figuring dynamic compression acuratly - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2012, 01:24 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Camaro land
Posts: 357
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
figuring dynamic compression acuratly

my questin is this, to figure dynamic compression acuratly, would you use duration numbers @ .050 example KB calculator or use the advertise duration numbers? my thoughts are you would want to used the advertise duration numbers and not the 50 numbers because the intake valve is not completly closed at 50 which i would think would make your compression number inacurate... please correct me if im wrong on my thoughts and explain if so..

JP
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2012, 01:48 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Camaro land
Posts: 357
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
just found my answer http://cochise.uia.net/pkelley2/DynamicCR.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 08-23-2012, 07:07 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 6,430
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 3
Thanked 328 Times in 285 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67-4-fun View Post
my questin is this, to figure dynamic compression acuratly, would you use duration numbers @ .050 example KB calculator or use the advertise duration numbers? my thoughts are you would want to used the advertise duration numbers and not the 50 numbers because the intake valve is not completly closed at 50 which i would think would make your compression number inacurate... please correct me if im wrong on my thoughts and explain if so..

JP
Sometimes all you have is the .050 duration number. While not absolute for calculating DCR is better than nothing. Many calculator sites recommend adding 15 degrees to the .050 closing point; this is closer but for rampy cams usually still not there. For the new modern fast acting cams it's pretty good. When you get into muscle car era cams they are very rampy and may need 20 to 25 degrees added to the .050 closing point. One also need to consider that reversion through the valve is happening in the same flow ratios as you'd see on the bench by lift amount, so at .050 you're not getting a lot past the valve.

I think Pat Kelly is pretty close on his numbers of 7.5 to 8.5 on the street though I like to push the high side to 9 with the right combinations of parts and I try not to get under 8 for closed chamber heads but will fall to 7.5 for open chambers. One of his calculations is based off the 929 cam used by GM for the 300 horse 327, this cam is extremely rampy, I'm not convinced that it's .006 closing numbers are all that meaningful on this type cam as it stays almost but not quite closed for a lot of degrees. So while it isn't air tight, I just don't think it's losing as much ratio as the calculations would indicate. Still arithmetic models are all we have here so you've got to go with something.

This whole concept is varies greatly with chamber and piston design, bore diameter, squish/quench clearance, spark plug location, head material, intake air temp and engine operating temp, fuel mixture, ignition timing are all in play against the compression ratio.

- Smaller bores are more tolerant of high compression.

- Tighter and or larger surface area of the squish/quench is more tolerant of high compression.

- The closer the spark plug is to the bore center the more compression can be tolerated.

- Aluminum's higher rate of heat transfer than cast iron will allow it to take more compression ratio.

- Cooler temps on inlet air and engine temp will allow a higher compression ratio.

- A richer mixture is more tolerant of higher compression ratios.

- Ignition timing is a huge player; this is a place where backing down the compression ratio will cost less power loss than having to back down the optimum ignition advance to stay under the detonation limit.

For the street I like to hit about a DCR of 8 to 1 for iron and regular fuel. 8.5 with iron and premium fuel, or with aluminum and regular fuel. About 9 with aluminum and premium fuel. These being for Vortec type chambers. For open chambers these may need to be backed off half a ratio. This thought would also include using the 305 head on a 350. The 305 has the plug pretty far from the bore center which isn't much of a problem on the smaller bore 305. But on a 4 inch bore these will act a lot like the open chamber head that puts the spark plug way off the bore centerline. These type heads have a longer burn time to get across the bore and can be a detonation maker on a large bore engine if you don't compensate somewhere else.

Bogie
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
The Following User Says Thank You to oldbogie For This Useful Post:
nofearengineer (08-24-2012)
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 08-24-2012, 12:51 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Camaro land
Posts: 357
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
very good explaination oldboggie... using advertise duration vs 50 thou numbers makes the DCR lower so i was kinda puzzeld a bit.. But after thinking about a bit, i can see where a .050 number can be possibly a better number to go by example Cam A can be a 292/525 and cam B is 292/555, asuming both cams have the same LSA and ICL this is advertise duration and lift, even tho both cams have the same advertise duration, cam B with a higher lift will have a later ivc point and have more duration at .050 because of the higher lift, but if i were to use just the advertise duration numbers and not a .050 number than both cams would have the same icv point which i know is not correct..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dynamic compression? 383_Gladiator Engine 12 12-30-2010 06:03 PM
dynamic compression 71javelin Engine 8 01-04-2007 08:22 AM
dynamic compression 71javelin Engine 13 10-15-2006 09:23 PM
Dynamic Compression schatzy Engine 4 05-22-2006 01:11 PM
dynamic compression k-star Engine 8 06-25-2004 09:33 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.