how much hp does a stock 454 oval port push? - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Hotrodding Basics
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 07:12 PM
85 k5 mud truck's Avatar
****** bowtie
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2009
Location: south carolina
Posts: 52
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
how much hp does a stock 454 oval port push?

i was just wondering how much hp my motor stock should push. 454 oval port

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 07:24 PM
Member
 

Last journal entry: frame build
Last photo:
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: sioux falls, sd
Age: 68
Posts: 601
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
bout 260 hp
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 06-11-2009, 11:18 PM
curtis73's Avatar
Hates: Liver. Loves: Diesel
 
Last wiki edit: How to find cheap parts
Last journal entry: 1999-2001: Getting it on the road
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Age: 40
Posts: 5,128
Wiki Edits: 16

Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 85 k5 mud truck
i was just wondering how much hp my motor stock should push. 454 oval port

Uhh... depends on a ton of factors. There were oval port BBCs that made as little as 190 hp and some that made 350+. If its the stock 85 big block, it was most likely a 215 hp version, 7.8:1 compression.

Care to share a few details?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 06-12-2009, 07:25 AM
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Age: 50
Posts: 4,021
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 23 Times in 23 Posts
Yes, fairly low hp due to a very small cam, restrictive intake, and restrictive exhaust. But the torque is pretty good at extremely low rpms which makes it seem more powerful than it is.

Nothing a mild cam, intake, carb, and a set of header won't fix. On an otherwise stock low compression 454 engine, 325hp+ and 450 ftlbs+ can be obtained with a few bolts-ons.

I have seen dyno results showing 345hp and 490 ftlbs from a 7.5:1 cr 454 with a tiny 202/210 flat hydro cam, headers, rpm intake, and 750 holley.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009, 04:33 AM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Springfield, MO
Age: 29
Posts: 1,100
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Depends on the year. My 1978 454 (has 781 heads on it) was rated 240hp and 370 ft lb.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 07-02-2009, 06:29 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 59
Posts: 5,037
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 597 Times in 546 Posts
What are the casting numbers of the heads? If they're the small oval port heads (aka "peanut port"), they suck for anything much over 4000 RPM unless ported and valved. Not even worth the work, IMO. AFAIK, no intakes were made just for them either, except OEM Q-Jet cast iron.

Supposedly Weiand makes one "peanut port" manifold, the #8017 Action Plus. Has a spread bore flange. Whether or not it's actually a PP intake or one like the Eddy Performer 2-O, I'm not sure.

Last edited by cobalt327; 07-02-2009 at 06:49 AM.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2013, 09:15 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Help Needed 85 454

I have an 85 454 out of a suburban I plan to use in my Studebaker project.
It has cast iron rectangular port heads and the rest is stock.
What will give me the most bang for the buck as far as bumping up the H.P.
???

Thanks ,

Dean.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-02-2013, 09:35 PM
Bye Jerks
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: nowhere
Posts: 101
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 6 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Pearson View Post
I have an 85 454 out of a suburban I plan to use in my Studebaker project.
It has cast iron rectangular port heads and the rest is stock.
What will give me the most bang for the buck as far as bumping up the H.P. ??? Thanks , Dean.
Run pistons that will give you 9.5:1 compression ratio. ( reference your chamber volume and deck height )
Get a mid-range torque cam. Flat-tappet hydraulic that makes power from 1500-5500. ( matching lifters too! )
Edelbrock Performer RPM intake with a 750-800cfm carb.
Headers. ( Even shorty's with dual exhaust will help. ) Run 2 1/2" exhaust pipe and some good mufflers.
MSD 6AL ignition would be very nice, but at least run an HEI.

Automatic tranny? Run a mild stall converter. Like a 2,000-2,500 rpm.

Do those things, and you will like it.
Shouldn't cost too much money. Good bang for the buck.

One more trick: calculate your rear-end gear ratio based on your tranny final drive ratio, your rear tire diameter, and your max engine RPM's. Choose the optimal ring & pinion set. Rear-end gears can make a huge difference in how the vehicle accelerates.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-03-2013, 01:23 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 59
Posts: 5,037
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 597 Times in 546 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dean Pearson View Post
I have an 85 454 out of a suburban I plan to use in my Studebaker project.
It has cast iron rectangular port heads and the rest is stock.
What will give me the most bang for the buck as far as bumping up the H.P.
???

