Hot Rod Ethics - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 03:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Pullman
Posts: 6
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Hot Rod Ethics

Is the kind of mod described at www.somender-singh.com within the ethics of the hot rodder community?

It involves cutting a groove in the cylinder head to promote turbulence, thereby breaking the integrity of the 'origibal' engine.

This is a dilemma because I am considering offering this mod to people in the area and if people will disagree with the practice, then it isn't really worth it.

A few people have found consistent results from their grooves which seems to be highly credible and make the idea attractive:

lower idle speed, increased torque and power and some claim 20-30% fuel efficiency gains, even on the 1/4 mi. track.

So, I'm appealing to the "biggest" hot rod community out there..
is this stuff bunkus? If not, do y'all think it would catch on?

I'd like to do something with it because it seems like a really good idea.

EM

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 03:59 PM
King of my Man-cave.
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 58
Posts: 2,912
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
I'd really like to see some REAL non-biased testing. He seems to be making a BIG DEAL about saving precious fuel, apparently to save BIG BUCKS. I'm not terribly impressed with ads that show "Improved heads" followed by pictures of "fast" cars. There is no proof that the cars are the same and that the results come from the head modifications. Plus, it looks to me that the "modification" is likely to develop into a crack.

tom
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 04:07 PM
NAIRB's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: cimarron, ks
Posts: 1,658
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
That appears to be alot of quackery.

Just get out the Makita grinder, and whammo!! , instant fuel economy and power.

That's riciculous IMOP.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
 
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 04:18 PM
King of my Man-cave.
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Michigan
Age: 58
Posts: 2,912
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 6
Thanked 18 Times in 15 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NAIRB
That appears to be alot of quackery.

Just get out the Makita grinder, and whammo!! , instant fuel economy and power.

That's riciculous IMOP.
(I said so much in my secret code!)




tom
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 04:21 PM
Henry Highrise's Avatar
Lost in the 60's
 
Last wiki edit: Removing stuck fasteners Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dixieland
Age: 72
Posts: 15,195
Wiki Edits: 4

Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
If it sounds too good to be true......it usually is!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 09:02 PM
xntrik's Avatar
Save a horse, Ride a Cowboy.
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,131
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Very Very interesting...... deja vu..

There was a fellow doing this in 1961. He used to claim it squirted the mixture across the chamber...
His name was Don Metzger from Lockport, Illinois.
Some of his 2 stroke heads, like those in pictured, had 3 radial grooves.

Some people swore by it back then.....

No, I never ran grooved heads on my engines.....

I used to have one of his heads in my collection, I know in '88..... now I have to go dig through all that stuff to see if I still have it.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-09-2006, 10:13 PM
DHMag's Avatar
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: InCahoots, Texas
Posts: 302
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
id try it on a lawnmower engine before compromising my investment in my motor.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 05:03 AM
Bumpstick's Avatar
Hammer and a torch
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Southeast TX
Age: 56
Posts: 1,258
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Looks more like it promotes crack (literaly)...?


I`m carving right now on my 990 BBC heads (porting and polishing) but no way am I going to do that kind of demolishion to these babies...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 06:17 AM
farna's Avatar
Member
 
Last wiki edit: AMC V-8s Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Batesburg-Leesville, SC
Age: 55
Posts: 1,716
Wiki Edits: 14

Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
Groover, why not go ahead and try it, then publish your findings here? First though, you need to have a good running engine and get some base line figures. Then modify the heads and stick them back on the same engine, same vehicle, and test again for a couple weeks at least. That's the only way you're going to find out for sure if what you're doing helps.

The theory is sound -- more turbulence promotes more efficient burning. So what don't OEMs jump on it? Increased cost for one thing. You can't cast something like that into the head AFAIK. Extra machine work is required, which increases cost significantly. There's also the fact that they would have to pay for use of the patent, and many engineers suffer from "not invented here" syndrome. This does come from someone who isn't a licensed engineer also, therefore it can't possibly be any good... in many engineer's way of thinking.

If it becomes common practice, OEMs may eventually develop something similar. I think Honda developed a three valve engine that worked somewhat on the same principal -- the third valve was canted to produce more turbulence. May not have been Honda, but I do recall reading something about that somewhere. There are other ways to design a combustion chamber for increased turbulence, and that's more likely the way OEMs will go. The grooves may turn out to be a great modification of existing engines though. If you have an extra set of heads and can affrod the testing, please do!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 06:37 AM
Garbonzo Bojangles's Avatar
Youre confusion is not logical
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sabres country, NY
Posts: 118
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
This guy is a relatively poor inventor from India and has been trying to get his idea recognized and studied more thoroughly by the big car manufacturers in the US for many years. He was always shot down. There was a big article written about him a few years ago. Interesting read, you may want to search for it. Finally, a manufacturer in India funded him a bit and it looks like he has finally gotten the word out.

For you nonbelievers, you should have looked at the "Testing Results" section. One example is here. But this guy does not have the money or the resources to perform massive testing.

