![]() |
|
|
|
||||||
|
Should I step up to 1/2" feed and 3/8" return or a 3/8" feed and 3/8" return?
|
|
||||||
|
Also right now I have one of those $20 holley regulators. Should I step up to something like this. Then I could run 3/8" feed and return and also have the possibility of swapping to efi down the road which is in the predreaming/planning stages.
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
FWIW you can convert to TBI for less than the cost of a new carb. You can also swap in a JY distributor allowing computer controlled timing advance. 400hp will be maxxing out stock BBC TBI injectors though, the BBC throttle body itself will flow more than enough air with a little finessing. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
I have thrown that idea around before with just using an MS1 or MS2 to run it. I mean I already have the carb and everything so no immediate need to swap right now. As long as the fuel system is there to support fuel injection I can easily just go over to the regulator and turn up the pressure and bolt on the TB and do my tuning from there. Might be something Ill consider down the road but right now I already have a hand full of things I want to get done to the car over winter and I don't really want to add another to it but I will definitely keep that thought in the back of my head though. Im definitely leaning towards an EFI capable fuel system though and probably 3/8" feed and return. I believe I have heard before that 3/8" is good for about 450hp? |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
Depending on the carb you're running you may not see much power gain at peak- if any at all- compared to a TBI unit. The real advantage comes in at part throttle in terms of mileage, super smooth acceleration with no bogging, and greatly increased durability of your engine. You may want to run MS2, but I can't really find any reason for myself to switch from MS1 to MS2. It has a hair more refinement but the difference is so small you'd likely never notice it. With MSnS on a MS1 system and switching fuel tables you essentially have 2 12X12 fuel tables that work in conjunction. MS2 has an even bigger table (God only knows why you'd need it, maybe for an engine that sees 10,000rpm, 35psi, and is street driven), slightly better acceleration enrichment (again not enough to ever notice IMO) and faster response with a wideband oxygen sensor (again nothing that I could ever see needing if you have your system tuned properly). I got my MS1 used for $100 shipped and bought all the sensors but the oxygen sensor from a junkyard (with pigtail connectors) for $5. I bought a new oxygen sensor for $7. The harness can be bought for like $75 or made with parts for about $20- my first harness was included with my first MS system, I'm making the harness for the second installation. |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
|
|
|||||
|
Quote:
fuel milage will be no better than a q-jet.. and the bbc tbi (iirc) is a 550-600 cfm unit... that will not bolt to a q jet intake.. if like you said in the thread about carb a 350 NEEDING a 750 carb.. then a 550 cfm tbi is a bottle neck .. RIGHT.. if and when I change to efi on my monty SS (same car as his, both g body's) I'd go with a g/n tank set up as the set up from that v6 monty will not work with any multiport efi.. and other than cold start emissions, he gains zero.. other than a lighter wallet If , I was him. I'd search to see if all the g body tanks accept the g/n sender/pump set up.. if I had the link from the turbo buick board I'l post it here.. lost that when computer died.. but I think the g/n t-type tank is a different animal and it and sender have it's own part #.. he can spend the money ONCE.. or spend it TWICE... his choice.. but .. carry on.. Last edited by E.Furgal; 10-24-2012 at 02:34 PM. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
To be honest I don't even know why I bother, obviously zildjian understands the clear advantages and after seeing all your other posts I'm not too sure you can tell your *** from a hole in the ground. |
|
|||||
|
Quote:
if the o/p wants to believe you thats fine.. g.m.'s own cars that both with same gears/ same weight.. and same 305 engine.. one with a q-jet and one tbi.. one with better aero.. both passed the same emmission test and both within 1 mpg of each other.. and that would be the very low aero on one and a brick aero of the other.. but he can believe you if he chooses.. the facts are right there as g.m. had both in cars at the same time... oops |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
Also what do you think will be easier and more cost effective. Trying to track down a GN fuel tank/pickup/pump setup and paying for it or just taking the setup I have now out of the monte carlo and swapping out the factory v6 fuel pump? and maybe having some AN fittings welded onto the top of the pickup? |
|
||||||
|
Quote:
|
|
||||||
|
Installing Electric Fuel Pickup Hanger Unit - MonteCarloSS.com Message Board
Seems like the 4.3 pickup is the way to go.... |
|
|
| Recent Hotrodding Basics posts with photos |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Ford inline six to 2300 inline 4 swap. | 74chevyflat | Engine | 3 | 05-20-2010 10:12 PM |
| get-inline | get-inline | Introduce Yourself | 1 | 11-05-2007 05:38 AM |
| dual inline 6's inline 12! | 87442lover | Hotrodders' Lounge | 6 | 06-17-2004 06:25 PM |
| '89 Inline 6 | Cruiseomatic | Engine | 12 | 07-26-2003 01:57 PM |
| inline six | Gr8 '48 bow tie | Hotrodders' Lounge | 10 | 01-29-2003 03:25 PM |