Thanks ,

Dean.
What's the casting number of the heads? There are small and open chamber rectangle port heads, this will have a big effect on the compression ratio (CR). Also, what size is the piston dome, or a part number? Or are they flat tops? Do you have the heads off? If you do, measure how far down the deck of the piston is at TDC.

Reason is, you need to know what the CR is before you can choose a cam that will work the best for you. If you have FT pistons about the most CR you're going to see is 9:1, that's with 100 cc chambers. 8.5:1 w/108 cc, and 8:1 w/118 cc. You can get away w/less CR than a SBC, but you can't go too radical w/the cam timing before you start to lose bottom end and the off idle and low end response gets soggy.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-04-2013, 07:04 PM
Registered User
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 19
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Thanks.

Wanted to thank you guys for the info.
In my case I have the original engine that I want to bump up a bit but then I also have a fully machined matching block that is bored .030 on the pistons and .010 on the cam bearings so,....
I plan to just get my car running with the original engine and then once I'm driving it build the second one.
On the first one I fear its going to be a slug. The engine casting #'s are
14015885 (I think) They are hard to read. and the heads say Hi Perf.
6272990.
Hope that helps you help me.

Also here are some more pics. of my Studebaker Proj, It's a 52 two door hard top with a 50 bullet nose.

Thanks for all the advice.

Dean.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2012-12-31_16-32-06_964.jpg
Views:	97
Size:	1.65 MB
ID:	70294   Click image for larger version

Name:	2012-12-31_14-59-26_14 (1).jpg
Views:	80
Size:	1.72 MB
ID:	70295   Click image for larger version

Name:	2012-12-31_14-52-58_921.jpg
Views:	73
Size:	1.62 MB
ID:	70296  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-05-2013, 02:39 AM
cobalt327's Avatar
WFO
 
Last wiki edit: Intake manifold
Last journal entry: 1980 Malibu Wagon
Last photo:
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Atlanta
Age: 59
Posts: 5,037
Wiki Edits: 1616

Thanks: 128
Thanked 597 Times in 546 Posts
ID Chevy engines

I don't see that block c/n, but there are two similar:

14015445: 1975-'90; 454; car and truck
14015543: 1987-'90; 454; 4-bolt; Gen-5

The heads are rectangle port w/325 cc intake port volume, decent heads when matched up to the rest of the engine. They were a replacement/crate engine head.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #12 (permalink)  
Old 01-07-2013, 03:15 AM
Cars, Trucks, Boats
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, N.W.Ohio, USA
Posts: 779
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 65 Times in 63 Posts
.. I think there is a company that sells crate engines with stock truck peanut port heads, bumped up compression ratio pistons and cam, and rated a surprising 400 HP... I think even peanut ports are big compared to SBC ports...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #13 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 03:19 PM
Cars, Trucks, Boats
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, N.W.Ohio, USA
Posts: 779
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 65 Times in 63 Posts
.. Here's the article on Demon 400HP peanut oval port heads 454" engines:

Cheap Big-Block Chevy Engine Build - Car Craft Magazine
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #14 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 03:27 PM
techinspector1's Avatar
Senior Curmudgeon
 
Last wiki edit: DynoSim combinations Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hemet, California, USA
Age: 72
Posts: 12,552
Wiki Edits: 326

Thanks: 691
Thanked 877 Times in 745 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by BuzzLOL View Post
.. Here's the article on Demon 400HP peanut oval port heads 454" engines:

Cheap Big-Block Chevy Engine Build - Car Craft Magazine
Forget horsepower, look at that torque curve!!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #15 (permalink)  
Old 01-08-2013, 04:06 PM
Cars, Trucks, Boats
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Toledo, N.W.Ohio, USA
Posts: 779
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 65 Times in 63 Posts
.. LOL! Makes 1990 Chevy SS454 pickup's "255HP" look pathetic, doesn't it...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Hotrodding Basics posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
rectangle port intake with oval port head brendawhit Engine 2 05-06-2009 11:26 AM
What rpm is a stock Gen V 454 bottom end good for Hacksaw Engine 1 04-20-2009 12:31 PM
454 BBC pushing 900+ hp Chevy2311 Engine 15 04-15-2009 11:51 PM
400 Hp Stock Engines-im Pissed! bullheimer General Rodding Tech 22 07-17-2003 03:09 PM
Stock eliminator 78 monte Engine 5 01-02-2003 05:10 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:29 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.