Idea - what do you guys think of this... - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > General Discussion> Hotrodders' Lounge
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 12:41 PM
ckucia's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cleveland
Age: 47
Posts: 555
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Idea - what do you guys think of this...

Been reading today about GM's woes.

Got me thinking about the way cars are made.

I'm in the computer industry. One thing that differentiates the two is a high degree of standardization in the computer industry.

For example, I can buy a PC from Dell, or whoever, and I can either have them customize it, or I can later replace or add components from Dell, or other manufacturers to make the computer fit my needs. Within reason, most components are backwards-compatible too, so I don't necessarily have to upgrade everything, and I can invest in some components that are "more than I need" right now, knowing I'll be able to use them with the next system.


What if we were to do the same thing with cars and take it a step further by using the same techniques used to build Linux - mass collaboration?


I'm thinking we could put together a design standard, I named it X-car just to call it something. It would lay out enough of a design to define the basic structure of the chassis, based on a predetermined drivetrain, but would leave everything else up to the builder(s).

Lets say to pick a sedan, just because that's what most people drive, and say it would be RWD. Pick a track and wheelbase - probably something common, I suspect that the roofline would have to be built into the design from the bottom of the windows up. That would pretty much lock in the glass, which is one of those things that's hard to fabricate anyhow - so they could be made in volume. Everything else though, would be structural, with specific mount points defined.

Any person/company could then build a chassis to these specifications, and out of whatever materials (aluminum, steel, carbon fiber, some mix of all of the above). Interior companies could build interiors around the specifications of the inside. If all the body surfaces were decorative (and it seems like most new vehicles are already there), then any company could make body parts out of plastic, aluminum, fiberglass, steel, whateiver, that would bolt up to the standard.

Any engine/transmission could potentially be adapted to the mount points. Ditto with the suspension.

People who buy cars like they buy applicances could buy a pre-built and assembled x-car just like they do today's vehicles.

People who like to customize their factory car could get just a chassis and body, then pick their drivetrain, interior, sound system, etc. and assemble it (or have it assembled) as they wished.

Rodders could build whatever parts they wanted from scratch, or could pick and choose pre-built or homebuilt based on their skills and $$. Any company anywhere in the world could produce any components to the standard, from mild to wild, cheap to expensive.

There could be bare-bones inexpensive transportation boxes with no options and boring bodies, or high-performance versions, or full-luxury versions or any mix in between.

If the standard stayed stable enough for long enough, then a whole used-part market could open up, with everything interchangeable.


I'm thinking this could be done pretty easily right now. There are plenty of existing vehicles out there that are already pretty much the same. They all have suspension components, electrical components, engines, etc. predesigned and with vendors supplying them, either OEM or aftermarket.


Its along the same lines as putting an S-10 chassis under various vehicles, or the several S-10 rebodies out there, but taking it another step further.

Heck, a light truck might be a better place to start since most are frame-based and the market is hot right now - then you could pick from a variety of cabs and beds to fit your needs, or build something like an Avalanche, or whatever.

The biggest challenge I see is getting it licensed/titled and passing all the government regulations. However, you could probably get some buy-in by those agencies - less cars would end up in the boneyard if you could easily swap in a newer powertrain to an otherwise decent chassis, or upgrade as more fuel-efficient and environmentally-friendly stuff came out. New safety features could probably be retrofitted.

Seems like most people get rid of cars because the drivetrain is worn out, or the interior has become ratted, or the body is rusting. However, in a lot of cases, only one of those is the problem, and the rest of the vehicle isn't bad. Cars could last many years longer, and you could alter them relatively easily to fit changing tastes, styles and needs.


Just talking off the top of my head here, but what do you guys think of the concept?

    Advertisement
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
Sponsored Links
Advertisement
 
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 01:43 PM
Member
 

Last journal entry: Free tires
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: South Carolina
Age: 54
Posts: 250
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Most of the mfg are experimenting with platforms that can be re-bodied. Even to the point of sports cars and sedans using the same platform.

I don't remember which one but one of them did have a concept of a complete drive by wire drivetrain that could be re-bodied to reflect changing styles and or replace the drivetrain and keep your body. It was unplug, unbolt, reattach and plug in.

It's possibly coming, but it reminded me of a Jetsons episode for some reason though.

Maybe drive your sedan to work all week, then put the roadster body on for the weekend.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 01:51 PM
ckucia's Avatar
Member
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: cleveland
Age: 47
Posts: 555
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 428ho
I don't remember which one but one of them did have a concept of a complete drive by wire drivetrain that could be re-bodied to reflect changing styles and or replace the drivetrain and keep your body. It was unplug, unbolt, reattach and plug in.
I think that was GMs hydrogen fuel cell chassis - it was sort of a flat bed with wheels, and you could pop any body onto it. I think it was called the Autonomy.

Haven't seen that in awhile, so my memory might not be accurate.

Here's a pic of it...

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 02:48 PM
creativeinteriors's Avatar
Stitching or grease I love it
 

Last journal entry: Wings and Wheels fly in
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Michigan
Posts: 187
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
We are working on that standardization exercise right now. we are looking at what is being called Corporate systems. Like a seat that provides for use in many different platforms. At the moment and historically there is a standard between certain cars like Grand Prix=Impala=Monte Carlo. but not these cars verse a Envoy. GM has been looking to improve that for a few years now but the push has gone up ten fold over the last 18 months.

The only thing that I can say is that it is more like trying to make Desktop and laptops use the same monitor. There are certain areas that FMVSS and consumers wants are conflicting.

