frame boxing vs triangulating - Page 2 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Suspension - Brakes - Steering
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2007, 01:45 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: il
Posts: 150
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What did you use to box the frame? 1/8" plate steel?

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 05-03-2007, 02:07 PM
OneMoreTime's Avatar
Hotrodders.com moderator
 
Last wiki edit: Health and safety in the shop or garage
Last journal entry: Yard Dog pic
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Washington State
Age: 69
Posts: 7,222
Wiki Edits: 3

Thanks: 38
Thanked 124 Times in 120 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by chieftain
What did you use to box the frame? 1/8" plate steel?
Just a suggestion is to measure the wall thickness of your existing frame and buy your metal to box with accordingly..If yours is now say 0.95 then get the 0.95 plate to box with..Installing either a K member or X member will help you out as well. In any case I stick with the wall thickness of material to match the original when boxing and adding structure to a chassis..

Sam
__________________
I have tried most all of it and now do what is known to work..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 05-07-2007, 11:47 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Royal Oak, MI
Age: 42
Posts: 173
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 2
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
FEA actually approximates a structure by filling it with triangular elements and calculating the effect at each corner and in the middle of each straight line, TET-10 is a preferred element, so-called because it uses tetrahedrons and computes at 10 points (6 sides 4 corners).

Engineers like triangles because you can consider the sides to be in tension or compression andsuch effects tend to be an order of magnitude more significant than the bending moments seen at the corners.

Take a look at any tube frame, such as for an aircraft fuselage or a race car, and you will tend to find triangulation. Tubes can be of smaller section when they can transmit loads by tension or compression instead of bending.

None of which really speaks much to the question at hand. The thing that can't reliably or easily be simulated by FEA is the effect of welding in something to close off a C-channel section. Weld tends to be a stress riser, especially when it can't be properly normalized. Welding tends to create an area that has been heated resulting in a higher local hardness, and higher local strength, and at the edge of the heat effected zone is where you are most likely to find fracture first (on good welds).

Which means what? As far as the question at hand, probably nothing again...

In practical terms, though, there is a problem with boxing a c-channel traingularily (if that's a word)... It's an acute corner, and that isn't usually very good for getting the end of a wire to where one piece of metal touches the other. You're more likely to create a weld that is like bridging an air gap, and that means a non-optimal weld... One thing you don't want is transmitting load through weld, you want welding to be the joining of metal from one piece to the other by melting them together.

You could do this by cutting off the unused bottom flange, but now it's more work. And a sharp cormer to hit your head on.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Suspension - Brakes - Steering posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Tubbing rear with original frame rails? chieftain Suspension - Brakes - Steering 1 04-25-2007 08:02 PM
sub frame attachment Ricky Rocket Suspension - Brakes - Steering 4 09-18-2005 09:59 PM
Frame Boxing Kit(s) AD Chev PUps 47-53 lazydawg General Rodding Tech 10 08-24-2005 04:07 PM
Boxing in a frame 78 monte Suspension - Brakes - Steering 8 09-28-2003 06:20 PM
Review of FatMan IFS Airbag install 1938 Chevy PU Grashopr Suspension - Brakes - Steering 3 08-25-2003 11:16 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.