After reviewing the movie Dolemite, and i would highly recommend watching it if you haven't, it got me wondering:
Explain the reasoning and politics behind gm's different brands and why each division, including GMC, produced it's own engines?
a) Is the profit margin really that good if an individual company designs and builds it's own engines, at high R+D costs, and sells them as opposed to using another division's engines?
b) Eventually, generally all the divisions ended using chevy's engine anyways.
c) It would seem cheaper to use an established engine, e.g. the chevy small block rather than to develop your own (i am specifically thinking of cadillac....but this applies to all gm divisions.) You'll notice today no gm car division design or builds it's own engines. That is now the task of gm powertrain.
take the ega regs out of the way and the r &d cost drop..
at one time people bought a pontiac wanted a pontiac powered car. if they wanted a chevy 350 they shopped at the chevy dealer..
badge engineering was g.m. downfall..
Most of the big auto makers produced completely different engines for each particular brand/model. That was how it was done. Status, I remember the law suits when the Olds people found Chevrolet engines.
General Motors had each division developing different items. Like several different car companies under one roof. Competing, in a way, with each other. Chevrolet was the working mans car and Pontiac was the next step up. Then Olds then Buick then Cadillac. The auto was a status symbol. Each division had to have its own engine. GMC was added so B O P dealers had a pickup to offer. For a while they were produced with Pontiac and Buick engines.
Study the marketing of automobiles back in the day..
Chrysler was pretty much the same way. Many different divisional engines that had little or no interchange.
If you go back far enough, you see that many of the brands were not GM at the beginning. Ransom E Olds made a car. Buick made cars. Cadillac made cars.
When folks bought an Oldsmobile, they knew what they were getting and the merging of the brands into "General Motors" did not change peoples loyalties to - say Oldsmobile. So when they bought an Oldsmobile, they wanted OLDSMOBILE through and through, so the engine had to be Olds
There was a hierarchy, Chevrolet as the cheapest and Cadillac as the most expensive
As was referenced earlier, in later years when GM started stuffing Chev engines into an Olds, people got upset because they did not want a cheap, lowest-of-the-line Chevrolet engine in "my Oldsmobile" (Cadillac, Buick, etc) when I am paying good money to get a REAL Oldsmobile (Buick, Cadillac, etc)
Since this was happening at the same time as GM was experiencing a general downgrading of quality throughout all lines, - well - people who could afford Cadillac abandoned ship and bought BMW and M-B rather than paying top dollar for what they saw as being nothing more than a re-badged cheap Chevy at Cadillac price.
Customers bailed by the thousands and GM was set on it course to bankruptcy.
The politics of separate engine lines was (mainly) historic and customer driven
GM assembled its product lnes by buying out other car builders so each car builder continued on designing/building their own cars with their own engines/trans and such. over time corporate combined the varius builders into what you see today..Anyone remember Fisher Body..one of the first efforts to combine design groups..
Lots of g.m. problems started very early for them.. and the other automakers as well..
When they started out.. it was a bunch of seperate companies.. under one umbrella..
everyone doing their own thing.. TO A POINT.. some steps where made to not step on each others toes..
once they started all building the same basic car with different trims..
even tho. they where styled very differently.. they where the same basic cars..
in the mid 60's (my opinion) when the cars looked to much like each other in size and outline.. is when the problems started..
the cars still was different enough in trim levels and content..but the outlines of the basic car was getting to close in sameness.. you park a 63 olds/buick/chevy/pontiac.. you can see the same car design in each..
didn't get any better in the 70's when because the hp was killed off. they started adding options to the lower models..
the you have the 80's that the cars didn't look different at all.. yes they are different but if you stand back and look at the g body family.. you can see the same car... and at this point the buyers all started wanting power everything.. you alway could get the power options in a chevy.. but the buyer didn't expect it.. the showroom stock was less likely to be a loaded car.. and if you wanted that you stopped by a buick/old/pontiac dealer..
the late 80's 90's killed off the idea of the trim scale.. chevy/olds/pontiac/buick/caddy/ they all could be found at the dealer lots. with the same equipment.. give or take one or 2..
and buyers started expecting power windows/locks/etc in the lowest of models..
