How bad is the Weiand X-Celerator intake? - Page 2 - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #16 (permalink)  
Old 02-28-2009, 08:57 PM
Hippie's Avatar
Analog man in a digital world.
 

Last journal entry: HEI comparison.
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,253
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 3
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Keep it. Ran one eons ago on my 383 SBC in a '72 Chevelle with a TH400 and 3.73 gears. I was running an old Erson TQ30 cam 228* @ .050" with 111 LSA, the current TQ30 is 114 LSA. Anyway, it worked great. Had "just" enough vacuum for my power brakes, great throttle response right off idle and pulled HARD to 6 grand. That was without a divider plate, they hadn't added that back then.

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #17 (permalink)  
Old 03-01-2009, 12:40 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kentucky
Age: 42
Posts: 212
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks for the replies and for explaining how the divider plate works. It seems this intake has more fans than what I thought. I was talking to the wrong people and getting a bad opinion. I will definetly stick with mine.
Thanks again guys!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #18 (permalink)  
Old 03-03-2009, 06:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: orlando
Posts: 204
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
alot of people put this intake on 8.5 to 1 350s in the eighties, with stock converters, and gears...because those intakes were only 79.95! hence, the bashing...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #19 (permalink)  
Old 03-04-2009, 03:59 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kentucky
Age: 42
Posts: 212
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I made that mistake before with mismatched parts. Its easy to do.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #20 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2009, 02:50 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: in the garage
Posts: 240
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
They are good manifolds and also an IMCA SPEC MANIFOLD
* Single Plane
* Square Carburetor Mounting Flange
* IMCA Approved
* Power band: 2500-7000 RPM
* Height: Front 3.09", Rear 4.06"
* Port Size: 1.85 height 1.15" width
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #21 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2009, 03:51 PM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 60
Posts: 5,037
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 598 Times in 547 Posts
The best thing about it or the Torquer/T-II intakes is the price and they will clear low hoodlines.

They do not make as much power under the curve than an RPM (forget the Airgap) and I doubt the peak power is any better either.

These single plane low-riser's are not in the same league as an RPM, IMO.

Last edited by cobalt327; 07-12-2009 at 11:13 PM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #22 (permalink)  
Old 07-12-2009, 10:23 PM
Registered User
 
Last wiki edit: How to title a hot rod Last photo:
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: West Virginia
Age: 25
Posts: 3,393
Wiki Edits: 8

Thanks: 16
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by GenYnNC
Don't listen to those dual plane wimps! Seriously you've got 400+ cubes, the x-celerator is perfectly fine in your application. (Just kidding about the dual plane supporters, I just like 'ruffle their feathers every now and then)
The truck is 4500+lbs,and has 3.08 gears , I went with a performer vortec for my 406. Can't wait till I get it together and in there.
Shane
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #23 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 12:17 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Kentucky
Age: 42
Posts: 212
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 8
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
This is the one I'm using, it has the divider plate.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	wnd-7546.jpg
Views:	793
Size:	16.3 KB
ID:	39457  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #24 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 01:22 AM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 40
Posts: 10,657
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 15
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
If they would make the above intake for Vortec heads it would be ideal on the street with the divider plate and a Quadrajet mounting flange. IMO.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #25 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 07:54 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: montreal quebec canada
Posts: 160
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
What would be the outcome i.e. (inches of vaccum) if I ran a 4 hole spacer plate with my current setup.. Would the vaccum come up a bit ??? I have the 7547 X-cellerator w/o the divider plate and a low lift, .394 and .398 - high 244 @050 NHRA "stocker cam" alongwith 8:5 cr and suffering from low vaccum blues. Crazy lope at idle... and am determined to bring up the vaccum w/o a cam change or intake change.. Timing is now 18 BTDC and will go another 2 to 4 degrees 'cause of the inefficient chambers.
Intake is great though, me heads stop flowing at 4000 which means less tickets and invites to the policemen's ball.
T.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #26 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 08:19 AM
How fast is fast enough?
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 29
Posts: 9,484
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked 388 Times in 364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by opelitis5
What would be the outcome i.e. (inches of vaccum) if I ran a 4 hole spacer plate with my current setup.. Would the vaccum come up a bit ??? I have the 7547 X-cellerator w/o the divider plate and a low lift, .394 and .398 - high 244 @050 NHRA "stocker cam" alongwith 8:5 cr and suffering from low vaccum blues. Crazy lope at idle... and am determined to bring up the vaccum w/o a cam change or intake change.. Timing is now 18 BTDC and will go another 2 to 4 degrees 'cause of the inefficient chambers.
Intake is great though, me heads stop flowing at 4000 which means less tickets and invites to the policemen's ball.
T.

