![]() |
Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Home · Bulletin Board · Project Journals · Tech Article Wiki · Knowledge Base · Photo Gallery · Classifieds · Company Reviews · Calendar · T-Shirts |
|
||||||
|
|||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
#1
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
How Low Can You Go? compression question
i have a pontiac 400 motor that i'm trying to get running again. had a cracked exhaust manifold, led to broken exhaust bolts, needs an EDM machine & hundreds of $$. alternatively, i can put on a set of heads that i have that came off of another motor (455). the 455 heads have huge chambers and would reduce compression to about 7:1, maybe even just under 7. how bad would this be? would i need a hotter plug? change timing (which way?).
thanks. *** edited to add: i ASSume less advance, but figgured i'd ask *** Last edited by TheMonkey : 11-27-2006 at 03:07 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
This is something I have also wondered. I am pretty sure some of the first cars had around 5:1 compression. I realize that from a performance and efficiency standpoint, this would not be the greatest, but are there any other draw backs? It would be good to know for an N/A motor, but I have also wondered for a forced induction motor. The less compression you run, the more boost you can run and stay on pump gas. What is the practical lower limit? What if you ran 6:1 compression and 40 psi boost?
If you look at this chart (page 24), you can see the pattern http://www.procharger.com/pdf/Chevy.Prod.bb.pdf Adam |
|
#3
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
from 1975ish to 1978ish, the big pontiacs ran stock at 7.6:1, so i'm not that far away, but man that seems low.
|
|
#4
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
my 1951 235 Chevy I6 has 6.7:1 compression and it has no trouble starting or running, and it runs on 6v. considering that, I'd say your fine with 7:1, just don't expect much performance. some people do build blower motors to 6:1 so they can boost up to 18 PSI or more, on pump gas.
|
|
#5
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
NA with ultra low compression it's best to reduce camshaft overlap to trap more of the charge to increase cylinder pressure, the results is a very low RPM engine.
As for ignition timing normally larger chambers need more advance. You will need a hot plug with this combination. |
|
#6
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Those older engines were also optimized for that lower compression... timing curves, fuel curves, everything. A more modern engine will need some customization to run right at that low compression... possibly a custom cam in the 190-195* intake duration, a self-made ignition curve (or one that's locked in at full advance). You could run normal stock parts on it, but once you drop below 7:1 its a whole new ballgame.
Expect sub-150 hp numbers |
|
#7
|
||||||
|
||||||
|
Here's one I simulated with a 191/196 cam and 6.9:1 compression. HP peaks at 3000 rpms
|
|
#8
|
|||||
|
|||||
|
thanks for the simulation Curtis.
i'm gonna fish around for a set of used heads that would work better. i know there are piles of 70s era stuff that are in the boat anchor pile. the trick is just to find the pile, then find something useable. even with a 2bbl top end on this thing it had some bark. it just wouldn't be fair to entirely neuter it with compression nums like that. unless i put a $turbo$ on. |
![]() |
Back to top |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
Similar Threads for: "How Low Can You Go? compression question"
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Compression question | babygene41042 | Engine | 0 | 05-01-2006 07:17 PM |
| Interesting compression question | Jmark | Engine | 11 | 04-26-2006 03:27 AM |
| Compression question. | Super Chevy | Engine | 8 | 03-29-2006 12:24 PM |
| Compression Question | StevenC | Engine | 14 | 02-08-2006 02:05 AM |
| compression question, | 82c10 | Engine | 1 | 12-14-2005 05:00 PM |