bean counters figured out that if they built the same mid sized car across the board. they only haave to crash test one not all 4 (exp)cutlass/gp/monty/malbu/regal/etc,
they also found it cheaper to drop one engine in that basic car lowered the epa testing cost.. if they used one or 2 v8's and a few 6's instead of 18 different engines.. and by then brand loyalty was low. so if a pontiac g/p had a buick 3.8 no biggy.. but don't drop a chevy in it.. up till the last midsized rwd cars the buick/olds/pontiacs got olds v8 and buick 6 and chevy got chevys.. caddy got the olds 307 and that wonder of f up's the 4100
at that point g.m . SHOULD have kept the rear drive mid sized cars and moved them upscale.. letting olds/pontiac have that and the new front drive ones to chevy and buick.. I say buick beause g.m. was still pissed at buick and the g.n. making the vette look silly..
it can be said that the vette is g.m.s highwater make and it's cross to carry..
many cars that g.m. built where sidelined because of this one car.. and g.m. need to keep it king of it's hill..
g.m. sheading brands lately had to happen.. cars are not different enough to have 4 brands with the same segment car fighting each other.. that brand killing should've happened in the 70's g.m. waited to long.. they really need to stop with the 2 brands of trucks and make it one..
then move chevy into the mid sided and down and buick to mid sized and up..
and caddy as the flagship..
bring back the mid sized rwd car and hand it to buick.. YES buick.. let them make it sporty family car.. going fast with class.. and let chevy have the rwd camaro and vette.. moving the camaro back to basics.. build a kids camaro.. a fun car they can afford.. kids don't car if it's got 400 lb of sound deadner.. build a lite cheap model.. loose the center control syste that houses everything in the car.. radio/heater controls/gps/etc..
if they are going to keep the malbu and impala.. (same car) make one 2 door
g.m. over the time I've been into cars has let alot go. because of bean counters (fact of life) and the vette as the flagship mind set..
they also perfected the "we'll get it right then KILL it"
the fiero/the b bodys/the f bodys/ among the many..
imagine a g body sized car today.. rear drive with traction control for winter driving for those that can't drive(hehe) and todays powerplants..
oh course it's easy to point out g.m.s mistakes after the fact..
I'm sure it wasn't as easy in the board rooms..
someone needs to kick the beancounters in the shins and tell the designers K.I.S.S... KEEP IT SIMPLE STUPID....
g.m.s next move should be a diesel powered small car.. that run circles around europes offerings.. and if they already have it.. bring it here..
same with a mini duromax.. for the 1/2ton market.. no ones gonna cry if their 1/2 truck is getting 30-34mpg+
To give an example I remember one time buying a 48 Buick grille at a wrecking yard (yep this was only about 15 years ago, at a regular pick-ur-Part) and an old man came up to me and told me how his parents would have loved to have had a Buick but they were a Pontiac family. There was a BIG difference guys!
I am a big fan of the caddy engine. But also the buick straight 8s. I am sick and tired of the corporate motor cars and trucks. My caddy is now running at least and it is within sight that I might be able to drive it some day soon. It gives me hope that I might escape the modern corporate motor hell.
1) Were the people who cared about engine brand and/or file the lawsuit a small minority of buyers? i have never known anyone who bought corporately---i.e., buick, olds, cadillac etc. really care what brand of engine was under the hood.
a) Could this lawsuit maybe have been seen as an opportunity to make money?
b) It's funny how no-one seemed to care if the care was equipped with a TH-350---which was designed by chevy and buick, NOT hydramatic.
If it was true that people really cared what brand engine was under the hood, then what caused the change the current consensus----that is that no-cares what's under the hood; No gm division designs or produces engines---that is taken care of by gm powertrain now.
Come to think of it, no gm division designs cars anymore either; The individual brands are just marketing diversifications.
we have yet to see g.m. powertrain come out with much of anything..
the echotech is an undated olds.
the 3800 is a buick
the ls is chevy RACing..
the inline 4/5/6 is /was d.o.a.
the duramax is isuzu
After reviewing the movie Dolemite, and i would highly recommend watching it if you haven't, it got me wondering:
Explain the reasoning and politics behind gm's different brands and why each division, including GMC, produced it's own engines?
a) Is the profit margin really that good if an individual company designs and builds it's own engines, at high R+D costs, and sells them as opposed to using another division's engines?
b) Eventually, generally all the divisions ended using chevy's engine anyways.
c) It would seem cheaper to use an established engine, e.g. the chevy small block rather than to develop your own (i am specifically thinking of cadillac....but this applies to all gm divisions.) You'll notice today no gm car division design or builds it's own engines. That is now the task of gm powertrain.