Like farna said to you shop owners, if you ever have a spare set of heads lying around, I'm sure we would all like to see dyno info from before and after this mod. There is obviously something to this idea. If it is inded true I'd think about doing this to my truck (10 mpg...).
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 06:39 AM
ckucia's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cleveland
Age: 49
Posts: 565
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here's an excerpt from the site referenced:

"Many people want to know how they can cut their own groove. Here are a few steps to the process.

1. Chose a engine design that has some form of squish or quench. Consider both the piston top and combustion chamber when deciding.
(e.g. dish pistons reduce the squish percentage considerably.)

2. Run a base line test with regular pump gas and production compression ratio, normally near 8.5 to 9:1?

3. Remove the heads and raise the compression ratio up to 10:1, milling the heads is the preferred method.

4. Cut one groove in each combustion chamber like the one in the pictures. So far the straight channel seems to work the best.
(if using a SBC, the grooves will measure near 1 cc volume)

5. Ensure a 0.070" piston to head clearance is maintained, measured at engine assembly. Most hot rodders are tempted to raise the compression by reducing the piston to head clearance down to 0.040" or less, resist the temptation.

Note. Testing continues with various different combinations. With high octane fuel we have seen complete burn at 7500 RPM with the squish clearance set at 0.039" at engine assembly.

6. Bolt the heads back on, leave the tune up alone, measure and report the improvements. Check and correct the tune up as needed and put it in a car (dyno's aren't much fun). You won't be dissatisfied"


I don't have time right now to look at the whole site, but I'd like to see a comparison where the heads are milled first, raising the compression ratio, and getting some dyno numbers. Then, cut the groove, and re-dyno it.

Otherwise, I don't see how you can make a valid comparison.

Another quote from the site sure makes me wonder:

"So why hasn't this become mainstream? We are confused about this also. Dyno testing has been requested by some, but as yet no one has come forward to pay for this testing. Until then, we must continue to perform real world testing.

Dyno's will not show you much about day to day engine performance. A full-out dyno run will tell you many things in great detail, but the relevance to stop and go, up and downhill performance over the long term is negligible.

Trust the people's results"

Uh-huh. Color me a skeptic until someone can show some hard numbers due only to the groove. If you have "relevant" performance increases, they ought to show up on the dyno graph somewhere.

I'd go a little bit farther with the comparison too - since the groove is going to increase the size of the combustion chamber slightly, I think it would be a good idea to slightly mill the heads to keep the combustion chamber size the same. Best would be to do three comparisons:

Heads stock
Heads with groove
Heads with groove and milled so the combustion chamber size is back to the stock test.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 07:43 AM
350c10's Avatar
Nothing beats cubic inches
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oklahoma
Age: 27
Posts: 24
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Dude if it helps go for it. What are squish and quench?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 09:09 AM
farna's Avatar
Member
 
Last wiki edit: AMC V-8s Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Batesburg-Leesville, SC
Age: 55
Posts: 1,716
Wiki Edits: 14

Thanks: 0
Thanked 26 Times in 24 Posts
There are articles on the net covering quench (squish is really just another way of saying it). Mr. Singh recommends shaving the head and states that compression would be increased, but that's under normal circumstances. After shaving the head "to increase compression" you make grooves that increase combustion chambe size and DECREASES compression -- returns it back to the original compression.

At least that's how I'm reading it. The explanation isn't worded real clear, but then I'm used to reading/speaking to people whose native language isn't English. The thought process, or at least the way it comes out, is slightly different. You have to "read into it" a bit.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 09:48 AM
Infomaniac's Avatar
Twin Turbo Drag Boat
 

Last journal entry: Random In Progress Shots
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Locust Grove, OK
Age: 54
Posts: 372
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I will agree that increased turbulence is going to help combustion and power.

But if his grooves actually do this ???????

Last edited by Infomaniac; 01-10-2006 at 11:06 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-10-2006, 10:24 AM
xntrik's Avatar
Save a horse, Ride a Cowboy.
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 5,131
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 350c10
Dude if it helps go for it. What are squish and quench?

Think of quench this way:

Did you ever see a kid lay a ketchup package on the table and then slam it with is fist????? That's quench/ squish. (and squirt..... LOL)

That is what happens when the flat part of the piston gets close to the flat part of the head.

Supposedly his groove squirts the mixture out in a stream creating turbulence and better burn.


http://kb-silvolite.com/article.php?action=read&A_id=35

http://www.chevyhiperformance.com/techarticles/94138/

http://www.beckracing.com/page05.htm
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:
Insurance
Please select your insurance company (Optional)

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Hot rod builders wanted- Western N.C. WoodsEdge Hotrodders' Lounge 16 11-13-2013 01:47 PM
HOT ROD vs Car Craft magazine FASTCHEVY Hotrodders' Lounge 35 03-25-2008 04:11 PM
Hot Rod TV......... onebadmerc Hotrodders' Lounge 44 06-17-2006 02:57 AM
my first hot rod loco Hotrodding Basics 4 06-12-2006 04:52 AM
Google hot rod news search Jon Hotrodders' Lounge 14 02-09-2004 04:43 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
vBulletin Security provided by vBSecurity v2.2.2 (Pro) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2017 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.