Intake question....Vic JR or Air Gap RPM - Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board
Hotrodders.com -- Hot Rod Forum



Register FAQ Search Today's Posts Unanswered Posts Auto Escrow Insurance Auto Loans
Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board > Tech Help> Engine
User Name
Password
lost password?   |   register now

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2013, 06:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 12
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Intake question....Vic JR or Air Gap RPM

I am upgrading my 383 sbc and unsure of which intake I should use. It is 10-1 comp with edelbrock e210 heads and a comp roller cam 235@.050 and 565 lift. I have both intakes and plan to sell one. This is a street strip car that is for fun only. I would try both but this is in a 98 Camaro and to change the intake involves dropping the motor out of the bottom of the car. I am leaning towards the air gap cause I do not want to loose my low end torque. For the record, I have a 3000 stall and 3.73 gears.
Reply With Quote
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 01-20-2013, 09:27 PM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 55
Posts: 3,527
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 100
Thanked 247 Times in 242 Posts
I use a jr on my car.if you make power and want more the answer is clear.I have no issues with torque
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 06:45 AM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,163
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 175 Times in 173 Posts
On your engine the power difference is very very small. Less than 10hp at peak.
But the difference in torque is quite a lot.

You do not have enough "motor" or rpm to take advantage of a Vic JR.
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 07:31 AM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 55
Posts: 3,527
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 100
Thanked 247 Times in 242 Posts
there is a possibility that fb88 is correct this time?

On my Camaro I took of a performer and installed a vic junior and picked up 4/10s.
I was using a solid cam and 830 holley,stockish cast iron heads
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 07:58 AM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,163
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 175 Times in 173 Posts
This what it looks like when you build for torque and
make use of it.
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 08:17 AM
vinniekq2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: BC,Canada
Age: 55
Posts: 3,527
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 100
Thanked 247 Times in 242 Posts
Reply With Quote
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 08:46 AM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,163
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 175 Times in 173 Posts
This was not the best one of the day. Just the one that got captured on video.
On the best passes, my friend said it clearly yanked both front wheels a good 3-4 inches.
Unfortunately he was watching . not filming.

Still need to test and tune using header collector extensions. Makes a big difference on a car like this.

The bite there is pretty good.

Have not even tried the nitrous on this car yet. Needs frame connectors first.
A work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 10:01 AM
malc's Avatar
Born To Be Mild
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Espaņa Right Coast
Age: 62
Posts: 3,023
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 33
Thanked 28 Times in 28 Posts
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 05:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 12
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I was thinking the rpm airgap was the way to go myself.

Hey Fbird, what kinda 60' time are you cutting to pull the tires off the ground? just wondering about how much I need to do the same.
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 01-21-2013, 07:38 PM
Old & Furious
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: MD
Age: 40
Posts: 1,073
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 6
Thanked 86 Times in 83 Posts
I think the cam is a littlw small for the jr maybe just border line. But makes the air gap a good choice. They are not perfect many say its very close the the jr either way. Might loose tq and hp either way performer rpm is a good manifold i would not be suprised to see the regular rpm hit the mark better than the air gap.
Reply With Quote
  #11 (permalink)  
Old 01-22-2013, 01:25 AM
F-BIRD'88's Avatar
Yada Yada Yada
 
Last photo:
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 8,163
Wiki Edits: 0

Thanks: 0
Thanked 175 Times in 173 Posts
1.60sec so far
Reply With Quote

Recent Engine posts with photos


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
edelbrock air gap rpm intake problem marioflores Engine 10 01-03-2011 02:11 PM
Rpm Air Gap Intake Onto A Stock 400sbc jarhead_615 Engine 2 04-20-2010 06:27 AM
RPM Air Gap Intake mlmcmahan42 Engine 8 12-16-2009 09:48 AM
New RPM Dual Quad Air-Gap Intake bccsrc Engine 7 01-31-2006 04:29 PM
Edelbrock RPM intake or RPM Air Gap? KeithB123 Engine 1 02-18-2004 08:08 PM


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Copyright Hotrodders.com 1999 - 2012. All Rights Reserved.