Not just GM, they were just the last to go to a corporate drive train.
Nearly all the lines sold by GM and Chrysler were acquisitions of companies stated by the guy whose name plate is on the car. Louis Chevrolet, Ransom Olds, David Buick who also perfected the technique of glazing cast iron as on your bathtub, Pontiac from the Hamilton brothers, Oakland from Ed Murphy, Cadillac by Henry Leland who is also the originator of what is today's Ford owned Lincoln (Actually Cadillac actually started under Ford who was squeezed out of his original company by Leland. Then Durant squeezed Leland out of Cadillac, Leland made a new company Lincoln and was in turn squeezed out of that by Ford. The Fisher brothers, whose Fisher Coachworks who built bodies for many car makers including Buick and Leland before Will Durant bought them up and formed GM. So there was a long history of GM consisting of independent divisions that made their own engines and drivelines. The corporate takeover of designs started slowly with the frames, suspension systems, and bodies becoming common through the 1920's and 30's, then came more commonality in the rear axle and driveshaft system by 1960. Transmissions became common during the 1960's with TH350 and 400 replacing the old 4 speed Hydramatic, Power-Glide, Dyna-Flo and several other experiments. The change to corporate engines in the 1970's was a painful shock to the purchasing public but it really was the last nail in the coffin of divisional independence that had been coming for 50 years.
Chrysler and Ford have a more similar history in that they are a mixture of native developed marquees like Plymouth and Mercury, and acquisitions or absorptions like Dodge and Lincoln. The first 1950's Hemi engine is classic divisional independence except for Plymouth; Chrysler, Desoto, and Dodge had configurationally similar hemi engines that were of different dimension and design to where very few parts would fit the other's design. This changed in 1958 with the big wedge blocks as with GM by the time Chrysler imposed a corporate engine, everything else in driveline, suspension, and body had been corporatized only the badging and some interior details were different.
Ford was a similar experience although there was a flat head V8 for every division they were in detail specifically different between the Ford/Mercury and the Lincoln and big trucks. Frames, bodies and driveline had all been converging on common designs for years. This trend continued into the 1950's Y-Block V8s where the Ford/Mercury and the Lincoln/big truck Y-Blocks share nothing but the name Y-Block. They are otherwise way different engines with the Ford/Mercury having stacked intakes for example and the Lincoln head arraigned more like the Chevrolet right down to the rams horn exhaust manifold. 1958 brought out the FE and MEL V8 engines this was the last differentiation of design by division. The FE could be found in all Ford models and lower levels of the Mercury and Edsel till 1960; it shares a lot of dimensions in common with the earlier Lincoln Y-Block but parts do not interchange. The MEL block is a substantially different design but themematically similar to the FE it was found in expensive level Edsels and Mercury's the latter also available with the 430 inch version found in the Lincoln. This motor was an option on the T-Bird through 1960 as well. When the 385 block came out in 1968 even this divisional difference ended with the only variation between the big Ford/Mercury 429 block and the Lincoln 460 block was displacement.
So really the concept of corporate engines among the Big 3 was really the last straw of divisional independence. It had a much bigger impact at GM than Chrysler or Ford probably because although the latter two built independent divisional engines they were so similar looking to the eye that unless you really knew what to look for the differences weren't as obvious as with GM's engines. Plus GM had a longer history of divisional independence that starts about 20 years earlier than Chrysler or Ford.
Bogie
This is an older thread, you may not receive a response, and could be reviving an old thread. Please consider creating a new thread.
Related Threads
?
?
?
?
?
Hot Rod Forum
2.2M posts
175.7K members
Since 2001
A forum community dedicated to hot rod owners and enthusiasts. Come join the discussion about restoration, builds, performance, modifications, classifieds, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more!