![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Oldred, now you've thrown me off. I'm not sure what your talking about connecting two torque wrenches. I did find a site with this talked about. I'm talking about using an exstention on the drive not the handle. Just to make it plain I am talking about an extension not an adapter. Here's that site: http://www.specialpatrolgroup.co.uk/...ue/torque.html
|
|
|||||
|
Rat, Ok for the record I am talking about a common socket extension that extends 90 deg from the wrench handle. I did not realize what hippie had to do this test with at first so maybe he can do it but any error would have to be mechanically induced. I am talking about theory using two torque wrenches connected by an extension,(one could be thought of as the fastener) one at the connector end and the other at the socket end, now apply a given torque setting to either one and would one read less than the other? which one? why? I think the answer to this is quite obvious and for someone to argue that things like inertia from the mass of an extension affecting a properly used torque wrench is just plain ridiculous. I wonder if he even realizes that inertia would only be a factor during acceleration or deceleration and would have no effect on a steady pull or even if he really knows what inertia is.
|
|
|||||
|
Rat, I went back to the bottom that page and I think you might be talking about being sure the wrench is in line with the extension? If it were allowed to swing to an angle this would effectively shorten the extension(adapter) and give an erroneous reading.
|
|
||||||
|
One thing you have to remember is that torque wrenches are considered to be "in calibration" if they can repeat a torque setting within 10% on 3 seperate pulls. Usually they will repeat much closer than that but I honestly doubt there will be more than a 10% variation between the test with and without the extension. In other words I doubt you'll see enough difference to make any definite conclusion but if the variation falls within 10% I think we can say that effectively there is not enough difference to have a detrimental affect on the final torque at the fastener. We shall see.........
|
|
|||||
|
Hippie, The laws of physics(along with the wrench manufacturers) plainly state it can have no effect. This has been accepted since torque wrenches have been in existence and used accordingly on everything from lug nuts to the space shuttle. It is amazing how this old myth refuses to die but as I pointed out earlier it has caused many equipment and engine failures due to over-torqued fasteners and I am sure that it will continue to do this. If someone only adds a couple of pounds to a 75 ft/lb setting for instance then not much will happen but when they attempt to add 10% or so it can result in disaster.
|
|
||||||
|
Quote:
As far as the physics of it is concerned I'm not arguing with anybody, I'm just going to do a test. If there IS any torque lost through an extension I seriously doubt it would be measurable but since I have the equipment available and I'm doing the checks anyway what the heck?! You guys have been arguing this for how long now? Wouldn't it be nice to have a test done on some accurate test equipment? My gut instinct tells me "physics" will be vindicated. I've been doing this for nearly 20 years, I'm getting fairly good at it so sit back relax and wait for the results.
|
|
||||||
|
Mythbusters...here we come!
For the record I said we had a 4% variance in our little shop tests, not 10%. Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
What YOU have been saying , Thats what we have been telling YOU all along. How many times have we told you that TILTING the extension will affect the applied torque by introducing a leverage factor into the equation. There are many ways to improperly use a torque wrench or any other tool and that holding illustration is just another example of a mechanically induced error. What they are saying is DON'T DO THAT that shows how NOT to use a torque wrench!
What exactly do you think you have found here? This started when you tried to say that an extension would be in error because of twisting and you could not prove that so you have gone off in several other directions since claiming everything from inertia to a full moon would effect the reading.How much time have you spent searching the net for info to back up your point and you say you are not obsessed? If you would have the common courtesy to answer just ONE question I would like for you to explain why it is so hard to find credible info to back up what you STARTED OUT saying but the opposite info is easy to find, why is that? If you can't answer that then how about which one of those torque wrenches connected together would read less, which one? Why? Last edited by oldred; 11-16-2005 at 08:22 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Rat, He's come full circle now he is trying to say exactly what we have told him from the start. He comes up with something showing how using a wrench improperly will give an erroneous reading and then says "see here this proves what I have been saying"
|
|
||||||
|
It DOES matter where you put your hand on the Tq wrench.
I haven't changed what I've said since the beginning. Obsessed? You've had 10 posts of the last 23 and I've had 3. I'm done. -ciao |
|
|
| Recent Garage - Tools posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Need a New Torque Wrench | DTL504 | Engine | 33 | 10-25-2007 06:06 PM |
| Torque Wrench | johndoe | Garage - Tools | 4 | 10-13-2004 06:37 AM |
| flywheel torque = to flex-plate torque?? | bullheimer | Hotrodding Basics | 2 | 05-26-2004 11:24 AM |
| How do threadf lubes affect torque values? | jonathanks | Engine | 7 | 02-03-2004 10:15 AM |
| no torque wrench | jmi | Transmission - Rearend | 7 | 06-10-2002 01:17 PM |