The vacuum will come up if you get a much better set of heads with smaller chambers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #27 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 09:12 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: montreal quebec canada
Posts: 160
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I agree!! This point in time all I have are stock heads 462624 and 14016615
at my disposal.. I have a set of Rhoads lifters sitting and I might put 'em in..
The 882 heads on the engine are dated late '73 and have not a lot of work done to them as can be seen by the rpm level that the engine drops off the wall, so I am trying a couple of things B 4 I will change out the heads.. Not a load of $$$ at this point in time sorry to say, eh... Still like the intake though, nice n' low for a 2nd Gen 81 355ci 4spd Cdn. Camaro..
T.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #28 (permalink)  
Old 07-15-2009, 09:18 AM
How fast is fast enough?
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: St. Louis, MO
Age: 29
Posts: 9,484
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 20
Thanked 388 Times in 364 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by opelitis5
I agree!! This point in time all I have are stock heads 462624 and 14016615
at my disposal.. I have a set of Rhoads lifters sitting and I might put 'em in..
The 882 heads on the engine are dated late '73 and have not a lot of work done to them as can be seen by the rpm level that the engine drops off the wall, so I am trying a couple of things B 4 I will change out the heads.. Not a load of $$$ at this point in time sorry to say, eh... Still like the intake though, nice n' low for a 2nd Gen 81 355ci 4spd Cdn. Camaro..
T.

RHS makes some 170cc heads that are relatively cheap and preform very well considering their low cost- may be something to consider. There's also the option of porting out some camel humps- you can get those for $100 a set bare now, it'd be about $450 to finish them up.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #29 (permalink)  
Old 07-16-2009, 05:48 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2008
Location: ohio
Posts: 1,613
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 54
Thanked 67 Times in 64 Posts
I ran one of those Xcelerator intakes on a 355 sbc with world sportsman 2's along with a comp 292h cam with a holley 650 and a 3000 rpm stall with a turbo 350 and 3.73 gears and it ran awesome. I went to another weiand stealth intake cause I needed more bottom end and more for street then top end. Weiand intakes are just about as good as Edelbrock.
Eric
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #30 (permalink)  
Old 07-17-2009, 09:06 AM
DoubleVision's Avatar
Not Considered a Senior Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Heart Of Dixie
Age: 40
Posts: 10,657
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 15
Thanked 60 Times in 57 Posts
David Vizard had some interesting things to say about this intake.
"Although it borders on a "X" design, the Weiand 7504 manifold can be made to work quite well. However, it must be used with a divider as shown here or the results achieved will be disappointing. Without the divider I`ve seen as much as 60 foot pounds of torque and almost a like amount of horsepower disappear"
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Engine posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
bad fuel or bad mechanical fuel pump?????? Danscam Engine 4 09-06-2006 10:03 PM
bad running engine roycecas1 Engine 7 08-18-2006 07:37 AM
I need my bad luck to go away..... onebadmerc Hotrodders' Lounge 5 01-23-2004 10:08 PM
is this repetitive bad luck or what? 71gtx Engine 4 11-18-2003 09:19 PM
how bad is it to ride on bad akm Suspension - Brakes - Steering 5 05-13-2003 10:28 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.