GM 5.3L Engines - Impala/Monte Carlo Donor - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 08:27 AM
Houston54's Avatar
Member
 

Last journal entry: 1954 Chevy Truck Project
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 272
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
GM 5.3L Engines - Impala/Monte Carlo Donor

The availability of 5.3L engines from the typical truck platforms is becoming very tight in this area but I am seeing more 5.3L from other platforms such as Impalas, Monte Carlo's, trailblazers and Envoys. These seem to have lower miles than the truck motors generally.

Are there any major differences on the 5.3L between the two platforms with the truck being RWD and the cars being FWD? I am looking for a donor for a 58 Chevy truck project.

It appears the throttle body on the car platforms is oriented such that it would face the firewall in my application. At first glance it appears the intake could be unbolted and turned 180 degrees and reinstalled to the heads. Am I mistaken in this?

Other areas where differences could impact use in my project would be trans/block bolt pattern differences, engine mount location differences, accessory mounting, and others I am sure.

I recognize the exhaust manifolds from the transverse mounted engine would not work for my truck.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 09:55 AM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Wheelbase database Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,111
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 1
Thanked 46 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Houston54
TAre there any major differences on the 5.3L between the two platforms with the truck being RWD and the cars being FWD?
Yes. The FWD 5.3 uses the GM metric bellhousing bolt pattern, which is the same as on the 60 degree V6 motors and the Buick 3800 Series II/III motors. You can use a 700R4 from an S-10 with the 2.8 V6 or the trans from a fourth Gen F-body with the 3800 Series II.
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 10:55 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 58
Posts: 4,286
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 89
Thanked 423 Times in 388 Posts
The truck engines seem more used friendly, IMO. I believe some of those other engines have VVT and some also are displacement on demand.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 11:48 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Central fl.
Age: 35
Posts: 49
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
The fwd motor has a unique water pump and drive. Also they are displacement on demand and have special lifters and camshaft. It can proably be changed but I don't know. Also I know the starter is mounted to the bellhousing on the fwd cars and I don't know if a standard starter will bolt on.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 12:07 PM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: Wheelbase database Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Virginia
Posts: 3,111
Wiki Edits: 1

Thanks: 1
Thanked 46 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Phoneguy
The fwd motor has a unique water pump and drive. Also they are displacement on demand and have special lifters and camshaft. It can proably be changed but I don't know. Also I know the starter is mounted to the bellhousing on the fwd cars and I don't know if a standard starter will bolt on.
And the crank is shorter at both ends as compared to a RWD version.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 02:28 PM
LATECH's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 

Last journal entry: Motor - vator
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Northeast Pennsylvania
Posts: 4,398
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 85
Thanked 123 Times in 116 Posts
I would also think the oil sump and pan /windage tray is also configured different between the two JMO
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-14-2011, 04:05 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: usa
Posts: 29
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would skip it for all the above reasons. Have you been to LS tech com I have just started researching a swap and found it very informative.
Reply With Quote

Recent Engine posts with photos


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
monte carlo ss momteman50 Introduce Yourself 2 09-28-2009 04:24 PM
monte carlo ss MDot Transmission - Rearend 7 09-28-2009 04:19 PM
86 Monte Carlo erimar77 Hotrodding Basics 7 02-01-2005 09:57 PM
Does anybody own 84-88 monte carlo? 87442lover Engine 5 01-27-2004 10:18 PM
Monte Carlo bigjoedo Body - Exterior 1 02-07-2002 03:04 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:08 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.