesigned heads and much more. I've been offered a fuel-injected 3.9 Range Rover, but the entire drivetrain needs attention (apparently it was used to haul the family caravan during summer vacation, 50 mhp OK but haul another 1.5 tons for life and the drivetrain's bound to wear...)

My idea is actually an offspring of my MGB's overdrive principle, a 2speed gearbox that allows for quick "half-gear" changes; why not a 3speed, so that I can drop from Hi 4th to Mid4th (rather than Hi3rd)... If you've ever tried a car with overdrive, either you're hooked or it was a bad overdrive in the 1st place, I'm hooked. That's why I was looking for a 3speed box thing.

Thanks for the support

Maurizio

PS Unfortunately GM-Ford-ect. gearboxes don't fit. Of course, Mercedes have a beautiful 5-speed auto, but that would cost me more that the car itself !

Forgot to proofread.
Confirm original V8 was 3.5, not 3.0; 3.0 was the straight 6.
All UK engines back then were cast iron so you can imagine how appealing it was to shoehorn a 3.5 V8 where you previously had a slower and heavier cast iron 4-6 pot. VERY NICE

Maurizio
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Transmission - Rearend posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.