But it is clear to the OEM that standarization is the key to the future. Plants are being considered for closure in part on the basis of their ability to flex into the assembly of many different products in part by standarizing assembly lines and methods.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 05:03 PM
bigolblackie's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Toronto Ontario Canada
Posts: 93
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I think its gonna happen,ALL! new cars will look like a honda,or a toyota,and all the motors will be interchangable. They will all look the same,and have the same performance. Thats when the goverment will mandate all hotrods and such are now ilegal. Im afraid,Im very afraid.
__________________
If I had the money,Id do that!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 05:15 PM
Member
 
Last wiki edit: Suspension: designs, shapes, sizes Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Yorkton
Posts: 154
Wiki Edits: 51

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Here is something to work on standardizing..... BOLTS and ELECTRICAL CONNECTORS

Imagine 1/4 inch 1/2 inch 3/4 and in rare cases 1 inche bolts are all that there would be (4 sockets to do every job) Besides bolts are FRIGGEN EXPENSIVE! I would like to see if someone counted up all the bolts and screws in a car and checked out the cost of them all..... my guess is it would be double the value of the car.

Or you know if electrical connectors were standardized. Ever try to find one of the "special" plugs
__________________
BiG WHiskey
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 07:28 PM
killerformula's Avatar
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 
Last wiki edit: Carburetor
Last journal entry: Clean up
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Northeast
Age: 34
Posts: 3,485
Wiki Edits: 3

Thanks: 13
Thanked 27 Times in 18 Posts
SOme manufacturers are even starting to build engine plants together. I forget who's doing it but there are a couple three manufacturers building a plant to use a motor in a few different makes of vehicle.

K
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 03-31-2006, 08:55 PM
Rob Keller's Avatar
AKA:"SLOWRIDE66"take it easy!
 
Last wiki edit: How to post pictures on a forum
Last journal entry: 85 Suburban
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Central Florida U.S.A.
Age: 48
Posts: 4,297
Wiki Edits: 38

Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
I've seen a episode on the history channel about this such thing as a prototype.
Basically the way you describe it but its a flat rolling chassis electric Hydrogen powered with left, middle or right hand steering & interchangeable bodies ,so that when the kids grow up, pop off the mini bus body & put in a chip & a sports car body on it. And Badda big Badda boom new /old car.

I think I taped it on the VCR probably A Modern Marvels episode.I want to say :future car tech"

But if you stifle the creativity process ,you step down the flow of new Ideas & Stem Creativity ,Innovations ,Technology {if everyone is basically driving the same thing with the same parts }

But I always say that is good for the masses leave my gas guzzling beast alone!

Have some respect for your elders!

Now get that suppository on wheels out of my way !

Yeee Hawww!

R



R
__________________
"SlowRide66"

"Illegitimis non carborundum"
Don't let the bastards grind you down!

Crankshaft Coalition Master List of Hotrodding Forums
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 04-01-2006, 12:17 AM
bentwings's Avatar
bentwings
 
Last photo:
Join Date: May 2002
Location: St.Paul, Minn
Age: 72
Posts: 1,796
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 15 Posts
This one's been around for a while but if cars ran like windows:???
taken from context off Google:

If Cars Ran Like Software
I don't know if this is true or not, but it makes for a funny story...

At a recent computer expo (COMDEX), Bill Gates reportedly compared the computer industry with the auto industry and stated, "If GM had kept up with technology like the computer industry has, we would all be driving $25 cars that got 1,000 miles to the gallon."

In response to Bill's comments, General Motors issued a press release stating: If GM had developed technology like Microsoft, we would all be driving cars with the following characteristics:

1. For no reason whatsoever, your car would crash twice a day.

2. Every time they repainted the lines in the road, you would have to buy a new car.

3. Occasionally, your car would die on the freeway for no reason. You would have to pull over to the side of the road, close all of the windows, shut off the car, restart it, and reopen the windows before you could continue. For some reason you would simply accept this.

4. Occasionally, executing a maneuver such as a left turn would cause your car to shut down and refuse to restart, in which case you would have to reinstall the engine.


5. Macintosh would make a car that was powered by the sun, was reliable, five times as fast and twice as easy to drive - but would run on only five percent of the roads.

6. The oil, water temperature, and alternator warning lights would all be replaced by a single "This Car Has Performed An Illegal Operation" warning light.

7. The airbag system would ask, "Are you sure?" before deploying.

8. Occasionally, for no reason whatsoever, your car would lock you out and refuse to let you in until you simultaneously lifted the door handle, turned the key and grabbed hold of the radio antenna.

9. Every time a new car was introduced, car buyers would have to learn how to drive all over again because none of the controls would operate in the same manner as the old car.

10. You'd have to press the "Start" button to turn the engine off.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message

Recent Hotrodders' Lounge posts with photos

Quick Reply
Message:
Options

Register Now

In order to be able to post messages on the Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board forums, you must first register.
Please enter your desired user name (usually not your first and last name), your email address and other required details in the form below.
User Name:
If you do not want to register, fill this field only and the name will be used as user name for your post.
Password
Please enter a password for your user account. Note that passwords are case-sensitive.
Password:
Confirm Password:
Email Address
Please enter a valid email address for yourself.
Email Address:

Log-in

Human Verification

In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.




Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may post new threads
You may post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A question for the older guys here... FrankR Hotrodders' Lounge 18 12-29-2005 09:05 AM
hey guys new member 37ford4dr Introduce Yourself 3 11-11-2005 01:50 PM
I dropped this course, it was REAL GAY (pun intended) Ghetto Jet Hotrodders' Lounge 40 09-10-2005 04:16 PM
1988 chevy s-10 blazer, and i want to put a 327 in it. comments, good idea bad idea. 1969css Introduce Yourself 1 12-22-2004 05:18 AM
Trunk idea Wmarden Interior 13 11-07-2002 11:11 AM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:55 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.