![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Help With A Cam
I'm looking into getting a new cam for my new Chevy 350. Right now I've decided on a Competition Cams product.
My last 350 had 12:1 compression and was using a Reed mechanical cam with 264-268 duration and with a .555 lift, it ran 11.8 in the quarter My new engine will have 10.5 compression with aluminum heads and the cam I'm looking at has these specs: CCA-CL12-225-4 Brand: Competition Cams Product Line: Competition Cams Magnum Solid Cam and Lifter Kits Cam Style: Mechanical flat tappet Basic Operating RPM Range: 3,000-7,000 RPM Intake Duration 050 inch Lift: 260 Exhaust Duration 050 inch Lift: 260 Duration at 050 inch Lift: 260 int./260 exh. Advertised Intake Duration: 306 Advertised Exhaust Duration: 306 Advertised Duration: 306 int./306 exh. Intake Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.555 Exhaust Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.555 Valve Lift with Factory Rocker Arm Ratio: 0.555 int./0.555 exh. lift Lobe Separation (degrees): 110 Intake Valve Lash (in): 0.022 Exhaust Valve Lash (in): 0.022 Grind Number: CS 306S-10 Computer Controlled: No Lifters Included: Yes Lifter Style: Mechanical flat tappet Valve Springs Included: No Retainers Included: No Locks Included: No Valve Stem Seals Included: No Timing Chain and Gears Included: No Assembly Lubricant Included: Yes Pushrods Included: No Rocker Arms Included: No Gaskets Included: No Quantity: Sold as a kit. What do the techs here have to say about it? |
|
||||
|
Too much duration
|
|
||||||
|
What would you all recommend?
What would happen if I used this cam? |
|
|||||
|
cam
duration should be in the 235/245 @.050 for this engine if it is a tru 10.5:1... If it going in a heavy car 3200lbs plus i would stay on the lower end, if it's in a lighter car with good exhaust, converter, intake go to the larger number...
Keith |
|
||||
|
Charlie, I'm not a professional engine guy, but this just seems extreme. Do you ever plan to drive this beast on the street?? If so, I'd back down.
Also, with this much duration, and aluminum heads, I'd imagine that on 92 Octane you could pump up the compression a bit higher . . . . but that wasn't the question and I'm not paying the bills for detonation if I'm wrong. If you're ever gonna drive this thing on the street, I'd agree with one of the prior posts, something under 245 @ 50 makes a lot more sense. I notice this is a single pattern cam . . . . .Are you using AFR heads?? Pat |
|
||||||
|
Assuming you're using the same intake manifold, open headers etc
and are going drag racing with it, something like this should work well. Comp cams #12-502-5 Look up the specs online at comp cams. This is a tight lash cam with intense lobes. the short 280-284 running duration will match your 10.5:1 compression ratio better. This cam should be degreed in and advanced in the motor about 4-6deg from straight up. Intake lobe C/L @ 100-102. It's ground on 106LSA. If you just got to have a huge cam try Isky cams #201549 Look it up online. it is also a intense tight lash cam. This cam also should be degreed in and advanced to 99*-102* intake lobe C/L Both these cams work well on 10.5:1 motors. They are plenty big to make good power. If you drive on the street I'd use the Smaller comp cam thou. How will you be using this motor? what other parts are you using on it? rear gearing? torque converter stall rpm? Both these cams are stocked by Summit Racing. Last edited by F-BIRD'88; 10-08-2005 at 10:19 PM. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
A cam ground on 114Lobe centers has less overlap than a cam with the same duration but ground on tighter lobe centers like 108 or 106. Wether the brakes will be affected depends on the duration and then to a lesser extent the lobe separation angle. Both the above cams will work ok with power brakes on most cars. Both these cams require significant increased initial timing at idle and idle rough at 800rpm. The larger one will want the mechanical ignition timing curve in the distributor locked out with full advance at idle for best results. If you still have trouble with the power brakes you can add a vacuum resiovor canister, (comp cams) inline between the power brakes and vacuum source. You can also add a electric auxillary vacuum pump. 1980's era GM mid sized front wheel drive cars and some Caddilac's have them. I have used cams this big on cars with power brakes before. they worked ok. Once the motor is set up right. |
|
|
| Recent Engine posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pontiac cam? | Wmarden | Engine | 12 | 08-22-2010 08:09 AM |
| More issues....lets talk cam failure | TurboS10 | Engine | 23 | 09-28-2004 11:51 AM |
| cam base circle vs. lobe lift question | S10xGN | Engine | 4 | 09-19-2004 10:31 AM |
| Installed New Cam, CAR WONT Start/no Compression? | sum87mustang | Engine | 4 | 10-27-2003 07:52 AM |
| 289 cam change | franklin289 | Engine | 0 | 04-22-2003 02:38 PM |