![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
NONE whatsoever. The only (unproven) drawback to larger undersizes is a possible longer heat transfer time of the thicker bearing shells. Many of the high HP. engine builders are going to small sbc journal sizes (2.0") or Honda rod sizes etc. Less bearing speeds. Modern bearings can handle the extra loads.
|
|
|||||
|
crank
No difference,,,,
The only thing that might be a tick different is if the crank grinder really knew what he was doing and put a nice radius on the rod journals,, then the .020" under might be a tick stronger,,,,,, But that would be splitting hairs!!!! Keith |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| big block crank question | chevelle4542speed | Engine | 3 | 07-11-2006 05:19 AM |
| forged crank question | Ratoflic | Engine | 2 | 04-18-2006 04:50 AM |
| stock 400 crank | 6speedwagon | Engine | 4 | 10-22-2003 05:39 PM |
| 350 crank question | stfinney | Engine | 4 | 12-03-2002 02:25 PM |
| Cast Crank Question | NewmanZL1 | Engine | 2 | 06-04-2002 04:28 PM |