![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
||||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
Ext. and int. balanced rotating assemblies
Hei!
Can I use int. balanced rotating assembly in block where used to be ext. balanced assembly. Is it possible to use stock 1-pc rear main seal on older(pre-'87?) sbc block? Is there any performance difference between int. and ext. balanced assemblies? Which should I prefer? Block is 350(383) sbc. Thank you! |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: Ext. and int. balanced rotating assemblies
The blocks don't make any difference at all. To get a two peice to work with a one piece you'll need an adaptor available form speeday motors and the like.
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
re: Ext. and int. balanced rotating assemblies
But a one piece rear crank won't fit an early two piece block. As for internal vs external balance= No real difference unless you are making over 750 horse and turning 8000 plus rpm.
|
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: Ext. and int. balanced rotating assemblies
Yes.
No. Internal. tom
__________________
Ya cain't fix stoopid, but ya kin TAX it! |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
re: Ext. and int. balanced rotating assemblies
Quote:
Yep and Yep. tom
__________________
Ya cain't fix stoopid, but ya kin TAX it! |