![]() |
|
|
|
|||||
|
How much clearance do you have with the tires on from the frame? Shouldn't have that small of a gap (at least 3 inches). For the brakes 1 inch is close but I don't think it would be a problem... Might have problems with the tire clearance though. I am using a 57 rear end on my 48 and it's got a little more clearance than that but not much much more just about an inch or so and I think it is around the same width as original rear. Is that rear end in the back on that pic the original one (I can't tell). If so then compair them.
|
|
||||||
|
djjc76,
I'm not trying to be overly critical, but that upper arm crossmember looks pretty slim! I'd be afraid any kind of torque to the rear axle will yank that puppy plumb out of the car. Lower arm mounts need more support, too. It might be OK for a parade car, but I wouldn't drive it on the highway like that... Russ |
|
||||||
|
Thanks for the replies...
S10,
the upper crossmember isnt done yet. I have to re-enforce it by putting "K" braces. The lower support brackets will get boxed for added re-enforcement. SMF, The rear end I used is an '80 Monte Carlo, which is 58" outer width and 51" inner width. The width of the frame from flange to flange is about 49". This only gives me 1" clearance from each side. I'm pretty much convinved this isnt the correct rear end. The axle in the background is the stock rear end, which meaures 61" outer width and 54.5" inner width. So, there is about 2 inches or so in clearance for the stock one. What I am planning to do is measure the rear end off a '70 Monte Carlo and hope that the inner width is about 53", which would give me about 2" on either side. Currently, there is no clearance from the tires to the frame, it rubs. |
|
|||||
|
Yeah seems too close man. I would give it at least 3 inches of clearance for the tire clearance and try to get another inch and a half for the clearance in the brakes there. Your cross member there in the rear of the frame looks pretty skinny.... is that original? I know mine is like a 1X1 inch square tube one. I would try to strengthen that frame up too if you add a 500. I have a 48 chevy (same thing as your basically) and everyone said if I put a built up 454 in it then I should strengthen that frame because most of the weight is being held or used by that flat plate like thing under the boxed part of the frame.
Let me know how your project goes if you don't mind, I am hoping to get some more idea's for my chassis. I have a 57 rear end under mine and it fits nicely but not sure if it will take the power of a 454 haha. Probably will look for a nice Ford 9 inch with 31 spline and an N case instead of a WAR. |
|
||||||
|
350
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Alright sweet, I see what your getting at now. Yeah well no worrying about that much clearance with that skinny of a tire now. Check out some tail dragger 47's and 48's... Here I will post a few for ya so you can get some ideas on it.
|
|
|||||
|
Here are a few others...
Oh and check out www.my48chevy.com It has TONS of pictures of 47's and 48's and there are some really nice ones on there. |
|
|
| Recent Suspension - Brakes - Steering posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 58 Chevy Apache : Brake Lights / Wiring Harness | Rathimis | Electrical | 3 | 12-13-2005 08:34 AM |
| chevy 3/4 ton rear drum to disc conversion | Rob Keller | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 33 | 12-03-2005 04:59 PM |
| Relationship between drum brakes and rear brake self-adjusters. | jpd37 | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 4 | 02-24-2004 09:13 PM |
| building a rear frame snub | TooMany2count | General Rodding Tech | 2 | 11-05-2003 10:01 AM |
| rear drum brakes | oldcarguy85 | Suspension - Brakes - Steering | 3 | 01-08-2002 09:41 PM |