Hot Rod Forum : Hotrodders Bulletin Board - View Single Post - Intake runners and superchargers?
View Single Post
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 01-13-2012, 08:35 AM
68NovaSS's Avatar
68NovaSS 68NovaSS is offline
Hotrodders.com Moderator
 
Last wiki edit: Working with chromed bolts
Last journal entry: New to me T-Bucket
Last photo:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Nine Mile Falls/Suncrest, WA
Posts: 5,250
Wiki Edits: 9

Thanks: 105
Thanked 133 Times in 124 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hotrodrobert
Most blower manifolds look like that on the inside. Length is not very important just no restriction to flow into the head.
Whipple is the best you can get for a positive displacement blower right now.
If you try to tune the length of the runner for a given RPM range, it would take a very long runner to help on a forced induction intake. The speed of sound is the deal, the pressure waves travel in the air at a certain speed and as pressure changes, so does the speed of the wave. A wave in the compressed air woucl require a runner that was very very long to work.
Everybody has a right to their opinion, but to arbitrarily state one product or system is better than another, it needs to go a step further, posting some reliable data might help support your theory. IMO, your thoughts regarding runner length and velocity at "the speed of sound" and the wave thing aren't realistic or relevant for forced induction. I will agree, for NA motors, velocity is key; wave pulses? Maybe from rotor pulse or "push", certainly not something we count on for building power with forced induction.
__________________
Boost adds dignity to what would otherwise be a vulgar brawl...

Midnight Sun Street Rod Association
Reply With Quote